Biology subjects

Bateman, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Bateman, R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Biomarker Variability Limits Individualized Amyloid Time Estimation in Alzheimer Disease

ObjectiveDisease progression modeling (DPM) or "amyloid time" is increasingly used to stage Alzheimer disease (AD). DPM performance depends on within-individual heterogeneity in rates of pathological accumulation as well as test-retest reliability of the biomarker. The relative contributions of these variabilities have not been systematically assessed. This would be particularly relevant if extrapolations from DPM were to be used to make individual-level predictions for research, clinical trials, or potentially future clinical practice. MethodsWe conducted simulation studies incorporating empirically-derived noise properties from amyloid biomarkers to assess the contributions of inter- and intra-individual variability. Findings generalized in an autosomal dominant AD cohort with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma biomarkers and in a sporadic AD cohort with both amyloid PET and plasma biomarkers. We assessed group level DPM performance via mean average error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). At the individual level, we evaluated distinctness of distributions of biomarker levels associated with specific disease timings. ResultsInter-individual variability was the dominant source of error in temporal estimates. Intra-individual variability reduced estimate stability. Optimal performance occurred in biomarkers with positive average accumulation rates where a subset of individuals had exceptionally high levels of accumulation. In research study data, amyloid PET outperformed CSF and plasma biomarkers. InterpretationDPM is fundamentally constrained by dynamic range, variability, and test-retest reliability of the biomarker of interest. Current DPM approaches are more robust at the group level, particularly when applied to biomarkers with more than 10-15% variability like fluid biomarkers. FundingNational Institute on Aging, Alzheimers Association, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Korean Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Spanish Institute of Health.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Functional variations in gamma-secretase activity are critical determinants of the clinical, biomarker, and cognitive progression of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease

BackgroundThe balance between production, clearance, and toxicity of A{beta} peptides is central to Alzheimers disease (AD) pathobiology. Though highly variable in terms of age at symptom onset (AAO), hundreds of variants in PSEN1 cause autosomal dominant forms of AD (ADAD) with nearly complete penetrance. PSEN1 forms the catalytic core of the {gamma}-secretase complex and thereby directly mediates the production of longer, aggregation-prone A{beta} peptides relative to shorter, non-aggregating peptides. We hypothesized that the broad AAO and biomarker heterogeneity seen across ADAD would be predictable based on mutation-specific differences in the production of A{beta} species. MethodsA{beta}-37, 38, 40, 42, and 43 production was quantified from 161 unique PSEN1 variants expressed in HEK293 cells. Prediction of AAO was carried out in 106 variants with available AAO and then replicated in 55 variants represented across 190 PSEN1 mutation carriers who have detailed cognitive and biomarker data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimers Network (DIAN). ResultsVariations in A{beta} production across the 161 mutations examined in cell-based models were highly predictive of AAO. In those with corresponding in vivo data from the DIAN study, our cell-based {gamma}-secretase composite was strongly associated with biomarker and cognitive trajectories. ConclusionsThese findings elucidate the critical link between {gamma}-secretase function, A{beta} production, and AD progression and offer mechanistic support for the amyloid hypothesis. The approach used here represents a powerful tool to account for heterogeneity in disease progression in ADAD clinical trials and to assess the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance or with limited family history.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

A Peptide-Centric Quantitative Proteomics Dataset for the Phenotypic Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimers disease (AD) is a looming public health disaster with limited interventions. Alzheimers is a complex disease that can present with or without causative mutations and can be accompanied by a range of age-related comorbidities. This diverse presentation makes it difficult to study molecular changes specific to AD. To better understand the molecular signatures of disease we constructed a unique human brain sample cohort inclusive of autosomal dominant AD dementia (ADD), sporadic ADD, and those without dementia but with high AD histopathologic burden, and cognitively normal individuals with no/minimal AD histopathologic burden. All samples are clinically well characterized, and brain tissue was preserved postmortem by rapid autopsy. Samples from four brain regions were processed and analyzed by data-independent acquisition LC-MS/MS. Here we present a high-quality quantitative dataset at the peptide and protein level for each brain region. Multiple internal and external control strategies were included in this experiment to ensure data quality. All data are deposited in the ProteomeXchange repositories and available from each step of our processing.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Multimodal brain age estimates relate to Alzheimer disease biomarkers and cognition in early stages: a cross-sectional observational study

BackgroundEstimates of "brain-predicted age" quantify apparent brain age compared to normative trajectories of neuroimaging features. The brain age gap (BAG) between predicted and chronological age is elevated in symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD), but has not been well explored in preclinical AD. Prior studies have typically modeled BAG with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but more recently other modalities, including functional connectivity (FC) and multimodal MRI, have been explored. MethodsWe trained three models to predict age from FC, volumetric (Vol), or multimodal MRI (Vol+FC) in 390 control participants (18-89 years old). In independent samples of 144 older adult controls, 154 preclinical AD participants, and 154 cognitively impaired (CI; CDR > 0) participants, we tested relationships between BAG and AD biomarkers of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration, as well as a global cognitive composite. ResultsAll models predicted age in the control training set, with the multimodal model outperforming the unimodal models. All three BAG estimates were significantly elevated in CI compared to controls. FC-BAG and Vol+FC-BAG were marginally reduced in preclinical AD participants compared to controls. In CI participants only, elevated Vol-BAG and Vol+FC-BAG were associated with more advanced AD pathology and lower cognitive performance. ConclusionsBoth FC-BAG and Vol-BAG are elevated in CI participants. However, FC and volumetric MRI also capture complementary signals. Specifically, FC-BAG may capture a unique biphasic response to preclinical AD pathology, while Vol-BAG may capture pathological progression and cognitive decline in the symptomatic stage. A multimodal age-prediction model captures these modality-specific patterns, and further, improves sensitivity to healthy age differences. FundingThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01-AG026276, P01-AG03991, P30-AG066444, 5-R01-AG052550, 5-R01-AG057680, 1-R01-AG067505, 1S10RR022984-01A1, U19-AG032438), the BrightFocus Foundation (A2022014F), and the Alzheimers Association (SG-20-690363-DIAN).

neuroscience↗