bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bamber, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Bamber, J. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Applying integrated population models to guide conservation planning: Western Capercaillie in Scotland

O_LIMany conservation interventions prove ineffective because they lack a rigorous evidence-base. Multifactorial drivers and data limitations often hinder anticipatory planning and are difficult to tackle with standard methods. Predictive modelling approaches that integrate diverse data sources with biological hypotheses can bridge this gap by clarifying the drivers of decline and evaluating management options under uncertainty. C_LIO_LI We developed a Bayesian integrated population model (IPM) applicable to lekking species, combining incomplete data from different life stages and seasons while accounting for observation error. IPMs are widely recognised for reducing bias relative to single-data-stream analyses, yet their application in conservation planning remains limited. C_LIO_LIWe applied the model to the threatened Western Capercaillie population in Scotland, which has been declining since at least the 1980s despite decades of conservation efforts, a typical case requiring urgent, evidence-based management. By fitting the model to 30 years of biased and incomplete monitoring data, we investigated associations between demographic processes and their potential drivers, including weather variables, fence collision mortality and a proxy of predation pressure. We used model predictions to evaluate the joint effectiveness of proposed management actions aimed at improving vital rates, including fence management and diversionary feeding. C_LIO_LIData integration improved population estimate precision by 17-49% relative to standalone national survey estimates, confirming that the decline continued from 1990-2023. Reproductive rate was related to the pattern of April warming, negatively affected by pre-breeding precipitation and positively by vole abundance, the latter consistent with the alternative prey hypothesis. Model predictions indicated that combining diversionary feeding with fence removal produced the most favourable conservation outcomes, but growth remained limited and uncertainty included possible continued decline. C_LIO_LI5. This modelling approach forms a key component of Scotlands Capercaillie Emergency Plan 2025-2030, guiding management by assessing population-level responses and predicting conservation intervention outcomes. In future, the model could support formal adaptive management through iterative evaluation of interventions as new data become available. Beyond this case study, our integrated approach offers a transferable framework for managing multifactorial declines in other threatened species under uncertainty. C_LI

ecology↗

Empirical evidence that diversionary feeding increases productivity in ground-nesting birds.

The recovery of predator populations can negatively impact other species of conservation concern, leading to conservation conflicts. Evidence-based solutions are needed to resolve such conflicts without sacrificing hard-won gains for recovering species. Well-designed, large-scale field experiments provide the most rigorous evidence to justify new forms of intervention, but they are notoriously hard to implement. Further, monitoring scarce species without negative impacts is challenging, calling for indirect and non-invasive monitoring methods. Uncertainties remain about whether observational monitoring adequately reflects the true processes of interest. Having conducted a well-designed, large-scale, diversionary feeding field experiment that reduced artificial nest depredation, we evaluated whether this translated to capercaillie productivity in the same area. Using camera traps aimed at dust baths, we non-invasively monitored capercaillie hen productivity over 3 years and in 30 1km2 grid cells under a randomised control (un-fed) and treatment (fed) design. Diversionary feeding significantly increased the probability that a detected hen would have a brood. The impact of diversionary feeding did not change over the brooding season, indicating that hens without a brood had failed due to nest depredation rather than predation of chicks. The probability of detecting a hen with a brood was 0.85 (0.65-0.94) in fed locations, more than double that in unfed locations, which was 0.37 (CI 0.2-0.57). The average brood size was reduced over time, but the change did not differ between fed and unfed sites. This is in line with natural mortality occurring independently of diversionary feeding. Importantly, the increased chance of having a brood in the fed areas and the predicted brood size leads to a substantial increase in overall productivity - the expected number of chicks per hen - at the end of the sampling season. This was just 0.82 (0.35 - 1.29) chicks per hen in the unfed sites and more than double 1.90 (1.24 - 2.55) chicks in fed sites. This study provides compelling empirical evidence that diversionary feeding positively affects productivity, offering an effective non-lethal solution to the increasingly common conservation conflict where both predator and prey are afforded protection.

ecology↗