bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Azeredo da Silveira, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Azeredo da Silveira, R..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Joint visual-vestibular computation of head direction and reflexive eye movement

Several cognitive maps have been identified, but what sensory signals drive them and how these are combined are not well understood. One such map, the head-direction representation, is believed to be primarily driven by vestibular motion signals in mammals. Here, we combine in vivo imaging of neuronal activity, genetic perturbation of neuronal circuits, behavioral testing, and theoretical modeling to show that the representation of head direction in mouse is driven by not only vestibular but also visual motion signals: both are essential, and the latter, originating in direction-selective retinal ganglion cell activity, dominates at low speeds. We show that, correspondingly, visual perturbations alter navigational behavior that relies on head-direction computation. Finally, we find that head-direction representation and the slow phase of reflexive eye movement are tightly correlated, and we propose a theoretical model that elucidates their emergence from coupled visual and vestibular processes. Our results suggest that the brains estimate of head direction is built on an oculomotor reflex pathway driven by both visual and vestibular signals.

neuroscience↗

Universal statistics of hippocampal place fields across species and dimensionalities

Hippocampal place cells form a spatial map by selectively firing at specific locations in an animals environment1. Until recently the hippocampus appeared to implement a simple coding scheme for position, in which each neuron is assigned to a single region of space in which it is active1. Recently, new experiments revealed that the tuning of hippocampal neurons to space is much less stereotyped than previously thought: in large environments, place cells are active in multiple locations and their fields vary in shape and size across locations, with distributions that differ substantially in different experiments2-7. It is unknown whether these seemingly diverse observations can be explained in a unified manner, and whether the heterogeneous statistics can reveal the mechanisms that determine the tuning of neural activity to position. Here we show that a surprisingly simple mathematical model, in which firing fields are generated by thresholding a realization of a random Gaussian process, explains the statistical properties of neural activity in quantitative detail, in bats and rodents, and in one-, two-, and three-dimensional environments of varying sizes. The model captures the statistics of field arrangements, and further yields quantitative predictions on the statistics of field shapes and topologies, which we verify. Thus, the seemingly diverse statistics arise from mathematical principles that are common to different species and behavioral conditions. The underlying Gaussian statistics are compatible with a picture in which the synaptic connections between place cells and their inputs are random and highly unstructured.

neuroscience↗

Jointly efficient encoding and decoding in neural populations

The efficient coding approach proposes that neural systems represent as much sensory information as biological constraints allow. It aims at formalizing encoding as a constrained optimal process. A different approach, that aims at formalizing decoding, proposes that neural systems instantiate a generative model of the sensory world. Here, we put forth a normative framework that characterizes neural systems as jointly optimizing encoding and decoding. It takes the form of a variational autoencoder: sensory stimuli are encoded in the noisy activity of neurons to be interpreted by a flexible decoder; encoding must allow for an accurate stimulus reconstruction from neural activity. Jointly, neural activity is required to represent the statistics of latent features which are mapped by the decoder into distributions over sensory stimuli; decoding correspondingly optimizes the accuracy of the generative model. This framework yields in a family of encoding-decoding models, which result in equally accurate generative models, indexed by a measure of the stimulus-induced deviation of neural activity from the marginal distribution over neural activity. Each member of this family predicts a specific relation between properties of the sensory neurons--such as the arrangement of the tuning curve means (preferred stimuli) and widths (degrees of selectivity) in the population--as a function of the statistics of the sensory world. Our approach thus generalizes the efficient coding approach. Notably, here, the form of the constraint on the optimization derives from the requirement of an accurate generative model, while it is arbitrary in efficient coding models. Moreover, solutions do not require the knowledge of the stimulus distribution, but are learned on the basis of data samples; the constraint further acts as regularizer, allowing the model to generalize beyond the training data. Finally, we characterize the family of models we obtain through alternate measures of performance, such as the error in stimulus reconstruction. We find that a range of models admits comparable performance; in particular, a population of sensory neurons with broad tuning curves as observed experimentally yields both low reconstruction stimulus error and an accurate generative model that generalizes robustly to unseen data. Author summaryOur brain represents the sensory world in the activity of populations of neurons. Two theories have addressed the nature of these representations. The first theory--efficient coding--posits that neurons encode as much information as possible about sensory stimuli, subject to resource constraints such as limits on energy consumption. The second one--generative modeling--focuses on decoding, and is organized around the idea that neural activity plays the role of a latent variable from which sensory stimuli can be simulated. Our work subsumes the two approaches in a unifying framework based on the mathematics of variational autoencoders. Unlike in efficient coding, which assumes full knowledge of stimulus statistics, here representations are learned from examples, in a joint optimization of encoding and decoding. This new framework yields a range of optimal representations, corresponding to different models of neural selectivity and reconstruction performances, depending on the resource constraint. The form of the constraint is not arbitrary but derives from the optimization framework, and its strength tunes the ability of the model to generalize beyond the training example. Central to the approach, and to the nature of the representations it implies, is the interplay of encoding and decoding, itself central to brain processing.

neuroscience↗

Fixational eye movements as active sensation for high visual acuity

Perception and action are inherently entangled: our world view is shaped by how we explore and navigate our environment through complex and variable self-motion. Even when fixating on a stable stimulus, our eyes undergo small, involuntary movements. Fixational eye movements (FEM) render a stable world jittery on our retinae, which contributes noise to neural coding. Yet, empirical evidence suggests that FEM help rather than harm human perception of fine detail. Here, we elucidate this paradox by uncovering under which conditions FEM improve or impair retinal coding and human acuity. We combine theory and experiment: model accuracy is directly compared to that of healthy human subjects in a visual acuity task. Acuity is modeled by applying an ideal Bayesian classifier to simulations of retinal spiking activity in the presence of FEM. In addition, empirical FEM are monitored using high-resolution eye-tracking by an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope. While FEM introduce noise, they also effectively pre-process visual inputs to facilitate retinal information encoding. Based on an interplay of these mechanisms, our model predicts a relation between visual acuity, FEM amplitude, and single-trial stimulus size that quantitatively accounts for experimental observations and captures the beneficial effect of FEM. Moreover, we observe that human subjects FEM statistics vary with stimulus size, and our model suggests that changing eye motion amplitude, as the subjects indeed do, enhances acuity as compared to maintaining eye motion size constant. Overall, our findings indicate that perception benefits from action even at the fine and noise-dominated spatio-temporal scale of FEM. Significance StatementPerception is inherently active: we need to move our eyes to see the world around us. Yet our eyes also undergo tiny, unconscious movements that can blur out fine visual details. Paradoxically, previous work suggested that these small movements aid fine detail perception. Here, we investigate this paradox to uncover in which contexts small eye movements help or harm visual acuity. Comparing a model of retinal responses with recordings of human visual acuity, we elucidate the mechanisms by which and conditions in which small eye movements support fine detail discrimination. Our results also suggest that varying eye movement amplitude according to stimulus size enhances retinal coding, highlighting that perception is active even at the level of very fine eye movements.

neuroscience↗

Random Compressed Coding with Neurons

Classical models of efficient coding in neurons assume simple mean responses-- tuning curves--such as bellshaped or monotonic functions of a stimulus feature. Real neurons, however, can be more complex: grid cells, for example, exhibit periodic responses which impart the neural population code with high accuracy. But do highly accurate codes require fine tuning of the response properties? We address this question with the use of a benchmark model: a neural network with random synaptic weights which result in output cells with irregular tuning curves. Irregularity enhances the local resolution of the code but gives rise to catastrophic, global errors. For optimal smoothness of the tuning curves, when local and global errors balance out, the neural network compresses information from a high-dimensional representation to a low-dimensional one, and the resulting distributed code achieves exponential accuracy. An analysis of recordings from monkey motor cortex points to such compressed efficient coding. Efficient codes do not require a finely tuned design--they emerge robustly from irregularity or randomness.

neuroscience↗

Human inference in changing environments

To make informed decisions in natural environments that change over time, humans must update their beliefs as new observations are gathered. Studies exploring human inference as a dynamical process that unfolds in time have focused on situations in which the statistics of observations are history-independent. Yet temporal structure is everywhere in nature, and yields history-dependent observations. Do humans modify their inference processes depending on the latent temporal statistics of their observations? We investigate this question experimentally and theoretically using a change-point inference task. We show that humans adapt their inference process to fine aspects of the temporal structure in the statistics of stimuli. As such, humans behave qualitatively in a Bayesian fashion, but, quantitatively, deviate away from optimality. Perhaps more importantly, humans behave suboptimally in that their responses are not deterministic, but variable. We show that this variability itself is modulated by the temporal statistics of stimuli. To elucidate the cognitive algorithm that yields this behavior, we investigate a broad array of existing and new models that characterize different sources of suboptimal deviations away from Bayesian inference. While models with output noise that corrupts the response-selection process are natural candidates, human behavior is best described by sampling-based inference models, in which the main ingredient is a compressed approximation of the posterior, represented through a modest set of random samples and updated over time. This result comes to complement a growing literature on sample-based representation and learning in humans.

neuroscience↗