Biology subjects

Attig, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Attig, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Tissue-specific and interferon-inducible expression of non-functional ACE2 through endogenous retrovirus co-option

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is an entry receptor for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as well as a regulator of several physiological processes. ACE2 has recently been proposed to be interferon-inducible, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 may exploit this phenomenon to enhance viral spread and questioning the efficacy of interferon treatment in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Using a recent de novo transcript assembly that captured previously unannotated transcripts, we describe a novel isoform of ACE2, generated by co-option of an intronic long terminal repeat (LTR) retroelement promoter. The novel transcript, termed LTR16A1-ACE2, exhibits specific expression patterns across the aerodigestive and gastrointestinal tracts and, importantly, is highly responsive to interferon stimulation. In stark contrast, expression of canonical ACE2 is completely unresponsive to interferon stimulation. Moreover, the LTR16A1-ACE2 translation product is a truncated, unstable ACE2 form, lacking domains required for SARS-CoV-2 binding and therefore unlikely to contribute to or enhance viral infection.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Intergenic RNA mainly derives from nascent transcripts of known genes

BackgroundEukaryotic genomes undergo pervasive transcription, leading to the production of many types of stable and unstable RNAs. Transcription is not restricted to regions with annotated gene features but includes almost any genomic context. Currently, the source and function of most RNAs originating from intergenic regions in the human genome remains unclear. ResultsWe hypothesised that many intergenic RNA can be ascribed to the presence of as-yet unannotated genes or the fuzzy transcription of known genes that extends beyond the annotated boundaries. To elucidate the contributions of these two sources, we assembled a dataset of >2.5 billion publicly available RNA-seq reads across 5 human cell lines and multiple cellular compartments to annotate transcriptional units in the human genome. About 80% of transcripts from unannotated intergenic regions can be attributed to the fuzzy transcription of existing genes; the remaining transcripts originate mainly from putative long non-coding RNA loci that are rarely spliced. We validated the transcriptional activity of these intergenic RNA using independent measurements, including transcriptional start sites, chromatin signatures, and genomic occupancies of RNA polymerase II in various phosphorylation states. We also analysed the nuclear localisation and sensitivities of intergenic transcripts to nucleases to illustrate that they tend to be rapidly degraded either on-chromatin by XRN2 or off-chromatin by the exosome. ConclusionsWe provide a curated atlas of intergenic RNAs that distinguishes between alternative processing of well annotated genes from independent transcriptional units based on the combined analysis of chromatin signatures, nuclear RNA localisation and degradation pathways.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Heteromeric RNP assembly at LINEs controls lineage-specific RNA processing

It is challenging for RNA processing machineries to select exons within long intronic regions. We find that intronic LINE repeat sequences (LINEs) contribute to this selection by recruiting dozens of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). This includes MATR3, which promotes binding of PTBP1 to multivalent binding sites in LINEs. Both RBPs repress splicing and 3 end processing within and around LINEs, as demonstrated in cultured human cells and mouse brain. Notably, repressive RBPs preferentially bind to evolutionarily young LINEs, which are confined to deep intronic regions. These RBPs insulate both LINEs and surrounding regions from RNA processing. Upon evolutionary divergence, gradual loss of insulation diversifies the roles of LINEs. Older LINEs are located closer to exons, are a common source of tissue-specific exons, and increasingly bind to RBPs that enhance RNA processing. Thus, LINEs are hubs for assembly of repressive RBPs, and contribute to evolution of new, lineage-specific transcripts in mammals.

genomics↗