bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Balaji, P. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Balaji, P. V..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Position-wise Fold-Switch Prediction in Metamorphic Proteins: A Comparison of Handcrafted and Language Model Features

In this work, we focus on predicting fold-switching phenomena observed in certain protein structures. Proteins that undergo fold-switching are called metamorphic proteins. We model fold-switch prediction in proteins as a position/residue-wise classification task. We use various features extracted from a protein's sequence as well as structure to train the classifiers. We propose a novel class of handcrafted parametrised features that encode the structural context of a residue. We also use embeddings from existing protein language models (PLMs) to train the classifiers. We train binary and 3-class classifiers, with the 3-class classifiers providing granular information on the type of fold-switch. In our computations, higher classification performance is achieved for binary prediction as compared to 3-class granular prediction. The handcrafted features perform comparably with the PLM embeddings on our standard test set. A rigorous error analysis by us during the review period revealed a critical data-leakage vulnerability in the metamorphic protein test data. This analysis also revealed that the PLM-based classifier suffers sequence-memorisation bias and fails to generalise to novel fold-switching sequences. On the other hand, one of our domain-informed handcrafted feature based classifier detects fold-switching without relying on sequence memory.

bioinformatics↗

Systematic assessment of homology-based methods for fine-grained functional annotation using diverse protein families

The size of the protein sequence database is increasing without a consequent increase in the number of proteins with known molecular function, especially at the fine-grained level. Alignment-based approaches such as BLAST and profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) are widely used to infer homology and transfer annotation to be subsequently confirmed by experiments. The ability of BLASTp to distinguish orthologs from paralogs varies across protein families; for profile HMMs, this depends on the sequences considered for generating multiple sequence alignments. In this study, we systematically evaluated the performance of BLASTp and HMM-based methods for fine-grained function annotation using carefully curated protein datasets that are diverse in sequence-structure-function relationships. Expectedly, BLASTp performed well in detecting close homologs but failed to detect remote homologs. BLASTp detected homology between 22.6% and 100% of sequence pairs within different homologous protein families. The extent of sequence identity between trypsin and chymotrypsin sequences is high despite differences in fine-grained molecular function. Transferring function annotation based on homology inferred from BLASTp leads to errors in trypsin-chymotrypsin-like situations. Profile HMMs improved sensitivity and captured subtle homology signals even when sequence identity was low, though some known family members scored below threshold due to functional divergence or mutations at catalytic sites. We further showed that relying solely on homology for annotation transfer can lead to misleading conclusions when proteins have evolved divergent functions despite structural similarity. Our findings highlight that a cautious approach involving BLASTp, profile HMMs, and expert domain knowledge provides the most reliable strategy for functional annotation. After all, not every family member may be doing what we think they are doing.

bioinformatics↗

How suitable are clustering methods for functional annotation of proteins?

The advent of affordable high-throughput genome sequencing has drastically expanded protein sequence databases, necessitating the development of computational tools to predict protein function from sequence data. Current methods, such as BLASTp and profile HMMs, while effective, are limited by difficulties in detecting remote homologs and uncertainties in multiple sequence alignments. To address this, we explore the use of clustering algorithms for unsupervised protein function annotation, using pseudo-amino acid composition (PAAC) as features. In this study, we evaluated nine clustering algorithms for their ability to segregate protein sequences based on functional differences using the PAAC feature. Using intrinsic metrics, particularly the silhouette coefficient (SC), we determined the optimal number of clusters (k) for each algorithm. We observed that agglomerative clustering produced results resembling phylogenetic relationships; even k-means clustering, Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and spectral clustering do so, but occasionally merge datapoints from distinct original clusters at higher k values. Our findings reveal that k-means clustering, GMM, and agglomerative clustering effectively segregate distinct protein functional families, but effectiveness decreases when distinguishing fine-grained functional differences. Notably, spectral clustering underperformed relative to other methods. Affinity propagation clustering, while effective in some cases, generated more clusters than expected and is prone to false positives. Overall, we find that some of the clustering algorithms are suitable for functional annotation of protein sequences using PAAC as a feature set, even when the number of ground-truth sequences is limited. The implementation of the clustering method for protein sequences is available in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/RakeshBusi/Clustering). It provides comprehensive steps for preprocessing, feature extraction, clustering, and evaluation. All steps are presented in a Jupyter Notebook in the repository. Author SummaryWe are in the age of big data. It is an outcome of the development of high-throughput techniques. The resources spent to develop and deploy such techniques are considerably large. However, data by itself is not an end but a means to answer questions of relevance. Hence, the development and/or customisation of techniques that help us to interpret and utilise data are also important. In this study, we focus on customising a popular technique, namely clustering, to extract biological information from the ever-growing protein sequence database. We test the suitability of nine clustering algorithms to determine a proteins molecular function solely based on its amino acid sequence. Based on our findings, we recommend using a combination of the four algorithms, namely, k-means, Gaussian mixture model, agglomerative, and affinity propagation. However, we note that proteins with subtle functional differences cluster together, and fine-tuning algorithms to separate such proteins requires additional experimental data.

bioinformatics↗

Clues to reaction specificity in PLP-dependent fold type I enzymes of monosaccharide biosynthesis

Novel functions can emerge in an enzyme family while conserving catalytic mechanism, motif or fold. PLP-dependent enzymes have evolved into seven fold-types and catalyse diverse reactions using the same mechanism for the formation of external aldimine. Nucleotide sugar aminotransferases (which will be henceforth referred to as aminotransferases) belong to fold type I and mediate the biosynthesis of several monosaccharides. They use diverse substrates but are highly selective to the C3 or C4 carbon to which amine group is transferred. Profile HMMs were able to identify aminotransferases but could not capture reaction specificity. A search for discriminating features led to the discovery of sequence motifs that are located near the pyranose binding site suggesting their role in imparting reaction specificity. Using a position weight matrix for this motif, we were able to assign reaction specificity to a large number of aminotransferases. Inferences from this analysis set way for future experiments that can shed light on mechanisms of functional diversification in nucleotide sugar aminotransferases of fold type I.

bioinformatics↗

Searching sequence databases for functional homologs using profile HMMs: how to set bit score thresholds?

MotivationUniProt and BFD databases together have 2.5 billion protein sequences. A large majority of these proteins have been electronically annotated. Automated annotation pipelines, vis-a-vis manual curation, have the advantage of scale and speed but are fraught with relatively higher error rates. This is because sequence homology does not necessarily translate to functional homology, molecular function specification is hierarchic and not all functional families have the same amount of experimental data that one can exploit for annotation. Consequently, customization of annotation workflow is inevitable to minimize annotation errors. ResultsWe discuss possible ways of customizing the search of sequence databases for functional homologs using profile HMMs. Choosing an optimal bit score threshold is a critical step in the application of HMMs, which is illustrated using four Case Studies; the single domain nucleotide sugar 6-dehydrogenase and lysozyme-C families, and SH3 and GT-A domains which are typically found as a part of multi-domain proteins. We also discuss the limitations of using profile HMMs for functional annotation and suggests some possible ways to partially overcome such limitations. Supplementary informationSupplementary_material containing Figures S1-S7 and Tables S1 and S2 Supplementary_dataset.xlsx

bioinformatics↗

GlycoPathDB: A database of monosaccharide biosynthesis pathways

A distinctive feature of glycans vis-a-vis proteins and nucleic acids is its structural complexity which arises from the huge repertoire of monosaccharides, isomeric linkages and branching. Around 70 monosaccharides have so far been discovered in natural glycans and the pathway for the biosynthesis of 57 of these have been experimentally characterized. However, there is no common platform with a comprehensive information of monosaccharide pathways and enzymes. We have gathered 542 experimentally characterized enzymes of these pathways from literature and set up a first of its kind database called GlycoPathDB (http://www.bio.iitb.ac.in/glycopathdb/). Annotations such as the reaction catalysed, substrate specificity, biosynthesis pathway and PubMed IDs are provided for all the enzymes in the database. Sequence homologs of the experimentally characterized enzymes found in nearly 13,000 completely sequenced genomes from Bacteria and Archaea have also been included in the database. This platform will help in deduction of evolutionary relationships among enzymes such as aminotransferases, nucleotidyltransferases, acetyltransferases and SDR family enzymes. It can also facilitate experimental studies such as direct enzyme assays to validate putative annotations, establish structure-function relationship, expression profiling to determine the function, determine the phenotypic consequences of gene knock-out/knock-in and complementation studies.

bioinformatics↗

Is there a universal glycan alphabet?

Several monosaccharides constitute naturally occurring glycans but it is uncertain if they constitute a universal set like the alphabets of proteins and DNA. Based on the available experimental observations, it is hypothesized herein that the glycan alphabet is not universal. Data on the presence / absence of pathways for the biosynthesis of 55 monosaccharides in 12939 completely sequenced archaeal and bacterial genomes are presented in support of this hypothesis. Pathways were identified by searching for homologs of biosynthesis pathway enzymes. Substantial variations are observed in the set of monosaccharides used by organisms belonging to the same phylum, genera and even species. Monosaccharides are grouped as Common, Less Common and Rare based on their prevalence in Archaea and Bacteria. It is observed that fewer enzymes suffice to biosynthesize the Common group. It appears that the Common group originated before the formation of three domains of life. In contrast, the Rare group are confined to a few species in a few phyla, suggesting that they evolved much later. Fold conservation, as observed in aminotransferases and SDR superfamily members involved in monosaccharide biosynthesis, suggests neo- and sub-functionalization of genes leading to the formation of Rare group monosaccharides. Non-universality of the glycan alphabet begets questions about the role of different monosaccharides in determining an organisms fitness. Impact statementCarbohydrates, nucleic acids and proteins are important classes of biological macromolecules. The universality of DNA, RNA and protein alphabets has been established beyond doubt. However, the universality of glycan alphabet is unknown primarily because of the challenges associated with the elucidation of glycan structures. This has precluded a comprehensive investigation of glycan alphabet. To address this challenge, we have identified the prevalence of 55 monosaccharide biosynthesis pathways in 12939 completely sequenced archaeal and bacterial genomes by searching for homologs of biosynthesis pathway enzymes using HMM profiles, and in a few cases, BLASTp. This revealed that the glycan alphabet is highly variable; in fact, significant differences are found even among different strains of a species. Possible implications of this variability may be significant in understanding the evolution of Archaea and Bacteria in diverse and competitive environments. Factors that drive the choice of monosaccharides used by an organism need to be investigated, and will be of interest in understanding host-pathogen interactions. Additionally, the knowledge of glycan alphabet can be employed for structural characterization / validation of glycans inferred using mass spectrometry. Knowledge of unique monosaccharides and biosynthetic enzymes can also be used as novel drug targets against human pathogens. Data summaryThe curated set of proteins used in this study, with domain assignment, is listed in supplementary_data.xlsx. Corresponding 396 references with evidence of experimental characterization are included in supplementary material. Results of genome scan which include predictions of monosaccharides as well as the biosynthesis pathway enzymes is available at http://www.bio.iitb.ac.in/glycopathdb/ including the aforementioned information. Python script used to scan genomes to search for monosaccharide biosynthesis pathways are available on request.

genomics↗

Highly clade-specific biosynthesis of rhamnose: present in all plants and in only 42% of prokaryotes.Only Pseudomonas uses both D- and L-rhamnose

Rhamnose is a constituent of lipo- and capsular polysaccharides, and cell surface glycoproteins. L-rhamnose is biosynthesized by the rml or udp pathway and D-rhamnose by the gdp pathway. Disruption of its biosynthesis affects survival, colonisation, etc. Rhamnosides are commercially important in pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries. HMM profiles were used to investigate the prevalence of the three pathways in completely sequenced genomes and metagenomes. The three pathways are mutually exclusive except in Pseudomonas which has both rml and gdp pathways. The rml pathway is restricted to bacteria (42% genomes), archaea (21%) and bacteriophages, and absent in eukaryotes and other viruses. The gdp pathway is restricted to Pseudomonas and Aneurinibacillus. The udp pathway is primarily found in plants, fungi and algae, and in human faecal metagenomic samples. The rml pathway is found in >40% genomes of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Crenarchaeota, Cyanobacteria, Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria but in <20% genomes of Chlamydiae, Euryarchaeota and Tenericutes. The udp pathway is found in all genomes of Streptophyta, <=25% genomes of Ascomycota and Chordata, and none of the genomes of Arthropoda and Basidiomycota. Some genera which lack any of these pathways are Chlamydia, Helicobacter, Listeria, Mycoplasma, Pasteurella, Rickettsia and Staphylococcus. Organisms such as E. coli and Salmonella enterica showed significant strain-specific differences in the presence/absence of rhamnose pathways. Identification of rhamnose biosynthesis genes facilitates profiling their expression pattern, and in turn, better understanding the physiological role of rhamnose. Knowledge of phylogenetic distribution of biosynthesis pathways helps in fine graining the taxonomic profiling of metagenomes. AUTHOR SUMMARYIn the present study, we have investigated the prevalence of rhamnose biosynthesis pathways in completely sequenced genomes and metagenomes. It is observed that the prevalence of rhamnose is highly clade specific: present in all plants but in less than half of all prokaryotes. Among chordates, only the Chinese rufous horseshoe bat has rhamnose biosynthesis pathway and this exclusive presence is quite baffling. The effect of disrupting rhamnose biosynthesis has been reported in a few prokaryotes and all these cases pointed to the essentiality of rhamnose for critical physiological processes such as survival, colonisation, etc. In this background, it is surprising that many of the prokaryotes such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica show significant strain-specific differences in the presence/absence of rhamnose pathway. This study will facilitate the experimental characterization of rhamnose biosynthesis genes in organisms where this pathway has not been characterised yet, eventually leading to the elucidation of the biological role of rhamnose. Phylum-, genus-, species- and strain-level differences found with respect to presence of rhamnose biosynthesis pathway genes can be used as a tool for taxonomic profiling of metagenome samples. This study could also annotate a significant number of orphan proteins in the TrEMBL database.

genomics↗