Arbo, B. D. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2026

Modulation of social behavior in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Social behavior is a fundamental phenotype across vertebrates. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have emerged as a valuable translational model for investigating the neurobiological mechanisms underlying sociability, particularly due to their robust shoaling behavior and experimental tractability. However, the literature presents issues of reproducibility and inconsistent findings regarding the modulation of social preference and shoal cohesion in adult zebrafish. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize studies evaluating the effects of pharmacological interventions that modulate the central nervous system and stress-related interventions on social behavior in adult zebrafish and, when available, anxiety-like behavior. The literature search was performed in three databases (Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science), followed by a two-step screening process based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The included studies underwent extraction of qualitative and quantitative data, as well as risk of bias assessment. Interventions from the included studies (n = 108) were categorized according to their nature, mechanism of action, and/or therapeutic purpose, resulting in seven, four, and five meta-analyses for social preference, shoal cohesion, and anxiety-related tests, respectively. Ethanol, NMDA antagonists, pro-dopaminergic agents, and stress-related interventions decreased social preference, while stress-related interventions increased shoal cohesion. The fact that stress produced opposite effects suggests that these paradigms measure distinct sociability constructs, or perhaps are differentially modulated by confounding factors, like anxiety for example. The studies presented high heterogeneity, with prediction intervals compatible with effects in both directions, as well as methodological limitations and deficiencies in data reporting, as evidenced by the risk of bias assessment. These findings emphasize the need for well-designed new studies to validate the findings and expand the evidence on interventions that currently lack sufficient studies for quantitative synthesis.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Effects of NMDA antagonists on social behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

Social withdrawal is a key component of the negative symptom domain of schizophrenia, and pharmacological blockade of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is widely used to model schizophrenia-relevant phenotypes in animals. However, findings on social behaviour are inconsistent across paradigms and laboratories. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the effects of dizocilpine, ketamine, and phencyclidine on social interaction and social preference, to evaluate whether clinically approved antipsychotics modify these outcomes, and to examine locomotor activity measured within the same social tests to aid interpretation. We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of Science without language or date restrictions. Controlled in vivo studies in laboratory animals administering an eligible NMDAR antagonist and reporting social interaction and/or social preference outcomes were included. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Effect sizes were computed as standardised mean differences and synthesised using correlated multilevel random-effects models with cluster-robust variance estimation. In total, 264 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, NMDAR antagonists were associated with reduced social interaction and reduced social preference relative to controls, although the social preference literature appeared vulnerable to small-study effects and imprecision. Locomotor activity measured during social interaction tests tended to be higher following NMDAR antagonists, whereas during social preference no consistent overall change was observed. In animals exposed to NMDAR antagonists, antipsychotics increased social behaviour, but these changes commonly co-occurred with reduced locomotion during social interaction tests, suggesting that improvements in social measures may partly reflect altered behavioural competition and time allocation rather than selective restoration of social functioning. Taken together, the evidence supports an overall link between NMDAR antagonism and reduced social behaviour, but the strength and interpretability of this signal depend on the paradigm and are constrained by heterogeneity and limitations in reporting.

pharmacology and toxicology↗