Biology subjects

Barman, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Barman, K..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Mass spectrometric analysis and biostimulatory effects of boar seminal gel, saliva and semen in pigs

The present study aimed to identify novel biostimulatory compounds in boar seminal gel (SG), saliva and semen using Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). SG alone and its combined application with saliva (SG+saliva) and semen (SG+semen) also studied to train young boars. SG alone and SG+Saliva investigated for estrus induction in gilts and sows. Distilled water (DW) exposure was kept as control. SG, saliva and semen screened for total 105, 96 and 89 compounds. The highest concentration was of alkanes followed by sugar alcohols, then hydrocarbons, amino acids and fatty acids. Elaidic acid is the novel compound identified in pigs. Other compounds were tridecenol, undecane, hexadecone, eicosane, tetracosane etc. Further, young males (64.86%) were able to get trained. Significant higher (p<0.05) number of males got trained in exposure to SG (80%), SG+saliva (75%) and SG+semen (75%) than control. The time (hrs) taken by young boars to get trained on exposure to combination of SG+saliva (244{+/-}22.19) and SG+semen (216{+/-}13.14) was lesser (p<0.05) than SG (356{+/-}61.85) alone. Interval (hrs) for exhibition of different sexual behaviour by males on exposure to SG, saliva and semen was lesser (p<0.05) than control. Estrus was induced in 61.25% of females. Significant (p<0.05) higher number of females showed estrus response to exposure of SG (72.72%) and SG+saliva (69.23%) than control. Interval taken to exhibit estrus was lesser (p<0.05) in females exposed to SG+saliva (201.88{+/-}12.66) than SG (262.14{+/-}20.06) alone. Interval (hrs) for exhibition of different sexual behaviour by females on exposure to SG+saliva was lesser (p<0.05) than control. In conclusion, novel compounds with biostimulatory properties have been identified in boar SG, saliva and semen. The combined exposure of SG with saliva and semen have more intense biostimulation effect than SG alone. Such compounds and biostimulatory effects can be exploited for augmenting reproductive efficiency in pigs.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2023

Hormonal Interventions for optimizing reproductive efficiency in pigs at Farmers field

ObjectiveOptimizing reproductive efficiency in terms of estrus induction and production performance using simplified hormonal intervention using GnRH, gonadotropins and progesterone at farmers field conditions to bred animals with superior quality semen and also to reduce the maintenance cost. MethodThe present study was planned for optimizing reproductive efficiency using four different easily available hormonal agents with simplified protocols at farmers field. A total of 126 females were used in the study. Hormonal protocols I, II, III and IV using GnRH + (PMSG+ hCG), (PMSG+ hCG), PMSG alone and prepared progesterone gel respectively were used for estrus induction in gilts and sows. ResultsThe estrus induction/rate was (77.77%, 81.36%, 78.57% and 50% respectively. The corresponding figures for interval (hrs) of heat exhibition from hormonal administration (121.33{+/-}4.93, 121.54{+/-}3.60, 78.52{+/-}4.52 and 192{+/-}24), conception rate (%) (72.22%, 81.25%, 68.18% and 33.33%) farrowing rate (55.55%, 68.29%, 68.18% and 33.33 %), total litter size at birth (7.2{+/-}0.64, 7.90{+/-}0.47, 8.90{+/-}0.47 and 7.00{+/-}0) and hormonal cost (Rs.) per animal (570, 335, 280 and 250 Rs.) were respectively. The easier to use protocol was III followed by II, I and IV. ConclusionIt was found that protocol II and III are effective and easier so can be used for optimizing reproductive efficiency in pigs at farmers field.

physiology↗

bioRxiv2023

Metagenomic analysis of Pigs' faecal microbiome and its functional response associated with dietary fibre

Pig husbandry is the most valued and economically sustainable husbandry in the livestock farming system. The performance and productivity of the pig are chiefly dependent on the nutritional factor steered by gut beneficial bacteria. The swine gut microbiome has a direct relationship with feed efficiency. As a consequence, identifying microbial taxonomy and functional capacity is critical for proper nutrient digestion. In the present investigation, eighteen grower pigs aged 3 months and weighing 30{+/-}0.55 kg were allocated into three different groups using a randomized block layout and supplemented with QPM maize fodder of 0, 5, and 10% to the basal diet by substituting (wt/wt on DM) the maize grains, and named as T0, T1, and T2 to probe the increase in gut beneficial bacteria found in the faecal contents. For comparison with T0, T1, and T2, a random faecal sample designated R was collected from six grower pigs of the same age group and bodyweight fed a maize-soya bean-based diet. The experiment is being carried out to investigate the effect of various maize fodder levels on the metagenomic profiles of pig gut microbiota using the 16S rRNA gene. All of the experimental diets were iso-nitrogenous, with protein content ranging from 18.37 to 18.63 per cent. The data generated by 16S rRNA amplicon analysis was 68, 56, 61, and 39 Mb in R, T0, T1, and T2 samples, respectively. From taxonomic distribution, bacterial phyla namely Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Spirochetes are found in descending order of relative abundance in the R, T0, and T1 groups, respectively, while Spirochaetes, Proteobacteria, Fibrobacteres, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutesare found in descending order of relative abundance in the T2 group. The relative profusion of Fibrobacter succinogenes is 0.89% and 16.84% in the T1 and T2 groups. According to the findings, a higher level of maize fodder in the diet of grower pigs promotes the growth of fibre-degrading bacteria in the gut microbiota, particularly Fibrobacter succinogenes. Moreover, feeding green maize has decreased the population of methanobacteria in the gut of pigs, which in turn has limited the production of methane.

genomics↗