bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Arbeitman, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Arbeitman, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Contribution of neurons that express fruitless and Clock transcription factors to behavioral rhythms and courtship

Animals need to integrate information across neuronal networks that direct reproductive behaviors and circadian rhythms. In Drosophila, the master regulatory transcription factors that direct courtship behaviors and circadian rhythms are co-expressed in a small set of neurons. In this study we investigate the role of these neurons in both males and females. We find sex-differences in the number of these fruitless and Clock -expressing neurons (fru {cap} Clk neurons) that is regulated by male-specific Fru. We assign the fru {cap} Clk neurons to the electron microscopy connectome that provides high resolution structural information. We also discover sex-differences in the number of fru-expressing neurons that are post-synaptic targets of Clk-expressing neurons, with more post-synaptic targets in males. When fru {cap} Clk neurons are activated or silenced, males have a shorter period length. Activation of fru {cap} Clk neurons also changes the rate a courtship behavior is performed. We find that activation and silencing fru {cap} Clk neurons impacts the molecular clock in the sLNv master pacemaker neurons, in a cell-nonautonomous manner. These results reveal how neurons that subserve the two processes, reproduction and circadian rhythms, can impact behavioral outcomes in a sex-specific manner.

neuroscience↗

Analysis of cell-type-specific chromatin modifications and gene expression in Drosophila neurons that direct reproductive behavior

Examining the role of chromatin modifications and gene expression in neurons is critical for understanding how the potential for behaviors are established and maintained. We investigate this question by examining Drosophila melanogaster fru P1 neurons that underlie reproductive behaviors in both sexes. We developed a method to purify cell-type-specific chromatin (Chromatag), using a tagged histone H2B variant that is expressed using the versatile Gal4/UAS gene expression system. Here, we use Chromatag to evaluate five chromatin modifications, at three life stages in both sexes. We find substantial changes in chromatin modification profiles across development and fewer differences between males and females. We generated cell-type-specific RNA-seq data sets, using translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP), and identify actively translated genes in fru P1 neurons, revealing novel stage- and sex-differences in gene expression. We compare chromatin modifications to the gene expression data and find patterns of chromatin modifications associated with gene expression. An examination of the genic features where chromatin modifications resides shows certain chromatin modifications are maintained in the same genes across development, whereas others are more dynamic, which may point to modifications important for cell fate determination in neurons. Using a computational analysis to identify super-enhancer-containing genes we discovered differences across development, and between the sexes that are cell-type-specific. A set of super-enhancer-containing genes that overlapped with those determined to be expressed with the TRAP approach were validated as expressed in fru P1 neurons. Author SummaryDifferences in male and female reproductive behaviors are pervasive in nature and important for species propagation. Studies of sex differences in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, have been ongoing since the early 1900s, with many of the critical molecular and neural circuit determinates that create sexually dimorphic behavior identified. This system is a powerful model to understand fundamental principles about the underpinnings of complex behavior at high resolution. In this study, we examine the gene expression and chromatin modification differences specifically in a set of neurons that direct male and female reproductive behaviors in Drosophila. We describe differences across development and between the sexes with the goal of understanding how the potential for behavior is created and maintained.

genomics↗

Neurogenetic and genomic approaches reveal roles for Dpr/DIP cell adhesion molecules in Drosophila reproductive behavior

Drosophila reproductive behaviors are directed by fruitless neurons (fru P1 isoforms). A reanalysis of genomic studies shows that genes encoding dpr and DIP Immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) members are expressed in fru P1 neurons. Each fru P1and dpr/DIP (fru P1 {cap} dpr/DIP) overlapping expression pattern is similar in both sexes, with dimorphism in neuronal morphology and cell number. Behavioral studies of fru P1 {cap} dpr/DIP perturbation genotypes point to the mushroom body functioning together with the lateral protocerebral complex. Functionally, we find that perturbations of sex hierarchy genes and DIP-{varepsilon} changes sex-specific morphology of fru P1 {cap} DIP- neurons. A single-cell RNA-seq analysis shows that the DIPs have high expression in a restricted set of fru P1 neurons, whereas the dprs are expressed in larger set of neurons at intermediate levels, with a myriad of combinations.

genomics↗

Modular tissue-specific regulation of doublesex underpins sexually dimorphic development in Drosophila

The ability of a single genome to produce distinct and often dramatically different male and female forms is one of the wonders of animal development. In most animals, sex-specific phenotypes are shaped by interactions between a sex determination pathway and spatial patterning gene networks. In Drosophila melanogaster, most sexually dimorphic traits are controlled by sex-specific isoforms of the doublesex (dsx) transcription factor, and dsx expression is mostly limited to cells that give rise to sexually dimorphic traits. However, it is unknown how this mosaic of \"sex-naive\" and \"sex-aware\" tissues arises. Here, we characterize the cis-regulatory sequences that control dsx expression in the foreleg, which contains multiple types of sex-specific sensory organs. We find that separate modular enhancers are responsible for dsx expression in each sexually dimorphic organ. Expression of dsx in the sex comb is co-regulated by two enhancers with distinct spatial and temporal specificities that are separated by a genitalia-specific enhancer. Thus, the mosaic of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic organs depends on modular regulation of dsx transcription by dedicated cell type-specific enhancers.\n\nSummary StatementWe identify the modular cis-regulatory elements that direct expression of doublesex in sexually dimorphic structures in Drosophila legs and genitalia. This regulatory landscape provides insight into how cells obtain their sex-specific identity.

developmental biology↗