Biology subjects

Aykul, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Aykul, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

CryoEM structure of ALK2:BMP6 reveals distinct mechanisms that allow ALK2 to interact with both BMP and Activin ligands

Ligands in the TGF{beta} family (activins, BMPs and TGF{beta}s), signal by bringing together two type I and two type II receptors. ALK2 is the only type I receptor among the seven TGF{beta} type I receptors that interacts with both activin and BMP ligands. With BMPs, ALK2 acts as a signaling receptor to activate SMAD1/5/8 signaling. Alternatively, with activins, such as Activin A (ActA), ALK2 forms nonsignaling complexes that negatively regulate ALK2 and ActA signaling. To gain insight into how ALK2 interacts with two distinct classes of ligands, we resolved the cryoelectron microscopy structure of ALK2 in complex with the type II receptor, ActRIIB, and the ligand, BMP6, in parallel with the corresponding structure with ALK3 for direct comparison. These structures demonstrate that ALK2 and ALK3 utilize different mechanisms to interact with BMP6 at the wrist interface, with ALK2 relying on BMP6 glycosylation and ALK3 relying on a salt bridge. Modeling of ALK2:ActA reveals that binding relies on ActAs fingertip region, mirroring the interaction of ActA with its other receptor, ALK4. Our results demonstrate that ALK2 is a hybrid receptor that incorporates features of BMP type I receptors such as ALK3 at the wrist interface, and an activin type I receptor such as ALK4 at the fingertip. SignificanceALK2 interacts with two different classes of TGF{beta} ligands: the BMPs and the activins. With BMP ligands, ALK2 signals to play roles in bone modeling, while with activins, ALK2 negatively regulates signaling by forming nonsignaling complexes. We demonstrate that ALK2 binds to favored ligand, BMP6, by utilizing the ligand wrist-helix stabilized by a glycosylation, rather than a charged interaction observed with similar receptor, ALK3. We also show that ALK2 interaction with activin ligand, ActA, is reliant on a single interaction at the other side of the receptor - the fingertip interface. Thus, this study elucidates first structure of ALK2 in complex with a ligand and provides the molecular insight into how ALK2 is able to bind to BMP and activin ligands.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2024

Lysosomal degradation of ACVR1-Activin complexes negatively regulates signaling of Activins and Bone Morphogenetic Proteins

BMP/TGF{beta} family ligands act mainly as factors that differentially initiate Smad1/5/8 or Smad2/3 signaling via heterotetrameric complexes comprised of two type I and two type II receptors (IIR). ActA (ActA) stands out as it activates Smad2/3 signaling through type I receptor ACVR1B, whereas it generates non-signaling complexes (NSCs) with ACVR1. In fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), a genetic disorder caused by missense mutations in ACVR1 (ACVR1.FOP), ACVR1.FOP*ActA*IIR complexes activate Smad1/5 signaling, mimicking those formed with BMPs. As the NSCs that ActA forms with ACVR1 are stoichiometrically identical with signaling complexes formed with ACVR1.FOP, we explored how NSCs differ from their signaling counterparts. We show that ACVR1*ActA*IIR complexes rapidly traffic to lysosomes, where their constituent components are degraded, reducing the cells responsiveness to BMPs along with ActAs availability. This property is specific to ActA as Activin B, AB, and AC do not form lysosomal trafficking complexes with ACVR1, but rather remain on the surface as NSCs. Lysosomal trafficking and degradation of ACVR1*ActA*IIR complexes is a novel regulatory mechanism of BMP/TGF{beta} signaling whose physiological roles remain largely unexplored.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

ACVR1 antibodies exacerbate heterotopic ossification in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) by activating FOP-mutant ACVR1

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare genetic disorder whose most debilitating pathology is progressive and cumulative heterotopic ossification (HO) of skeletal muscles, ligaments, tendons, and fascia. FOP is caused by mutations in the type I BMP receptor gene ACVR1, which enable ACVR1 to utilize its natural antagonist, Activin A, as an agonistic ligand. The physiological relevance of this property is underscored by the fact that HO in FOP is exquisitely dependent on activation of FOP-mutant ACVR1 by Activin A, an effect countered by inhibition of Activin A via monoclonal antibody treatment. Hence, we surmised that ACVR1 antibodies that block activation of ACVR1 by ligand should also inhibit HO in FOP and provide an additional therapeutic option for this condition. Therefore, we generated ACVR1 monoclonal antibodies that block ACVR1s activation by its ligands. Surprisingly, in vivo, these ACVR1 antibodies stimulate HO and activate signaling of FOP-mutant ACVR1. This property is restricted to FOP-mutant ACVR1 and results from ACVR1 antibody-mediated dimerization of ACVR1. Conversely, wild type ACVR1 is inhibited by ACVR1 antibodies. These results uncover an additional novel property of FOP-mutant ACVR1 and indicate that ACVR1 antibodies should not be considered as therapeutics for FOP.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2020

TGF-β Family Inhibitors Blunt Adipogenesis Via Non-Canonical Regulation Of SMAD Pathways

Adipose tissues (AT) expand in response to energy surplus through adipocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia (i.e., adipogenesis). The latter is a process by which multipotent precursors differentiate into mature adipocytes. This process is directed by growth factors and cytokines, including members of the TGF-{beta} family, which regulate intracellular signaling pathways that control adipogenic transcriptional programs. As ectopic adipogenesis has been linked with metabolic syndrome and other pathological conditions, we undertook to establish how TGF-{beta} family growth factors and their inhibitors regulate this process in a 3T3-L1 adipogenesis model. We found that intracellular SMAD1/5/8 signaling pathways are activated while SMAD2/3 pathways are suppressed in differentiating cells. Addition of SMAD1/5/8 pathway activating ligands promoted cell proliferation, while SMAD2/3 pathway activating ligands suppressed adipocyte formation. We identified several ligand traps that blunted 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. Strikingly, anti-adipogenic traps and ligands exploited the same mechanism of regulation involving a negative feedback loop that links SMAD2/3 activation with SMAD1/5/8 hyper-phosphorylation, cytoplasmic retention, and reduced signaling. The identified anti-adipogenic traps could be used to control hyperplastic AT expansion and its associated pathological conditions.

molecular biology↗