bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Battaglini, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Battaglini, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Visual speech supports phonetic attunement in the absence of early auditory input

The first year of life is considered a sensitive period for the acquisition of phonetic categories, a hallmark of successful native language specialization. The extent to which this process depends on early auditory experience and intrinsic biological constraints remains unresolved. We measured neural encoding of continuous natural speech in hearing children (HC) and cochlear implant (CI) users with congenital or acquired deafness, contrasting children with and without access to auditory input in the first year of life. Speech encoding was present across all groups, but its specificity depended on early input: auditory phonetic features were encoded only in children exposed to speech within the first year, whereas visually discriminable phonetic features were encoded regardless of auditory deprivation. These findings show that early sensory input gates phonetic attunement; this constraint is not limited to or grounded in audition but instead reveals a sensitive period that is modality-flexible in mechanism and experience-dependent in expression.

neuroscience↗

Brain and grammar: revealing electrophysiological basic structures with competing statistical models

Acoustic, lexical and syntactic information is simultaneously processed in the brain. Therefore, distinguishing the electrophysiological activity pertaining to these components requires complex and indirect strategies. Capitalizing on previous works which factor out acoustic information, we could concentrate on the lexical and syntactic contribution to language processing by testing competing statistical models. We exploited EEG recordings and compared different surprisal models selectively involving lexical information, part of speech or syntactic structures in various combinations. EEG responses were recorded in 32 participants during listening to affirmative active declarative sentences and compared the activation corresponding to basic syntactic structures, such as noun phrases vs verb phrases. Lexical and syntactic processing activates different frequency bands, different time windows and different networks. Moreover, surprisal models based on part of speech inventory only do not explain well the electrophysiological data, while those including syntactic information do. Finally, we confirm previous measures obtained with intracortical recordings independently supporting the original hypothesis addressed here in a robust way.

neuroscience↗