bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Arnell, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Arnell, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The global exposure of species ranges and protected areas to forest management

The majority of vertebrate species globally are dependent on forests, most of which require active protection to safeguard global biodiversity. Forests, however, are increasingly either being disturbed, planted or managed in the form of timber or food plantations. Because of a lack of spatial data, forest management has commonly been ignored in previous conservation assessments. Here we show - using a new global map of forest management - that disturbed and human managed forests cover the distributional ranges of most forest-associated species. Even more worrying, protected areas are increasingly being established in areas dominated by disturbed forests. Our results imply that species extinction risk and habitat assessments might have been overly optimistic with forest management practices being ignored. With forest restoration being in the centre of climate and conservation policies in this decade, we caution that policy makers should explicitly consider forest management.

ecology↗

Areas of global importance for terrestrial biodiversity, carbon, and water

Summary paragraphTo meet the ambitious objectives of biodiversity and climate conventions, countries and the international community require clarity on how these objectives can be operationalized spatially, and multiple targets be pursued concurrently1. To support governments and political conventions, spatial guidance is needed to identify which areas should be managed for conservation to generate the greatest synergies between biodiversity and natures contribution to people (NCP). Here we present results from a joint optimization that maximizes improvements in species conservation status, carbon retention and water provisioning and rank terrestrial conservation priorities globally. We found that, selecting the top-ranked 30% (respectively 50%) of areas would conserve 62.4% (86.8%) of the estimated total carbon stock and 67.8% (90.7%) of all clean water provisioning, in addition to improving the conservation status for 69.7% (83.8%) of all species considered. If priority was given to biodiversity only, managing 30% of optimally located land area for conservation may be sufficient to improve the conservation status of 86.3% of plant and vertebrate species on Earth. Our results provide a global baseline on where land could be managed for conservation. We discuss how such a spatial prioritisation framework can support the implementation of the biodiversity and climate conventions.

ecology↗