bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Anurag, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Anurag, M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Rat somatic genome editing enables ER+ breast cancer modeling

Genetically engineered mouse models have advanced cancer research but often fail to capture key features of certain human tumors. Rats, with distinct physiology and tumor biology, offer a powerful alternative, yet their use has been constrained by technical barriers to genome editing. Here, we report efficient somatic genome editing in rats, enabling both Indel and substitution mutations. We then apply this approach to model estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, which accounts for [~]70% of human cases but remains poorly represented in mice. The resulting rat tumors reproduce hallmarks of human ER+ breast cancer, including ductal histology, hormone responsiveness, and immune-microenvironmental features. By contrast, identical genetic alterations in mice failed to yield ER+ tumors, underscoring critical species differences in tumorigenesis. Together, this work establishes a versatile platform for rapid generation of clinically relevant rat tumor models, opening new avenues to dissect tumor biology, therapeutic response, and immune interactions in previously inaccessible cancer subtypes.

cancer biology↗

Patient-Derived Xenografts of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Enable Deconvolution and Prediction of Chemotherapy Responses

Chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) combine agents without knowing which agents drive response. Consequently, predictors derived from multi-agent regimens cannot be assumed to generalize to individual drugs or other regimens, motivating development of treatment-matched predictors. Here, we used TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) treated with carboplatin, docetaxel, or the combination to deconvolute drug-specific responses and identify associated molecular features. Combination treatment rarely improved upon the best single agent, with enhanced responses in only 13% of PDXs and antagonism in a comparable fraction. Proteogenomic analyses identified high cytokeratin-5 (KRT5) as a general marker of chemotherapy responsiveness and KRT5 immunohistochemistry discriminated responsive PDXs (AUROC, 0.83). To train treatment-specific predictors, we integrated these data with independent PDX and clinical cohorts with responses assessed after anthracycline-free platinum, taxane, or platinum-taxane therapy, ensuring response corresponded to the modeled treatment. Four feature selection strategies yielded largely nonoverlapping biomarker panels converging on treatment-relevant pathways. On independent test data, RNA-based predictors of complete response (CR) to platinum-based (carboplatin or cisplatin) and taxane-based (docetaxel or paclitaxel) chemotherapy achieved AUROCs of 0.80 and 0.86, respectively. For platinum-taxane regimens (carboplatin plus docetaxel or paclitaxel), proteomic-guided feature selection generated a 10-biomarker, protein- informed RNA predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) that outperformed RNA-only feature selection and achieved an AUROC of 0.85 in an independent clinical cohort, while retaining practicality as an RNA-based assay. Treatment-matched integration of multi-omic PDX and clinical datasets provides a framework for chemotherapy-specific predictors with clinically relevant performance, supporting biomarker-guided precision selection and treatment optimization for patients with TNBC. Statement of significanceIntegration of multi-omic data from patient-derived xenografts with treatment-matched clinical cohorts yielded three retrospectively validated predictors of platinum, taxane, and platinum+taxane response, enabling biomarker-guided chemotherapy selection for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

cancer biology↗

Kinase Inhibitor Pulldown Assay (KiP) for Clinical Proteomics

Protein kinases are frequently dysregulated and/or mutated in cancer and represent essential targets for therapy. Accurate quantification is essential, but current approaches are inadequate. For breast cancer treatment for example, the identification and quantification of the protein kinase ERBB2 is critical for therapeutic decisions. While immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the current clinical diagnostic approach, it is only semiquantitative. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics offers more quantitative assays that, unlike IHC, can be used to accurately evaluate hundreds of kinases simultaneously. The enrichment of less abundant kinase targets for quantification, along with depletion of interfering proteins, improves sensitivity and thus promotes more effective downstream analyses. Multiple kinase inhibitors were therefore deployed as a capture matrix for kinase inhibitor pulldown (KiP) assays designed to profile the human protein kinome as broadly as possible. Optimized assays were initially evaluated in 16 patient derived xenograft models (PDX) where KiP identified multiple differentially expressed and biologically relevant kinases. From these analyses, an optimized single-shot parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) method was developed to improve quantitative fidelity. The PRM KiP approach was then reapplied to low quantities of proteins typical of protein yields from core needle biopsies of human cancers. The initial prototype targeting 100 kinases recapitulated intrinsic subtyping of PDX models obtained from comprehensive proteomic and transcriptomic profiling. Luminal and HER2 enriched OCT-frozen patient biopsies subsequently analyzed through KiP-PRM also clustered by subtype. Finally, stable isotope labeled peptide standards were developed to define a prototype clinical method.

biochemistry↗

Microscaled Proteogenomic Methods for Precision Oncology

Cancer proteogenomics integrates genomics, transcriptomics and mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics to gain insights into cancer biology and treatment efficacy. A proteogenomics approach was therefore developed for frozen core biopsies using tissue-sparing specimen processing with a \"microscaled\" proteomics workflow. For technical proof-of-principle, biopsies from ERBB2 positive breast cancers before and 48-72 hours after the first dose of neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy were analyzed. ERBB2 protein and phosphosite levels, as well as mTOR target phosphosites, were significantly more suppressed upon treatment in cases associated with pathological complete response, suggesting MS-based pharmacodynamics is achievable. Furthermore, integrated analyses indicated potential causes of treatment resistance including the absence of ERBB2 amplification (false-ERBB2 positive) and insufficient ERBB2 activity for therapeutic sensitivity despite ERBB2 amplification (pseudo-ERBB2 positive). Candidate resistance features in true-ERBB2+ cases, including androgen receptor signaling, mucin expression and an inactive immune microenvironment were observed. Thus, proteogenomic analysis of needle core biopsies is feasible and clinical utility should be investigated.

cancer biology↗

The prognostic effects of somatic mutations in ER-positive breast cancer

More than 50 genes are recurrently affected by somatic mutation in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but prognostic effects have not been definitively established. Primary tumor DNA was therefore subjected to targeted sequencing from 625 postmenopausal (UBC-TAM series) and 328 premenopausal (MA12 trial) hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients. Independent validation of prognostic interactions was achieved using independent data from the METABRIC study. Associations between MAP3K1 and PIK3CA with luminal A status and TP53 mutations with Luminal B/non-luminal tumors were observed, validating the methodological approach. In UBC-TAM, NF1 frame-shift nonsense (FS/NS) mutation was validated as a poor outcome driver. For MA12, poor outcome associated with PIK3R1 mutation was similarly validated. DDR1 mutations were strongly associated with poor prognosis in UBC-TAM despite stringent false-discovery correction (q=0.0003). In conclusion, uncommon recurrent somatic mutations should be further explored to create a more complete explanation of the highly variable outcomes that typify ER+ breast cancer.

genomics↗