bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Azeloglu, E. U.

Publications and source records attributed to Azeloglu, E. U..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Validating Antibodies for Quantitative Western Blot Measurements with Microwestern Array

Western blotting is often considered a semi-quantitative or even qualitative assay for assessing changes in protein or protein post-translational modification levels. Fluorescence-based measurement enables acquisition of quantitative data in principal, but requires determining the linear range of detection for each antibody--a labor-intensive task. Here, we describe the use of a high-throughput western blotting technique called microwestern array to more rapidly evaluate suitable conditions for quantitative western blotting with particular antibodies. We can evaluate up to 192 antibody/dilution/replicate combinations on a single standard size gel with a seven-point, two-fold lysate dilution series (~100-fold range). Pilot experiments demonstrate a surprisingly high proportion of investigated antibodies (17/22) are suitable for quantitative use, and that lack of validity might often be a consequence of lysate composition rather than antibody quality. Linear range for all validated antibodies is at least 8-fold, and in some cases nearly two orders of magnitude. That range could be greater as the presented tests did not find a limit for many antibodies. We find that phospho-specific and total antibodies do not have discernable trend differences in linear range or limit of detection, but total antibodies generally required higher working concentrations, suggesting phospho-specific antibodies may be generally higher affinity. Importantly, we demonstrate that results from microwestern analyses scale to normal \"macro\" western for a subset of antibodies. These data indicate that with initial validation, many antibodies can be readily used quantitatively in a reproducible manner. Antibody validation data and standard operating procedures are available online (www.birtwistlelab.com/protocols and www.dtoxs.org).

biochemistry

A Comparison of mRNA Sequencing with Random Primed and 3’-Directed Libraries

Deep mRNA sequencing (mRNAseq) is the state-of-the-art for whole transcriptome measurements. A key step is creating a library of cDNA sequencing fragments from RNA. This is generally done by random priming, creating multiple sequencing fragments along the length of each transcript. A 3 end-focused library approach cannot detect differential splicing, but has potentially higher throughput at lower cost (~10-fold lower), along with the ability to improve quantification by using transcript molecule counting with unique molecular identifiers (UMI) to correct for PCR bias. Here, we compare implementation of such a 3-digital gene expression (3-DGE) approach with \"conventional\" random primed mRNAseq, which has not yet been done. We find that while conventional mRNAseq detects ~15% more genes, the resulting lists of differentially expressed genes and therefore biological conclusions and gene signatures are highly concordant between the two techniques. We also find good quantitative agreement on the level of individual genes between the two techniques in terms of both read counts and fold change between two conditions. We conclude that for high-throughput applications, the potential cost savings associated with the 3-DGE approach are a very reasonable tradeoff for modest reduction in sensitivity and inability to observe alternative splicing, and should enable much larger scale studies focused on not only differential expression analysis, but also quantitative transcriptome profiling. The computational scripts and programs, along with experimental standard operating procedures used in our pipeline presented here, are freely available on our website (www.dtoxs.org).

genomics