Biology subjects

Anttila, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Anttila, V..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Large-Scale Genome-Wide Meta Analysis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Suggests Shared Genetic Architecture for Different Diagnosis Criteria.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a disorder characterized by hyperandrogenism, ovulatory dysfunction and polycystic ovarian morphology. Affected women frequently have metabolic disturbances including insulin resistance and dysregulation of glucose homeostasis. PCOS is diagnosed with two different sets of diagnostic criteria, resulting in a phenotypic spectrum of PCOS cases. The genetic similarities between cases diagnosed with different criteria have been largely unknown. Previous studies in Chinese and European subjects have identified 16 loci associated with risk of PCOS. We report a meta-analysis from 10,074 PCOS cases and 103,164 controls of European ancestry and characterisation of PCOS related traits. We identified 3 novel loci (near PLGRKT, ZBTB16 and MAPRE1), and provide replication of 11 previously reported loci. Identified variants were associated with hyperandrogenism, gonadotropin regulation and testosterone levels in affected women. Genetic correlations with obesity, fasting insulin, type 2 diabetes, lipid levels and coronary artery disease indicate shared genetic architecture between metabolic traits and PCOS. Mendelian randomization analyses suggested variants associated with body mass index, fasting insulin, menopause timing, depression and male-pattern balding play a causal role in PCOS. Only one locus differed in its association by diagnostic criteria, otherwise the genetic architecture was similar between PCOS diagnosed by self-report and PCOS diagnosed by NIH or Rotterdam criteria across common variants at 13 loci.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Common variant burden contributes significantly to the familial aggregation of migraine in 1,589 families

It has long been observed that complex traits, including migraine, often aggregate in families, but the underlying genetic architecture behind this is not well understood. Two competing hypotheses exist, emphasizing either rare or common genetic variation. More specifically, familial aggregation could be predominantly explained by rare, penetrant variants that segregate according to Mendelian inheritance or rather by the sufficient polygenic accumulation of many common variants, each with an individually small effect. Some combination of both common and rare variation could also contribute towards a spectrum of disease risk.\n\nWe investigated this in a collection of 8,319 individuals across 1,589 migraine families from Finland. Family members were individually diagnosed by a migraine-specific questionnaire with either migraine without aura (MO, ICHD-3 code 1.1, n=2,357), migraine with typical aura (ICHD- 3 code 1.2.1, n=2,420), hemiplegic migraine (HM, ICHD-3 code 1.2.3, n=540), or no migraine (n=3,002). For comparison, we used population-based migraine cases (n=1,101) and controls (n=13,369) from the FINRISK study. The disease status of FINRISK individuals was assigned based on health registry data from outpatient clinics and/or prescription medication. All individuals were genotyped on the Illumina(R) CoreExome or PsychArray chip platforms and imputed to a Finnish reference panel of 6,962 haplotypes. Polygenic risk scores (PRS), representing the common variant burden in each individual, were calculated using weights from the most recent large-scale genome-wide association study of migraine. To account for family structure in our analyses, we used a mixed-model approach, adjusting for the genetic relationship matrix as a random effect.\n\nWe found a significantly higher common variant burden in familial cases of migraine (for all subtypes, measured by the odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation [SD] increase in PRS; OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.71-1.81, P = 1.7x10-109) compared to cases from a population cohort (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.25-1.38, P = 7.2x10-17) when using the population controls as a reference group. The highest enrichment was observed for HM (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.86-2.07, P = 8.7x10-36) and migraine with typical aura (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.79-1.91, P = 1.4x10-86) but enrichment was also present for MO (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.51-1.63, P = 1.1x10-48). Comparing within cases, there was no significant difference in common variant burden between the migraine with aura subtypes, HM and migraine with typical aura (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.99-1.19, P = 0.09), but both showed significantly higher enrichment compared to MO (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.17-1.38, P = 7.3x10-7, and OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.11-1.23, P = 4.62x10-5, respectively). Additionally, we found that higher common variant burden corresponded to earlier age of headache onset (OR per SD increase in PRS for 3,631 cases with onset before 20 years old compared to 1,686 cases with onset later than 20 years old; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05-1.18, P = 8.3x10-4). FINRISK population cases identified from national health registry data were found to have lower common variant burden in comparison to the familial migraine cases (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.25-1.38, P = 6.8x10-17), unless the individuals had attended both a specialist clinic and also received prophylactic migraine treatment (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.53-1.88, P = 3.9x10-9). Finally, although rare variants have been suggested as the primary cause for familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), we found only four out of 45 sequenced FHM families (8.9%) with a pathogenic mutation in one of the known risk genes.\n\nIn summary, our results demonstrate a substantial contribution of common polygenic variation to familial aggregation in migraine, comparable to both controls and that observed in migraine cases from a population cohort. The findings also suggest that individuals with migraine aura symptoms (either typical aura, which is mostly visual, or rare motor aura) tend to have higher common variant burden on average supporting the polygenic model also in these migraine subtypes.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Heterogeneous Contribution of Microdeletions in the Development of Common Generalized and Focal epilepsies

BackgroundMicrodeletions are known to confer risk to epilepsy, particularly at genomic rearrangement \"hotspot\" loci. However, deciphering their role outside hotspots and risk assessment by epilepsy sub-type has not been conducted.\n\nMethodsWe assessed the burden, frequency and genomic content of rare, large microdeletions found in a previously published cohort of 1,366 patients with Genetic Generalized Epilepsy (GGE) plus two sets of additional unpublished genome-wide microdeletions found in 281 Rolandic Epilepsy (RE) and 807 Adult Focal Epilepsy (AFE) patients, totaling 2,454 cases. These microdeletion sets were assessed in a combined analysis and in sub-type specific approaches against 6,746 ethnically matched controls.\n\nResultsWhen hotspots are considered, we detected an enrichment of microdeletions in the combined epilepsy analysis (adjusted-P= 2.00x10-7; OR = 1.89; 95%-CI: 1.51-2.35), where the implicated microdeletions overlapped with rarely deleted genes and those involved in neurodevelopmental processes. Sub-type specific analyses showed that hotspot deletions in the GGE subgroup contribute most of the signal (adjusted-P = 1.22x10-12; OR = 7.45; 95%-CI = 4.20-11.97). Outside hotspot loci, microdeletions were enriched in the GGE cohort for neurodevelopmental genes (adjusted-P = 4.78x10-3; OR = 2.30; 95%-CI = 1.42-3.70), whereas no additional signal was observed for RE and AFE. Still, gene content analysis was able to identify known (NRXN1, RBFOX1 and PCDH7) and novel (LOC102723362) candidate genes affected in more than one epilepsy sub-type but not in controls.\n\nConclusionsOur results show a heterogeneous effect of recurrent and non-recurrent microdeletions as part of the genetic architecture of GGE and a minor to negligible contribution in the etiology of RE and AFE.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Heritability enrichment of specifically expressed genes identifies disease-relevant tissues and cell types

Genetics can provide a systematic approach to discovering the tissues and cell types relevant for a complex disease or trait. Identifying these tissues and cell types is critical for following up on non-coding allelic function, developing ex-vivo models, and identifying therapeutic targets. Here, we analyze gene expression data from several sources, including the GTEx and PsychENCODE consortia, together with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for 48 diseases and traits with an average sample size of 169,331, to identify disease-relevant tissues and cell types. We develop and apply an approach that uses stratified LD score regression to test whether disease heritability is enriched in regions surrounding genes with the highest specific expression in a given tissue. We detect tissue-specific enrichments at FDR < 5% for 34 diseases and traits across a broad range of tissues that recapitulate known biology. In our analysis of traits with observed central nervous system enrichment, we detect an enrichment of neurons over other brain cell types for several brain-related traits, enrichment of inhibitory over excitatory neurons for bipolar disorder but excitatory over inhibitory neurons for schizophrenia and body mass index, and enrichments in the cortex for schizophrenia and in the striatum for migraine. In our analysis of traits with observed immunological enrichment, we identify enrichments of T cells for asthma and eczema, B cells for primary biliary cirrhosis, and myeloid cells for Alzheimer's disease, which we validated with independent chromatin data. Our results demonstrate that our polygenic approach is a powerful way to leverage gene expression data for interpreting GWAS signal.

genetics↗