bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Azodi, C. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Azodi, C. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evolutionary characteristics of intergenic transcribed regions indicate widespread noisy transcription in the Poaceae

Extensive transcriptional activity occurring in unannotated, intergenic regions of genomes has raised the question whether intergenic transcription represents the activity of novel genes or noisy expression. To address this, we evaluated cross-species and post-duplication sequence and expression conservation of intergenic transcribed regions (ITRs) in four Poaceae species. Most ITR sequences are species-specific. Those found across species tend to be more divergent in expression and have more recent duplicates compared to annotated genes. To assess if ITRs are functional (under selection), machine learning models were established in Oryza sativa (rice) that could distinguish between benchmark functional (phenotype genes) and nonfunctional (pseudogenes) sequences with high accuracy based on 44 evolutionary and biochemical features. Based on the prediction models, 584 rice ITRs (8%) are classified as likely functional that tend to have conserved expression and ancient retained duplicates. However, most ITRs do not exhibit sequence or expression conservation across species or following duplication, consistent with computational predictions that suggest 61% ITRs are not under selection. We outline key evolutionary characteristics that are tightly associated with likely-functional ITRs and provide a framework to identify novel genes to improve genome annotation and move toward connecting genotype to phenotype in crop and model systems.

genomics

Asymmetric evolution of the transcription profiles and cis-regulatory sites contributes to the retention of transcription factor duplicates

Transcription factors (TFs) play a key role in regulating plant development and response to environmental stimuli. While most genes revert to single copy after a duplication event, transcription factors are retained at a significantly higher rate. However, it is unclear why TF duplicates have higher rates of retention relative to other genes. In this study, we compared three types of features (expression, sequence, and conservation) of retained TFs following whole genome duplication (WGD) events to genes with other functions, using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model. We found that gene function groups with higher maximum expression but lower mean expression tended to have higher duplicate retention rate post WGD, though TFs in particular are retained more often than would be expected based on the features examined. Conversely, expression of individual genes was not associated with duplication, but sequence conservation was. Furthermore, we found that the evolution of TF expression patterns and cis-regulatory cites favors the partitioning of ancestral states among the resulting duplicates. In particular, we found that one duplicate retains the majority of ancestral expression and cis-regulatory sites, while the \"non-ancestral\" duplicate was enriched for novel regulatory sites. To investigate how this pattern of partitioning pattern evolved, we modeled the retention of ancestral states in duplicate pairs using a system of differential equations. Our findings indicate that duplicate pairs evolve to a partitioned state more often than away from it, which in combination with accumulation of new regulatory sites in non-ancestral duplicates, suggest that selection favors partitioning via neofunctionalization.\n\nAuthor SummaryGene expression is controlled by regulatory proteins known as transcription factors. These factors control how an organism develops and responds to its environment. The evolution of transcription factor functions also contributes to the emergence of new species and crop domestication. In plants, new transcription factors mainly arise due to polyploidy, multiplication of the genome. Although most duplicated copies are lost following a genome duplication event, transcription factors are exceptional because they are often kept. Furthermore, we found that transcription factor duplicates that tend to diverge in how they are expressed and regulated in an unusual way where one copy mirrors the original, pre-duplication functional states of the ancestral gene, while the other loses the ancestral status and instead accumulates novel regulatory sites. Our results suggest these duplicate transcription factors may have been kept because one copy preserve ancestral function while the other has evolved new ones.

evolutionary biology