bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Audet, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Audet, T..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Condition manipulation reveals an increase in sex-specific additive genetic variance, and reduced intersex genetic covariances in Drosophila prolongata, a species with sexual trait exaggeration

The between sex genetic correlation for traits has long been hypothesized as a constraint to the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Both empirical and theoretical work has suggested that this constraint is influenced by genotype-sex-environment interactions. We examine genotype-sex-environment interactions in both sexually exaggerated and non-exaggerated legs of Drosophila prolongata, to examine the role of organismal condition on evolvability of an extreme trait. We employed a nested full-sib half-sib crossing design, providing food either ad libitum, or restricting food during larval growth, to each brood. When provided food ad libitum, inter-sex genetic correlations between traits is high and positive, whereas under food restriction this correlation substantially weakens, with a modest negative sign. Similarly, comparisons of the G matrix across sexes becomes less associated under food restriction. We discuss these results in the context of the growing appreciation of the factors that facilitate sex-specific evolutionary change.

evolutionary biology↗

Genetic architecture of the developing forelegs of Drosophila prolongata; an exaggerated weapon and ornament

Extreme secondary sexual traits are some of the most striking phenotypes in nature. Studies on the genetics of these phenotypes have largely focused on within-species functional analyses of signalling pathways. Although useful, these do not provide insight into the evolutionary mechanisms that occur during the evolution of trait exaggeration. Drosophila prolongata offers an exceptional opportunity to explore the evolution of trait exaggeration, as it is the only species in the melanogaster species group with male-specific foreleg size exaggeration under both intra- and intersexual selection. Here, we used sex-specific RNA-seq from fore- and midleg tissues during early development and after initiation of sexually dimorphic growth between these tissues in D. prolongata. We also sampled the same developmental stages in D. carrolli ([~]4MYA divergence) and D. melanogaster ([~]20MYA). Using comparisons of gene expression between sexes, species, tissues, and developmental stages, we found a positive relationship between the number, but not the magnitude of differential expression of sex-biased genes, with the extent of phenotypic dimorphism. One gene with a large effect, grain, caused D. prolongata-like leg size phenotypes in D. melanogaster legs when knocked down. We further found only modest changes to magnitude and direction of expression differences in signalling pathways previously implicated in sexually dimorphic evolution. This suggests that these pathways regulating trait expression and dimorphism but may not be primary drivers of their phenotypic evolution. Significance statementHow sexes evolve distinct forms while developing from a shared genome continues to be incompletely resolved. We explore a sexually dimorphic exaggerated trait, enlarged forelegs in Drosophila prolongata, and compare changes in sex-biased gene expression between tissues and developmental stages in D. prolongata and two closely related species without foreleg exaggeration. We show that major developmental pathways dont appear to change substantially in their direction or magnitude of expression between species. We further show a transcription factor, grain, that when knocked-down, induces D. prolongata leg-like phenotypes in D. melanogaster at low penetrance. Our results suggest that despite large morphological differences and patterns of dimorphism, gene expression changes between the developing tissues may be more modest than previously thought.

evolutionary biology↗

The role of resource defensibility in facilitating sexually-selected weapon evolution: An experimental evolution test

Animal weapons have evolved multiple times primarily for battling for access to mates. Despite intra-sexual selection being common, weapon evolution has evolved relatively rarely. So why do weapons not evolve more commonly? It has been hypothesized that three precursors are necessary for the initiation of weapon evolution: high variance in reproductive success, patchy high-value resources, and spatial environments conducive to one-on-one competition. Here, we test this hypothesis by performing experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster, utilizing heterogeneous environments where conditions facilitating territorial defense and opportunities for competitive interactions vary. We examine changes in sexually dimorphic morphology and male aggression that are predicted to occur, based on this model. We also examine whether condition dependence for sexual dimorphism has evolved after 35 and 75 generations of experimental evolution. Aggression did increase, albeit modestly, in environments that facilitate resource defense. Morphological changes are modest although with some trait specific changes to allometry, generally in the opposite direction of our predictions. Condition dependence trends in the opposite direction from those predicted by our hypothesis as well. We discuss our results in the context of the necessary conditions for the evolution of weapons, and if, and when condition dependence of trait exaggeration may evolve.

evolutionary biology↗

Sexually discordant selection is associated with trait specific morphological changes and a complex genomic response

Sexes often have differing fitness optima, potentially generating intra-locus sexual conflict, as each sex bears a genetic load of alleles beneficial to the other sex. One strategy to evaluate conflict in the genome is to artificially select populations discordantly, against established sexual dimorphism, reintroducing attenuated conflict. We investigate a long-term artificial selection experiment reversing sexual size dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster during [~]350 generations of sexually discordant selection. We explore morphological and genomic changes to identify loci under selection between the sexes in discordantly and concordantly size selected treatments. Despite substantial changes to overall size, concordant selection maintained ancestral sexual dimorphism. However, discordant selection altered size dimorphism in a trait-specific manner. We observe multiple, possible soft selective sweeps in the genome, with size related genes showing signs of selection. Patterns of genomic differentiation between the sexes within lineages identified potential sites maintained by sexual conflict. One discordant selection lineage shows a pattern of elevated genomic differentiation on chromosome 3L, consistent with the maintenance of sexual conflict. Our results suggest measurable signs of conflict and differentially segregating alleles between the sexes due to discordant selection.

evolutionary biology↗