bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bagri, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Bagri, S..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Mutations in severe human H5N1 cases facilitate evasion from human mucus and antivirals

In late 2024, two individuals in Canada and the United States were treated in intensive care for acute respiratory distress caused by infection with the avian Influenza A Virus H5N1 2.3.4.4b genotype D1.1. Viral sequence data obtained from sampling these patients indicated mixed alleles at haemagglutinin (HA) positions 190 and 226. Mutations at these positions are key determinants of HA usage of 2,6-linked sialic acids (SA), the most abundant influenza receptors in human upper respiratory tracts. Thus, these mutations raised concerns about human adaptation and pandemic potential of the H5N1 virus. In this study, we investigated the impact of the mutations at residues 190 and 226 in H5 HA. We studied the receptor binding properties, cell entry phenotypes and fitness impacts of the mutations using recombinant proteins, pseudotyped lentiviruses, and in the context of influenza viruses using reverse genetics. The mutations did not confer any detectable 2,6-linked sialic acid receptor usage either alone or in combination. Rather, viruses carrying these mutations exhibit weakened binding towards 2,3-linked sialic acid receptors. This correlated with an enhanced capacity to evade human airway mucus, and a reduced susceptibility to oseltamivir and zanamivir. This research underscores that in addition to the way HA interacts with SA as entry receptors, other factors that impact the HA/NA balance might influence the evolutionary trajectory of a zoonotic virus in the human respiratory tract. This study presents a new paradigm for the evolutionary drivers of HA, where reduced sialic acid binding can serve as an advantage for escape from host barriers and antivirals.

microbiology↗

TRF2 Non-Telomeric Function is Indispensable for Neural stemness

Depletion of TRF2 from chromosome ends results in telomeric fusions and genome instability in mammals. Here we show that although TRF2 is indispensable for the proliferation and survival of mouse neural stem cells (mNSCs), surprisingly, this is due to non-telomeric transcriptional function of TRF2, and not telomere protection. Complementing recent work showing TRF2 is dispensable for telomere protection in pluripotent stem cells. Deletion of TRF2 in adult mNSCs (TRF2fl/fl, Nestin-Cre) resulted in markedly reduced proliferation and impaired differentiation into neurons. However, telomere dysregulation-induced DNA damage was not observed, as indicated by the unaltered DNA damage response. Similarly, in SH-SY5Y cells, TRF2 depletion induced differentiation without causing telomere dysfunction. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 directly binds to the promoters of key genes that regulate differentiation. TRF2-dependent recruitment of the polycomb repressor complex (PRC2) and subsequent H3K27 trimethylation repress differentiation-associated genes, thereby maintaining NSC identity. Interestingly, G-quadruplex (G4) motifs are necessary for TRF2 binding. Disrupting the TRF2-G4 interaction-- either through G4-binding ligands or the G4-specific helicase DHX36--induces differentiation genes, thereby promoting neurogenesis. These findings reveal a pivotal non-telomeric role of TRF2 in NSC survival, providing key mechanistic insights into neurogenesis with implications for aging-related neurodegeneration.

molecular biology↗

Artificially inserted G-quadruplex DNA secondary structures induce long-distance chromatin activation

Although the role of G-quadruplex (G4) DNA structures has been suggested in chromosomal looping this was not tested directly. Here, to test causal function, an array of G4s, or control sequence that does not form G4s, were inserted within chromatin in cells. In vivo G4 formation of the inserted G4 sequence array, and not the control sequence, was confirmed using G4-selective antibody. Compared to the control insert, we observed a remarkable increase in the number of 3D chromatin looping interactions from the inserted G4 array. This was evident within the immediate topologically associated domain (TAD) and throughout the genome. Locally, recruitment of enhancer histone marks and the transcriptional coactivator p300/Acetylated-p300 increased in the G4-array, but not in the control insertion. Resulting promoter-enhancer interactions and gene activation were clear up to 5 Mb away from the insertion site. Together, these show the causal role of G4s in enhancer function and long-range chromatin interactions. Mechanisms of 3D topology are primarily based on DNA-bound architectural proteins that induce/stabilize long-range interactions. Involvement of the underlying intrinsic DNA sequence/structure in 3D looping shown here therefore throws new light on how long-range chromosomal interactions might be induced or maintained.

molecular biology↗

Telomeres control regulation of the human Telomerase (hTERT) gene through non-telomeric TRF2 and independent of Telomere looping

The function of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in the synthesis and maintenance of chromosome ends, or telomeres, is widely understood. Whether and how telomeres, on the other hand, influence hTERT regulation is relatively less studied. We found hTERT was transcriptionally altered depending on telomere length (TL). This resulted from TL-dependent binding of TRF2 between telomeres and the hTERT promoter. hTERT promoter-bound TRF2 was non-telomeric and did not involve the looping of telomeres to the hTERT promoter. Cell lines from different tissue types (fibrosarcoma (HT1080), colon cancer (HCT116), and breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), engineered for either telomere elongation/shortening gave increase/decrease in hTERT, respectively. Mechanistically, we show hTERT promoter-bound non-telomeric TRF2 recruits the canonical PRC2-complex inducing repressor histone H3K27-trimethylation in a TL-dependent fashion. This was further supported by TL-dependent promoter activity from an exogenously inserted hTERT reporter. Increase in TL over days followed by gradual decline, resulted in activation followed by repression of hTERT in a concerted manner, further implicating TL as a key factor for hTERT regulation. Notably on reprogramming primary fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), TRF2 loss from the hTERT promoter was evident along with telomere elongation and hTERT upregulation. Conversely, on telomere shortening in iPSCs, hTERT promoter-bound TRF2 was restored with marked reduction in hTERT further supporting the causal role of TL in hTERT transcription. Mechanisms of tight control of hTERT by TL shown here are likely to have major implications in telomere-related physiologies, particularly, cancer, ageing and pluripotency. TeaserTelomere length controls hTERT expression by modulating TRF2 distribution and PRC2-mediated repression, highlighting a self-regulatory mechanism in cancer.

cancer biology↗

Telomere-Dependent Interleukin-1 Receptor Activation Promotes Immune Suppression in Triple-Negative-Breast Cancer

Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (Telomeric Repeat binding Factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8 and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.

cancer biology↗

Human Telomerase Expression is under Direct Transcriptional Control of the Telomere-binding-factor TRF2

Tight regulatory mechanisms to maintain repression of human Telomerase (hTERT), the sole protein that synthesizes telomeres, is crucial for normal adult somatic cells. In contrast, enhanced telomerase activity and resulting pathological maintenance of telomeres, is widely understood as causal in >90% of human cancers. These implicate underlying mechanisms connecting hTERT regulation and telomeres, possibly through telomeric proteins, that remain unclear. In light of of recent work by us and others showing non-telomeric function of the telomere-binding protein TRF2, here we examined whether and how TRF2 affected hTERT regulation. Direct binding of TRF2 - spanning [~]450 bp of the hTERT promoter from the Transcriptional Start Site (TSS) - led to TRF2-dependent recruitment of the polycomb repressor complex PRC2 in both normal and cancer cells. This induced repressor histone modifications resulting in TRF2-dependent hTERT repression. Mutations in the hTERT promoter, found frequently in aggressive glioblastoma and reported to destabilize the G-quadruplex structure, resulted in loss of TRF2 binding and consequent hTERT over-expression. Conversely, using G-quadruplex-stabilizing ligands we regained TRF2 binding, hTERT re-suppression, in highly proliferating glioblastoma cells with telomerase hyperactivation due to hTERT promoter mutations. Together, results herein demonstrate direct control of hTERT through TRF2 in a G-quadruplex-dependent manner - implicating mechanisms of how telomerase regulation might be linked to telomeres in normal and cancer cells.

cancer biology↗