bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Baldauf, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Baldauf, D..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Distinct resting-state connectomes for face and scene perception predict individual task performance

Face and scene perception rely on distinct neural networks centered on the Fusiform Face Area (FFA) and Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA). However, how these regions interact with broader brain networks remains unclear. Using resting-state fMRI and MEG data, we mapped the spatial and frequency-specific functional connectivity of the FFA and PPA. We found that the FFA showed predominant fMRI connectivity with lateral occipitotemporal, inferior temporal, and temporoparietal regions, while the PPA connected more strongly with ventral medial visual, posterior cingulate, and entorhinal-perirhinal areas. MEG analyses further revealed this network segregation was reflected in beta and gamma bands. Importantly, connectome-based predictive modeling showed that the strength of these intrinsic fMRI connectivity patterns predicted individual reaction times on corresponding face and scene perception tasks. Our findings demonstrate that the FFA and PPA anchor distinct intrinsic networks with unique spatio-temporal profiles that provide a functional architecture supporting their specialized roles in face and scene perception.

neuroscience↗

Surface-based probabilistic tractography uncovers segregated white matter pathways underlying spatial and non-spatial control

The frontal eye field (FEF) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are prefrontal regions that mediate top-down functions, with mounting neuroimaging evidence suggesting that they specialize in controlling spatial versus non-spatial processing, respectively. We hypothesized that their unique patterns of structural connectivity underlie these specialized roles. To accurately infer the localization of FEF and IFJ in standard space, we performed an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of fMRI paradigms that reliably targeted these regions. Using surface-based probabilistic tractography methods at the individual subject level, we tracked streamlines ipsilaterally from the inferred FEF and IFJ activation peaks to the dorsal and ventral visual streams mapped on the native white matter surface parcellated using the multimodal Glasser atlas. By contrasting FEF and IFJ connectivity likelihoods, we found predominant structural connectivity from the FEF to regions of the dorsal visual stream compared to the IFJ (particularly in the left hemisphere), and conversely, predominant structural connectivity from the IFJ to regions of the ventral visual stream compared to the FEF bilaterally. Additionally, we analyzed the cortical terminations of the superior longitudinal fasciculus to the FEF and IFJ, implicating its first and third branches as segregated pathways mediating their communication to the posterior parietal cortex. The structural connectivity fingerprints of the FEF and IFJ support the view that the two visual stream architectures extend to the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex and provide converging anatomical evidence of their specialization in spatial versus non-spatial control.

neuroscience↗

Covariance-based Decoding Reveals Content-specific Feature Integration and Top-down Processing for Imagined Faces versus Places

When we internally generate mental images, we need to combine multiple features into a whole. Direct evidence for such feature integration during visual imagery is still lacking. Moreover, cognitive control mechanisms, including memory and attention, exert top-down influences on the perceptual system during mental images generation. However, it is unclear whether such top-down processing is content-specific or not. Feature integration and top-down processing involve short-range connectivity within visual areas, and long-range connectivity between control and visual areas, respectively. Here, we used a minimally constrained experimental paradigm wherein imagery categories were prompted using visual word cues only, and we decoded face versus place imagery based on their underlying connectivity patterns. Our results show that face and place imagery can be decoded from both short-range and long-range connections. These findings suggest that feature integration does not require an external stimulus but occurs also for purely internally generated images. Furthermore, control and visual areas exchange information specifically tailored to imagery content. TeaserDecoding visual imagery from brain connectivity reveals a content-specific interconnected neural code for internal image generation.

neuroscience↗

Accurate localization and coactivation profiles of the FEF and IFJ: an ALE and MACM fMRI meta-analysis

The frontal eye field (FEF) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are prefrontal structures involved in mediating multiple aspects of goal-driven behavior. Despite being recognized as prominent nodes of the networks underlying spatial attention and oculomotor control, and working memory and cognitive control, respectively, the limited quantitative evidence on their precise localization has considerably impeded the detailed understanding of their structure and connectivity. In this study, we performed an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) fMRI meta-analysis by selecting studies that employed standard paradigms to accurately infer the localization of these regions in stereotaxic space. For the FEF, we found the highest spatial convergence of activations for prosaccades and antisaccades paradigms at the junction of the precentral sulcus and superior frontal sulcus. For the IFJ, we found consistent activations across oddball/attention, working memory, Stroop, and task-switching paradigms at the junction of the inferior precentral sulcus and inferior frontal sulcus. We related these clusters to previous meta-analyses, sulcal/gyral neuroanatomy, and a recent comprehensive brain parcellation, highlighting important differences compared to their results and taxonomy. Finally, we employed the ALE peak coordinates as seeds to perform a meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) analysis, which revealed systematic coactivation patterns spanning the frontal, parietal and temporal cortices. We decoded the behavioral domains associated with these coactivations, suggesting that these may allow FEF and IFJ to support their specialized roles in flexible behavior. Our study provides meta-analytic groundwork for investigating the relationship between functional specialization and connectivity of two crucial control structures of the prefrontal cortex.

neuroscience↗

Functional connectivity fingerprints of the frontal eye fields and inferior frontal junction in the dorsal vs. ventral prefrontal cortex

Neuroimaging evidence suggests that the frontal eye field (FEF) and inferior frontal junction (IFJ) govern the encoding of spatial and non-spatial (such as feature- or object-based) representations, respectively, both during visual attention and working memory tasks. However, it is still unclear whether such contrasting functional segregation is also reflected in their underlying functional connectivity patterns. Here, we hypothesized that FEF has predominant functional coupling with spatiotopically organized regions in the dorsal ( where) visual stream, whereas IFJ has predominant functional connectivity with the ventral ( what) visual stream. We applied seed-based functional connectivity analyses to temporally high-resolving resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. We parcellated the brain according to the multimodal Glasser atlas and tested, for various frequency bands, whether the spontaneous activity of each parcel in the ventral and dorsal visual pathway has predominant functional connectivity with FEF or IFJ. The results show that FEF has a robust power correlation with the dorsal visual pathway in beta and gamma bands. In contrast, anterior IFJ (IFJa) has a strong power coupling with the ventral visual stream in delta, beta, and gamma oscillations. Moreover, while FEF is directly phase-coupled with the superior parietal lobe in the beta band, IFJa is directly phase-coupled with the middle and inferior temporal cortex in delta and gamma oscillations. We argue that these intrinsic connectivity fingerprints are congruent with each brain regions function. Therefore, we conclude that FEF and IFJ have dissociable connectivity patterns that fit their respective functional roles in spatial vs. non-spatial top-down attention and working memory control.

neuroscience↗

Distinct cortical networks subserve spatio-temporal sampling in vision through different oscillatory rhythms

Although visual input arrives continuously, sensory information is segmented into discrete events. Here, the neural correlates of spatiotemporal binding in male/female human subjects were investigated with MEG using two tasks where separate flashes were presented on each trial but were perceived, in a bi-stable way, as either a single, or two separate, events. The first task (two-flash fusion: TFF) involved judging one versus two flashes while in the second task (apparent motion: AM) participants judged coherent motion versus two stationary flashes. Results indicate two different functional networks underlying two unique aspects of visual temporal binding. In the TFF task, involving an integration window of {approx}50 ms, evoked responses differed as a function of perceptual interpretation by {approx}25 ms after stimuli presentation. Multivariate decoding of subjective perception based on prestimulus oscillatory phase was significant for alpha-band activity in the right medial temporal (MT) area, with the strength of pre-stimulus connectivity between early visual areas and MT being predictive of performance. In contrast, the longer integration window ({approx}130 ms) for AM showed evoked field differences only {approx}250 ms after stimuli onset. Phase decoding of the perceptual outcome in the AM task was strongest for theta-band activity, localized to a right intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) source. Pre-stimulus connectivity between MT and IPS seeds in the theta band best predicted perceptual outcome. Overall, these results show a strong relationship between specific spatiotemporal binding windows and specific oscillations, linked to the information flow between different areas of the "where" and "when" visual processing pathways. Significance StatementMultiple neural rhythms seem relevant for sampling visual information across space and time, but the cortical networks underlying these fundamental computational principles of the visual system remain unexplored. We filled this gap by employing source-level multivariate decoding and connectivity analyses of magnetoencephalographic data recorded during an integration/segregation task of temporal and spatio-temporal events. We identified a first and faster network involving early visual areas (V2 to MT/V5) that determines the basic temporal resolution of visual perception at the speed of the alpha rhythm, and a second slower network involving parietal regions (IPS) that had a key role in the integration of more complex spatiotemporal events at a theta speed. These findings elucidate the neural mechanisms that transfer sensory information into temporal sequences.

neuroscience↗

Spatial attention enhances cortical tracking of quasi-rhythmic visual stimuli

Successfully interpreting and navigating our natural visual environment requires us to track its dynamics constantly. Additionally, we focus our attention on behaviorally relevant stimuli to enhance their neural processing. Little is known, however, about how sustained attention affects the ongoing tracking of stimuli with rich natural temporal dynamics. Here, we used MRI-informed source reconstructions of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data to map to what extent various cortical areas track concurrent continuous quasi-rhythmic visual stimulation. Further, we tested how top-down visuo-spatial attention influences this tracking process. Our bilaterally presented quasi-rhythmic stimuli covered a dynamic range of 4 - 20Hz, subdivided into three distinct bands. As an experimental control, we also included strictly rhythmic stimulation (10 vs 12 Hz). Using a spectral measure of brain-stimulus coupling, we were able to track the neural processing of left vs. right stimuli independently, even while fluctuating within the same frequency range. The fidelity of neural tracking depended on the stimulation frequencies, decreasing for higher frequency bands. Both attended and non-attended stimuli were tracked beyond early visual cortices, in ventral and dorsal streams depending on the stimulus frequency. In general, tracking improved with the deployment of visuo-spatial attention to the stimulus location. Our results provide new insights into how human visual cortices process concurrent dynamic stimuli and provide a potential mechanism - namely increasing the temporal precision of tracking - for boosting the neural representation of attended input.

neuroscience↗