bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Arcady Mushegian

Publications and source records attributed to Arcady Mushegian.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Phylogenetic tree inference from local gene content

BackgroundComplete genome sequences provide many new characters suitable for studying phylogenetic relationships. The limitations of the single sequence-based phylogenetic reconstruction prompted the efforts to build trees based on genome-wide properties, such as the fraction of shared orthologous genes or conservation of adjoining gene pairs. Gene content-based phylogenies, however, have their own biases: most notably, differential losses and horizontal transfers of genes interfere with phylogenetic signal, each in their own way, and special measures need to be taken to eliminate these types of noise.\n\nResultsWe expand the repertoire of genome-wide traits available for phylogeny building, by developing a practical approach for measuring local gene conservation in two genomes. We counted the number of orthologous genes shared by chromosomal neighborhoods (\"bins\"), and built the phylogeny of 63 prokaryotic genomes on this basis. The tree correctly resolved all well-established clades, and also suggested the monophily of firmicutes, which tend to be split in other genome-based trees.\n\nConclusionsOur measure of local gene order conservation extracts strong phylogenetic signal. This new measure appears to be substantially resistant to the observed instances of gene loss and horizontal transfer, two evolutionary forces which can cause systematic biases in the genome-based phylogenies.

Bioinformatics

Reconstructing gene content in the last common ancestor of cellular life: is it possible, should it be done, and are we making any progress?

I review recent literature on the reconstruction of gene repertoire of the Last Universal Common Ancestor of cellular life (LUCA). The form of the phylogenetic record of cellular life on Earth is important to know in order to reconstruct any ancestral state; therefore I also discuss the emerging understanding that this record does not take the form of a tree. I argue that despite this, \"tree-thinking\" remains an essential component in evolutionary thinking and that \"pattern pluralism\" in evolutionary biology can be only epistemological, but not ontological.

Evolutionary Biology