bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Atkinson, E. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Atkinson, E. G..

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

MosaicSim: A Novel Mosaic Variant Simulator Reveals Diminishing Returns of Ultra-High Coverage for Mosaic Variant Detection

Genetic mutations within select cells of a tissue, termed mosaic variants (MV), are being increasingly recognized for their role in human disease. This growing interest underscores the need for specialized tools to detect and analyze MVs. However, such detection methods still lack thorough evaluation, largely due to missing benchmarking datasets that are large, reliable, and reflective of the complexity of biological samples. To address this gap, we developed MosaicSim, a tool for simulating variants in realistic sequencing data. The TweakVar workflow is at the tools core and represents a unique simulation pipeline that layers simulated MVs onto empirical whole genome sequencing data, generating a large, realistic ground truth dataset that combines the strengths of both simulation and biological data. To demonstrate the functionality of the workflow, we simulated 1,000 mosaic single nucleotide polymorphisms using TweakVar within whole genome sequencing files of different coverages. MVs were called with Illuminas DRAGEN and compared to the ground truth. Our results show 150x-445x coverage performed comparably, with a true-positive rate between 50.4% (300x) and 54.9% (150x) and no false-positives detected. Across all samples, increasing variant allele frequency had a significant positive effect on call success. Additionally, we observed that call rates for variants in lower complexity regions improved with increasing read depth. We did not find significant effects attributable to specific mutation patterns or mean read map quality. MosaicSim fills a critical unmet need by providing representative, customizable ground truth datasets for MV benchmarking, enabling systematic evaluation and optimization of variant calling methods.

genomics↗

Tractor Workflow Pipeline: A Scalable Nextflow Framework for Local Ancestry-Aware Genome-Wide Association Studies

The routine exclusion of admixed individuals from traditional Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) due to concerns about spurious associations has hindered genetic analyses involving multiple ancestries. Tractor GWAS addresses this issue by incorporating local ancestry into its analysis, empowering identification of ancestry-enriched hits and generating ancestry-specific summary statistics. However, Tractor requires accurate genomic phasing and local ancestry inference as prerequisite steps, which requires additional bioinformatics expertise and decision points regarding reference panel setup. To streamline, harmonize, and automate this process, we present a scalable Nextflow workflow that integrates all necessary steps, minimizing the need for manual intervention while remaining modular and customizable. The workflow supports multiple commonly used tools and offers flexibility in how Tractor is implemented. To demonstrate its utility, we applied this pipeline to analyze 32 blood biomarkers in 6,245 two-way AFR-EUR admixed individuals from the UK Biobank. This pipeline ran efficiently at scale, replicated known associations, and identified novel ancestry-specific loci. These novel associations were largely driven by variants present on African ancestral tracts but absent from European tracts, underscoring the value of local ancestry-aware methods in uncovering previously missed genetic signals. By enabling the efficient analysis of admixed individuals, our workflow facilitates Tractor use, paving the way for more broader genetic discovery.

genomics↗

Differential performance of polygenic prediction across traits and populations depending on genotype discovery approach

Polygenic scores (PGS) are widely used to estimate genetic predisposition to complex traits by aggregating the effects of common variants into a single measure. They hold promise in identifying individuals at increased risk for diseases, allowing earlier screening and interventions. Genotyping arrays, commonly used for PGS computation, are affordable and computationally efficient, while whole-genome sequencing (WGS) offers a more comprehensive view of genetic variation. In this study, we compared PGS derived from arrays and WGS across multiple traits to evaluate differences in predictive performance, portability across populations, and computational efficiency. We computed PGS for 10 traits, representing a range of heritability and polygenicity, in the three largest genetic ancestry groups in All of Us (European, African American, Admixed American), trained on multi-ancestry meta-analyses from the Pan-UK Biobank. Using the clumping and thresholding (C+T) method, we found that WGS-based PGS outperformed array-based PRS for highly polygenic traits but showed differentially reduced accuracy for sparse traits in certain populations. With the LD-informed PRS-CS method, we observed overall improved prediction performance compared to C+T, with WGS outperforming arrays across most non-cancer traits. The results obtained using PRS-CS closely align with those derived from pre-trained models in the PGS Catalog, with prediction achieving better performance using WGS than array genotypes for non-sparse traits. To further investigate factors influencing differential prediction performance between array and WGS, we ran simulations varying the proportions of causal SNPs directly captured by the technologies. These demonstrated that the proportion of causal variants genotyped dramatically affects prediction accuracy. Fine-mapping of empirical data supported this concept but also highlighted the importance of reducing non-informative variants for optimal prediction accuracy. In conclusion, while WGS-based PGS generally offer superior predictive power with PRS-CS, the advantage over arrays is context-dependent, varying by trait, population, and the PGS method. The ability to capture causal variants through these technologies largely drives the prediction accuracy. This study provides insights into the complexities and potential advantages of using different genotype discovery approaches for polygenic predictions across populations and informs on strategies to enhance accuracy.

genetics↗

Improved Allele Frequencies in gnomAD through Local Ancestry Inference

The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) is a foundational resource for allele frequency data, widely used in genomic research and clinical interpretation. However, traditional estimates rely on individual-level genetic ancestry groupings that may obscure variation in recently admixed populations. To improve resolution, we applied local ancestry inference (LAI) to over 27 million variants in two admixed groups: Admixed American (n = 7,612) and African/African American (n = 20,250), deriving ancestry-specific allele frequencies. We show that 78.5% and 85.1% of variants in these groups, respectively, exhibit at least a twofold difference in ancestry-specific frequencies. Moreover, 81.49% of variants with LAI information would be assigned a higher gnomAD-wide maximum frequency after incorporating LAI, potentially altering clinical interpretations. This LAI-informed release reveals clinically relevant frequency differences that are masked in aggregate estimates and may support reclassifying some variants from Uncertain Significance to Benign or Likely Benign.

genomics↗

A blended genome and exome sequencing method captures genetic variation in an unbiased, high-quality, and cost-effective manner

We deployed the Blended Genome Exome (BGE), a DNA library blending approach that generates low pass whole genome (1-4x mean depth) and deep whole exome (30-40x mean depth) data in a single sequencing run. This technology is cost-effective, empowers most genomic discoveries possible with deep whole genome sequencing, and provides an unbiased method to capture the diversity of common SNP variation across the globe. To evaluate this new technology at scale, we applied BGE to sequence >53,000 samples from the Populations Underrepresented in Mental Illness Associations Studies (PUMAS) Project, which included participants across African, African American, and Latin American populations. We evaluated the accuracy of BGE imputed genotypes against raw genotype calls from the Illumina Global Screening Array. All PUMAS cohorts had R2 concordance [&ge;]95% among SNPs with MAF[&ge;]1%, and never fell below [&ge;]90% R2 for SNPs with MAF<1%. Furthermore, concordance rates among local ancestries within two recently admixed cohorts were consistent among SNPs with MAF[&ge;]1%, with only minor deviations in SNPs with MAF<1%. We also benchmarked the discovery capacity of BGE to access protein-coding copy number variants (CNVs) against deep whole genome data, finding that deletions and duplications spanning at least 3 exons had a positive predicted value of [~]90%. Our results demonstrate BGE scalability and efficacy in capturing SNPs, indels, and CNVs in the human genome at 28% of the cost of deep whole-genome sequencing. BGE is poised to enhance access to genomic testing and empower genomic discoveries, particularly in underrepresented populations.

genomics↗

Characterizing features affecting local ancestry inference performance in admixed populations

In recent years, significant efforts have been made to improve methods for genomic studies of admixed populations using Local Ancestry Inference (LAI). Accurate LAI is crucial to ensure downstream analyses reflect the genetic ancestry of research participants accurately. Here, we test analytic strategies for LAI to provide guidelines for optimal accuracy, focusing on admixed populations reflective of Latin Americas primary continental ancestries - African (AFR), Amerindigenous (AMR), and European (EUR). Simulating LD-informed admixed haplotypes under a variety of 2 and 3-way admixture models, we implemented a standard LAI pipeline, testing three reference panel compositions to quantify their overall and ancestry-specific accuracy. We examined LAI miscall frequencies and true positive rates (TPR) across simulation models and continental ancestries. AMR tracts have notably reduced LAI accuracy as compared to EUR and AFR tracts in all comparisons, with TPR means for AMR ranging from 88-94%, EUR from 96-99% and AFR 98-99%. When LAI miscalls occurred, they most frequently erroneously called European ancestry in true Amerindigenous sites. Using a reference panel well-matched to the target population, even with a lower sample size, LAI produced true-positive estimates that were not statistically different from a high sample size but mismatched reference, while being more computationally efficient. While directly responsive to admixed Latin American cohort compositions, these trends are broadly useful for informing best practices for LAI across other admixed populations. Our findings reinforce the need for inclusion of more underrepresented populations in sequencing efforts to improve reference panels.

genomics↗

Admix-kit: An Integrated Toolkit and Pipeline for Genetic Analyses of Admixed Populations

SummaryAdmixed populations, with their unique and diverse genetic backgrounds, are often underrepresented in genetic studies. This oversight not only limits our understanding but also exacerbates existing health disparities. One major barrier has been the lack of efficient tools tailored for the special challenges of genetic study of admixed populations. Here, we present admix-kit, an integrated toolkit and pipeline for genetic analyses of admixed populations. Admix-kit implements a suite of methods to facilitate genotype and phenotype simulation, association testing, genetic architecture inference, and polygenic scoring in admixed populations. Availability and implementationAdmix-kit package is open-source and available at https://github.com/KangchengHou/admix-kit. Additionally, users can use the pipeline designed for admixed genotype simulation available at https://github.com/UW-GAC/admix-kit_workflow.

genetics↗

A harmonized public resource of deeply sequenced diverse human genomes

Underrepresented populations are often excluded from genomic studies due in part to a lack of resources supporting their analyses. The 1000 Genomes Project (1kGP) and Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP), which have recently been sequenced to high coverage, are valuable genomic resources because of the global diversity they capture and their open data sharing policies. Here, we harmonized a high quality set of 4,094 whole genomes from HGDP and 1kGP with data from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and identified over 153 million high-quality SNVs, indels, and SVs. We performed a detailed ancestry analysis of this cohort, characterizing population structure and patterns of admixture across populations, analyzing site frequency spectra, and measuring variant counts at global and subcontinental levels. We also demonstrate substantial added value from this dataset compared to the prior versions of the component resources, typically combined via liftover and variant intersection; for example, we catalog millions of new genetic variants, mostly rare, compared to previous releases. In addition to unrestricted individual-level public release, we provide detailed tutorials for conducting many of the most common quality control steps and analyses with these data in a scalable cloud-computing environment and publicly release this new phased joint callset for use as a haplotype resource in phasing and imputation pipelines. This jointly called reference panel will serve as a key resource to support research of diverse ancestry populations.

genomics↗

Polygenic prediction across populations is influenced by ancestry, genetic architecture, and methodology

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) developed from multi-ancestry genome-wide association studies (GWAS), PRSmulti, hold promise for improving PRS accuracy and generalizability across populations. To establish best practices for leveraging the increasing diversity of genomic studies, we investigated how various factors affect the performance of PRSmulti compared to PRS constructed from single-ancestry GWAS (PRSsingle). Through extensive simulations and empirical analyses, we showed that PRSmulti overall outperformed PRSsingle in understudied populations, except when the understudied population represented a small proportion of the multi-ancestry GWAS. Notably, for traits with large-effect ancestry-enriched variants, such as mean corpuscular volume, using substantially fewer samples from Biobank Japan achieved comparable accuracies to a much larger European cohort. Furthermore, integrating PRS based on local ancestry-informed GWAS and large-scale European-based PRS improved predictive performance in understudied African populations, especially for less polygenic traits with large ancestry-enriched variants. Our work highlights the importance of diversifying genomic studies to achieve equitable PRS performance across ancestral populations and provides guidance for developing PRS from multiple studies.

genomics↗

Discordant genotype calls across technology platforms elucidate variants with systematic errors in next-generation sequencing

Large-scale next-generation sequencing datasets have been transformative for informing clinical variant interpretation and as reference panels for statistical and population genetic efforts. While such resources are often treated as ground truth, we find that in widely used reference datasets such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), some variants pass gold standard filters yet are systematically different in their genotype calls across genotype discovery approaches. The inclusion of such discordant sites in study designs involving multiple genotype discovery strategies could bias results and lead to false-positive hits in association studies due to technological artifacts rather than a true relationship to the phenotype. Here, we describe this phenomenon of discordant genotype calls across genotype discovery approaches, characterize the error mode of wrong calls, provide a blacklist of discordant sites identified in gnomAD that should be treated with caution in analyses, and present a metric and machine learning classifier trained on gnomAD data to identify likely discordant variants in other datasets. We find that different genotype discovery approaches have different sets of variants at which this problem occurs but that there are characteristic variant features that can be used to predict discordant behavior. Discordant sites are largely shared across ancestry groups, though different populations are powered for discovery of different variants. We find that the most common error mode is that of a variant being heterozygous for one approach and homozygous for the other, with heterozygous in the genomes and homozygous reference in the exomes making up the majority of miscalls.

genomics↗

A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa

While it is now broadly accepted that Homo sapiens originated within Africa, considerable uncertainty surrounds specific models of divergence and migration across the continent. Progress is hampered by a paucity of fossil and genomic data, as well as variability in prior divergence time estimates. Here we use linkage disequilibrium and diversity-based statistics, optimized for rapid, complex demographic inference to discriminate among such models. We infer detailed demographic models for populations across Africa, including representatives from eastern and western groups, as well as 44 newly whole-genome sequenced individuals from the Nama (Khoe-San). Despite the complexity of African population history, contemporary population structure dates back to Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5. The earliest population divergence among contemporary populations occurs 120-135ka, between the Khoe-San and other groups. Prior to the divergence of contemporary African groups, we infer long-lasting structure between two or more weakly differentiated ancestral Homo populations connected by gene flow over hundreds of thousands of years (i.e. a weakly structured stem). We find that weakly structured stem models provide more likely explanations of polymorphism that had previously been attributed to contributions from archaic hominins in Africa. In contrast to models with archaic introgression, we predict that fossil remains from coexisting ancestral populations should be morphologically similar. Despite genetic similarity between these populations, an inferred 1-4% of genetic differentiation among contemporary human populations can be attributed to genetic drift between stem populations. We show that model misspecification explains variation in previous divergence time estimates and argue that studying a suite of models is key to robust inferences about deep history.

genomics↗

Genetic structure correlates with ethnolinguistic diversity in eastern and southern Africa

African populations are the most diverse in the world yet are sorely underrepresented in medical genetics research. Here, we examine the structure of African populations using genetic and comprehensive multigenerational ethnolinguistic data from the Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Populations-Psychosis study (NeuroGAP-Psychosis) consisting of 900 individuals from Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. We find that self-reported language classifications meaningfully tag underlying genetic variation that would be missed with consideration of geography alone, highlighting the importance of culture in shaping genetic diversity. Leveraging our uniquely rich multi-generational ethnolinguistic metadata, we track language transmission through the pedigree, observing the disappearance of several languages in our cohort as well as notable shifts in frequency over three generations. We find suggestive evidence for the rate of language transmission in matrilineal groups having been higher than that for patrilineal ones. We highlight both the diversity of variation within the African continent, as well as how within-Africa variation can be informative for broader variant interpretation; many variants appearing rare elsewhere are common in parts of Africa. The work presented here improves the understanding of the spectrum of genetic variation in African populations and highlights the enormous and complex genetic and ethnolinguistic diversity within Africa.

genomics↗

Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis yields novel genetic discoveries and ancestry-specific associations

We present a new method, Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis (MAMA), which combines genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from multiple populations to produce new summary statistics for each population, identifying novel loci that would not have been discovered in either set of GWAS summary statistics alone. In simulations, MAMA increases power with less bias and generally lower type-1 error rate than other multi-ancestry meta-analysis approaches. We apply MAMA to 23 phenotypes in East-Asian- and European-ancestry populations and find substantial gains in power. In an independent sample, novel genetic discoveries from MAMA replicate strongly.

genomics↗

Low generalizability of polygenic scores in African populations due to genetic and environmental diversity

African populations are vastly underrepresented in genetic studies but have the most genetic variation and face wide-ranging environmental exposures globally. Because systematic evaluations of genetic prediction had not yet been conducted in ancestries that span African diversity, we calculated polygenic risk scores (PRS) in simulations across Africa and in empirical data from South Africa, Uganda, and the UK to better understand the generalizability of genetic studies. PRS accuracy improves with ancestry-matched discovery cohorts more than from ancestry-mismatched studies. Within ancestrally and ethnically diverse South Africans, we find that PRS accuracy is low for all traits but varies across groups. Differences in African ancestries contribute more to variability in PRS accuracy than other large cohort differences considered between individuals in the UK versus Uganda. We computed PRS in African ancestry populations using existing European-only versus ancestrally diverse genetic studies; the increased diversity produced the largest accuracy gains for hemoglobin concentration and white blood cell count, reflecting large-effect ancestry-enriched variants in genes known to influence sickle cell anemia and the allergic response, respectively. Differences in PRS accuracy across African ancestries originating from diverse regions are as large as across out-of-Africa continental ancestries, requiring commensurate nuance.

genetics↗

Genome Wide Association Study in the New Haven Lexinome Project Identifies GARRE1 as a Novel Gene for Reading Performance

Despite high prevalence and high heritability, few candidate genes have been identified for reading disability. To identify novel genetic variants we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using high-depth whole genome sequencing and predicated on reading performance in 407 subjects enrolled in a longitudinal study of response-to-intervention, called the New Haven Lexinome Project. The primary GWAS identified a single peak of 31 SNPs on chromosome 19 that achieved the threshold for genome-wide significance (rs2599553 P=3.13x10-8) located over an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) for GARRE1 (Granule Associated Rac And RHOG Effector 1). Little is known about the function of GARRE1, except that it is highly and developmentally expressed in human cerebellum relative to cortex. Local ancestry regression showed the strongest association for the lead variant in African or Admixed American populations, who have been under-represented in previous genetic studies of reading. We replicated our chromosome 19 results in the Genes, Reading, and Dyslexia (GRaD) cohort and found a moderating effect of age with implications for the consideration of developmental effects in the design of future analyses. Growth curve modeling demonstrated that minor alleles of the lead SNP are related to reading longitudinally from Grade 1 to Grade 5, and that children with at least 1 minor allele of rs2599553 persistently underperformed relative to their peers by 0.33 to 0.5 standard deviations on standardized assessments of non-word decoding and reading fluency. Significance StatementTo the best of our knowledge, this work represents the only GWAS predicated on longitudinal reading performance data. Starting with initial discovery, we replicate our association in a second cohort, address common causes of type I error, localize the signal to a single gene, implicate a region of the brain most likely to be affected by variation in our candidate, show a gene-by-age effect with implications for study design in this field, and demonstrate that minor alleles of our lead SNP are associated with significant and persistent clinical effects on reading development in children.

genetics↗

Tractor: A framework allowing for improved inclusion of admixed individuals in large-scale association studies.

Admixed populations are routinely excluded from medical genomic studies due to concerns over population structure. Here, we present a statistical framework and software package, Tractor, to facilitate the inclusion of admixed individuals in association studies by leveraging local ancestry. We test Tractor with simulations and empirical data focused on admixed African-European individuals. Tractor generates ancestryspecific effect size estimates, can boost GWAS power, and improves the resolution of association signals. Using a local ancestry aware regression model, we replicate known hits for blood lipids in admixed populations, discover novel hits missed by standard GWAS procedures, and localize signals closer to putative causal variants.

genomics↗

Low-coverage sequencing cost-effectively detects known and novel variation in underrepresented populations

BackgroundGenetic studies of biomedical phenotypes in underrepresented populations identify disproportionate numbers of novel associations. However, current genomics infrastructure--including most genotyping arrays and sequenced reference panels--best serves populations of European descent. A critical step for facilitating genetic studies in underrepresented populations is to ensure that genetic technologies accurately capture variation in all populations. Here, we quantify the accuracy of low-coverage sequencing in diverse African populations. ResultsWe sequenced the whole genomes of 91 individuals to high-coverage ([&ge;]20X) from the Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Population-Psychosis (NeuroGAP-Psychosis) study, in which participants were recruited from Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. We empirically tested two data generation strategies, GWAS arrays versus low-coverage sequencing, by calculating the concordance of imputed variants from these technologies with those from deep whole genome sequencing data. We show that low-coverage sequencing at a depth of [&ge;]4X captures variants of all frequencies more accurately than all commonly used GWAS arrays investigated and at a comparable cost. Lower depths of sequencing (0.5-1X) performed comparable to commonly used low-density GWAS arrays. Low-coverage sequencing is also sensitive to novel variation, with 4X sequencing detecting 45% of singletons and 95% of common variants identified in high-coverage African whole genomes. ConclusionThese results indicate that low-coverage sequencing approaches surmount the problems induced by the ascertainment of common genotyping arrays, including those that capture variation most common in Europeans and Africans. Low-coverage sequencing effectively identifies novel variation (particularly in underrepresented populations), and presents opportunities to enhance variant discovery at a similar cost to traditional approaches.

genomics↗

Natural selection influenced the genetic architecture of brain structure, behavioral and neuropsychiatric traits

Natural selection has shaped the phenotypic characteristics of human populations. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have elucidated contributions of thousands of common variants with small effects on an individuals predisposition to complex traits (polygenicity), as well as wide-spread sharing of risk alleles across traits in the human phenome (pleiotropy). It remains unclear how the pervasive effects of natural selection influence polygenicity in brain-related traits. We investigate these effects by annotating the genome with measures of background (BGS) and positive selection, indications of Neanderthal introgression, measures of functional significance including loss-of-function (LoF) intolerant and genic regions, and genotype networks in 75 brain-related traits. Evidence of natural selection was determined using binary annotations of top 2%, 1%, and 0.5% of selection scores genome-wide. We detected enrichment (q<0.05) of SNP-heritability at loci with elevated BGS (7 phenotypes) and in genic (34 phenotypes) and LoF-intolerant regions (67 phenotypes). BGS (top 2%) significantly predicted effect size variance for trait-associated loci ({sigma}2 parameter) in 75 brain-related traits ({beta}=4.39x10-5, p=1.43x10-5, model r2=0.548). By including the number of DSM-5 diagnostic combinations per psychiatric disorder, we substantially improved model fit ({sigma}2 ~ BTop2% x Genic x diagnostic combinations; model r2=0.661). We show that GWAS with larger variance in risk locus effect sizes are collectively predicted by the effects of loci under strong BGS and in regulatory regions of the genome. We further show that diagnostic complexity exacerbates this relationship and perhaps dampens the ability to detect psychiatric risk loci.

evolutionary biology↗