bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Andrzejak, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Andrzejak, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Herbivores and pathogens can modulate plant population responses to future climate conditions

Climate change is expected to alter plant populations not only through direct environmental shifts but also via changes in biotic interactions, such as with herbivores and pathogens. As plant species are also expected to differ in their responses to both climate and antagonists, plant responses to both factors are expected to be variable and species-specific. To assess whether interactive effects of climate and antagonists on plant population dynamics are common and whether the strength and direction of plant responses vary across species, we conducted a multi-year field experiment that manipulated realistic climate change and experimentally reduced insect herbivores and fungal pathogens. We measured responses of plant vital rates, such as survivorship, growth, and reproduction across six grassland species. Using Integral Projection Models (IPMs) and Life Table Response Experiments (LTREs), we quantified changes in population growth rate across experimental treatments and the contribution of each vital rate to that observed change. Two of the study species declined so drastically over the course of the experiment that demographic quantification of population growth rates was not possible. From the remaining species, Bromus erectus and Plantago lanceolata show significant interactive responses of climate and antagonist reduction on population growth rates. In contrast, Dianthus carthusianorum and Tragopogon orientalis showed limited responses to experimental treatments. Notably, our results indicate that in some species biotic interactions may amplify the effects of climate change: the presence of plant antagonists exacerbates the negative effects of the future climate treatment on plant population dynamics. Our findings highlight the complexity in predicting plant population responses to climate change and provide insights for grassland management under future environmental conditions.

ecology↗

Biotic modulators of global change effects on plant communities

Understanding and predicting future plant biodiversity and productivity is critical for prioritizing global change mitigation, conservation, and restoration efforts. One major challenge is that we know remarkably little of how interspecific interactions may modulate the effects of global change factors on diversity and productivity. Here, we develop and test a synthetic conceptual framework about how different biotic modulators (herbivory, plant-plant interactions, pathogens, mycorrhiza) can either amplify or mitigate the effects of global change drivers (nutrient and CO2 enrichment, changes in rainfall and temperature) on plant community biomass and diversity. We report that herbivores mitigated both biomass increment and diversity decline caused by different global change drivers, while plant competition did not significantly alter global change impacts due to mixed effects (both amplification and mitigation). Pathogens tended to function similarly to herbivores, while mycorrhiza both amplified and mitigated community responses. Our conceptual framework further identifies mechanisms by which species interactions can modify global change effects, provides new testable hypotheses, and identifies research gaps and future research directions. We conclude that plant consumers can be important agents stabilizing plant productivity and safeguarding plant biodiversity in the Anthropocene, while more research is urgently needed to understand the role of other biotic modulators.

ecology↗

Low land-use intensity buffers grasslands against future climate and inter-annual climate variability in a large field experiment

Climate and land-use change are key drivers of global change. Full-factorial field experiments in which both drivers are manipulated are essential to understand and predict their potentially interactive effects on the structure and functioning of grassland ecosystems. Here, we present eight years of data on grassland dynamics from the Global Change Experimental Facility (GCEF) in Central Germany. On large experimental plots, temperature and seasonal patterns of precipitation are manipulated by superimposing regional climate model projections onto background climate variability. Climate manipulation is factorially crossed with agricultural land-use scenarios, including intensively used meadows and extensively used (i.e. low-intensity) meadows and pastures. Inter-annual variation of background climate during our study years was high, including three of the driest years on record for our region. The effects of this temporal variability far exceeded the effects of the experimentally imposed climate change on plant species diversity and productivity, especially in the intensively used, species-poor grasslands. These changes in productivity and diversity in response to alterations in climate were due to immigrant species replacing the target forage cultivars. This shift from forage cultivars to immigrant species may impose additional economic costs in terms of a decreasing fodder value and the need for more frequent management measures. In contrast, the extensively used, species-rich grasslands showed weaker responses to both experimentally manipulated future climate and inter-annual climate variability, suggesting that these diverse grasslands are more resistant to climate change than intensively used, species-poor grasslands. We therefore conclude that an extensive management of agricultural grasslands, together with other measures to increase species diversity, can stabilize primary productivity under climate change.

ecology↗

Effects of climate change and grassland management on plant population dynamics are mediated by changes in reproductive success

Climate change is one of the largest threats to grassland plant species, which can be modified by land management. Although climate change and land management can separately and interactively influence plant demography this has been rarely considered within one experimental set-up. We used a large-scale experiment to quantify the effects of grassland management, climate change and their joint effect on the demography and population growth rate of 11 native plant species. We parameterized integral projection models with four years of demographic data to project the population growth rate. We hypothesized, plants would perform better in ambient than in the future climate treatment that creates hotter and drier summer conditions and that plant performance in grazing vs. mowing would vary across species and depend on their traits. Due to extreme drought events, over half of our study species went quasi extinct, which highlights how extreme climate events can influence long term experimental results. Of the persistent species, only one supported our expectations, and the rest either had higher population growth rates in the future climate treatment or showed no significant difference in population growth between climate treatments. Species with shorter flowering durations performed better in the mowing treatment while those with longer flowering durations performed better in the grazing treatment. The population growth rates of these species were sensitive to changes in vital rates related to reproduction and recruitment. Depending on the species we found effects of land management and climate change on population growth rates but we did not find strong support for interactive effects among both factors. Experiments combined with measuring plant demographic responses provide a way to isolate the effects of different drivers on the long-term persistence of species, and to identify the demographic vital rates that are critical to manage in the future. Our study suggests that it will become increasingly difficult to maintain species with preferences for moister soil conditions, that traits such as flowering duration might predict responses to management, and that vital rates such as reproduction and recruitment are disproportionately important.

ecology↗