bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Arias, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Arias, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Transparency reduces predator detection in chemically protected clearwing butterflies

1. Predation is an important selective pressure and some prey have evolved warning colour signals advertising unpalatability (i.e. aposematism) as an antipredator strategy. Unexpectedly, some butterfly species from the unpalatable tribe Ithomiini possess transparent wings, an adaptation rare on land but common in water where it helps avoiding predator detection.\n\n2. We tested if transparency of butterfly wings was associated with decreased detectability by predators, by comparing four butterfly species exhibiting different degrees of transparency, ranging from fully opaque to largely transparent. We tested our prediction using using both wild birds and humans in behavioural experiments. Vision modelling predicted detectability to be similar for these two predator types.\n\n3. In concordance with predictions, more transparent species were almost never the first detected items and were detected less often than the opaque species by both birds and humans, suggesting that transparency enhances crypsis. However, humans could learn to better detect the most transparent species over time. Our study demonstrates for the first time that transparency on land likely decreases detectability by visual predators.

evolutionary biology

Generalisation behaviour of predators toward warning signals displayed by harmful prey: answers from a video-game played by humans.

The persistence of several warning signals in sympatry is a puzzling evolutionary question because selection favours convergence of colour patterns among toxic species. Such convergence is shaped by predators reaction to similar but not identical stimulus, i.e. generalisation behaviour. However, studying generalisation behaviour in complex natural communities of predators is challenging, and is thus generally limited to simple variations of prey colour patterns. Here, we used humans as surrogate predators to investigate generalisation behaviours on two prey communities with different level of warning signals complexity. Humans generalisation capacities were estimated using a computer game simulating a simple (4 morphs) and a complex (10 morphs) community of defended (associated with a penalty) and palatable butterflies. Colour patterns used in the game are actually observed in natural populations of the defended butterflies H. numata, and generalisation behaviour of natural predators communities on these colour patterns have previously been investigated in the wild, allowing direct comparison with human behaviour. We investigated human predation behaviour by recording attack rates on the different defended and palatable colour patterns, as well as player survival time (i.e. score). Phenotypic similarity among the different colour patterns was precisely quantified using a custom algorithm accounting for both colour and pattern variations (CPM method). By analysing attack behaviours of 491 game players, we found that learning was more efficient in the simple prey community. Additionally, profitable prey gained protection from sharing key visual features with unprofitable prey in both communities while learning, in accordance with natural predator behaviours. Moreover, other behaviours observed in natural predators, such as colour neophobia, were detected in humans and shaped morph vulnerability during the game. Similarities between our results in humans and the reaction of natural predator communities to the same colour patterns validate our video-game as a useful proxy to study predator behaviour. This experimental set-up can thus be compared to natural systems, enabling further investigations of generalisation on mimicry evolution.

evolutionary biology