Archie, E. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2018

Vertical transmission of sponge microbiota is weak and inconsistent

Classic coevolutionary theory predicts that if beneficial microbial symbionts improve host fitness, they should be faithfully transmitted to offspring. More recently, the hologenome theory of evolution predicts resemblance between parent and offspring microbiomes and high partner fidelity between host species and their vertically transmitted microbes. Here, we test these ideas for the first time in multiple coexisting host species with highly diverse microbiota, leveraging known parent-offspring pairs sampled from eight species of wild marine sponges (Porifera). We found that the processes governing vertical transmission were both neutral and selective. A neutral model explained 66% of the variance in larval microbiota, which was higher than the variance this model explained for adult sponge microbiota (R2 = 27%). However, microbes that are enriched above neutral expectations in adults were disproportionately transferred to offspring. Patterns of vertical transmission were, however, incomplete: larval sponges shared, on average, 44.8% of microbes with their parents, which was not higher than the fraction they shared with nearby non-parental adults. Vertical transmission was also inconsistent across siblings, as larval sponges from the same parent only shared 17% of microbes. Finally, we found no evidence that vertically transmitted microbes are faithful to a single sponge host species. Surprisingly, larvae were just as likely to share vertically transmitted microbes with larvae from other sponge species as they were with their own species. Our study demonstrates that common predictions of vertical transmission that stem from species-poor systems are not necessarily true when scaling up to diverse and complex microbiomes.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Dominance rank-associated immune gene expression is widespread, sex-specific, and a precursor to high social status in wild male baboons

In humans and other hierarchical species, social status is tightly linked to variation in health and fitness-related traits. Experimental manipulations of social status in female rhesus macaques suggest that this relationship is partially explained by status effects on immune gene regulation. However, social hierarchies are established and maintained in different ways across species: while some are based on kin-directed nepotism, others emerge from direct physical competition. We investigated how this variation influences the relationship between social status and immune gene regulation in wild baboons, where hierarchies in males are based on fighting ability but female hierarchies are nepotistic. We measured rank-related variation in gene expression levels in adult baboons of both sexes at baseline and in response to ex vivo stimulation with the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We identified >2000 rank- associated genes in males, an order of magnitude more than in females. In males, high status predicted increased expression of genes involved in innate immunity and preferential activation of the NFkB-mediated pro-inflammatory pathway, a pattern previously associated with low status in female rhesus macaques. Using Mendelian randomization, we reconcile these observations by demonstrating that high status-associated gene expression patterns are precursors, not consequences, of high social status in males, in support of the idea that physiological condition determines who attains high rank. Together, our work provides the first test of the relationship between social status and immune gene regulation in wild primates. It also emphasizes the importance of social context in shaping the relationship between social status and immune function.\n\nSIGNIFICANCESocial status predicts fitness outcomes in social animals, motivating efforts to understand its physiological causes and consequences. We investigated the relationship between social status and immune gene expression in wild baboons, where female status is determined by kinship but male status is determined by fighting ability. We uncover pervasive status-gene expression associations in males, but not females. High status males exhibit high levels of pro-inflammatory gene expression, in contrast to previous findings in hierarchies that are not competitively determined. Using Mendelian randomization, we show that this status-associated variation precedes dominance rank attainment: males who compete successfully for high status are already immunologically distinct. The nature of social hierarchies thus fundamentally shapes the relationship between social status and immune function.

evolutionary biology↗