bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Andricopulo, A. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Andricopulo, A. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Semantic-Aware Graph Embedding Approach Uncovers LC-61, a Potent Anti-Leishmania infantum Compound

Visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum remains a lethal disease with few therapeutic options, necessitating innovative computational methods approaches to accelerate drug discovery. Here, we present a semantic-aware graph neural network (GNN) framework that features holistic mechanisms to capture long-range molecular interactions and the chemical semantics of antileishmanial compounds. Across two classificatory antileishmanial datasets, our holistic GNNs demonstrated significant improvements in predictive performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) increases of 2.2-29.2% on the unbalanced dataset (1 {micro}M threshold) and 3.4-22.5% on the balanced dataset (10 {micro}M threshold) compared to default GNNs. Subsequently, the framework was applied to screen a library of approximately 1.3 million compounds, pinpointing LC-61 as a potent antileishmanial agent with nanomolar activity against intracellular L. infantum (IC50 = 0.076 {micro}M) and minimal cytotoxicity to macrophages (THP-1 CC50 = 157 {micro}M). A comprehensive in vitro ADME profiling revealed that LC-61 combines high solubility at both acidic and physiological pH (>28 {micro}g/mL), balanced lipophilicity (eLogD = 4.07), and favorable passive permeability (PAMPA = 4.86 x 10-6 cm/s), while exhibiting lower microsomal stability. Overall, our semantic-aware GNN framework effectively accelerated the discovery of LC-61, a novel and biologically validated hit suitable for hit-to-lead optimization.

bioinformatics↗

Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science

Concerns over the replicability and reproducibility of published research have grown in many research fields, but empirical data to inform policies are still scarce. Biomedical research in Brazil expanded rapidly over the last three decades, with no systematic assessment of the replicability of its findings. With this in mind, we set up the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative, a multicenter replication of published experiments from Brazilian science using three common experimental methods: the MTT assay, the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the elevated plus maze (EPM). A total of 56 laboratories performed 143 replications of 56 experiments; of these, 90 replications of 45 experiments were considered valid by an independent committee. Replication rates for these experiments varied between 20 and 44% according to five predefined criteria. In median terms, ratios between group means were 58% lower in replications than in original experiments, while coefficients of variation were 82% higher. Effect size decrease was smaller for MTT experiments, original results with less variability and those considered more challenging to replicate, while t values for replications were positively correlated with researcher predictions about replicability, and negatively correlated with the rate of publications by the original articles last author. Deviations from preregistered protocols were very common in replications, most frequently due to reasons inherent to the experimental model or related to infrastructure and logistics. Our results highlight factors that limit the replicability of results published by researchers in Brazil and suggest ways by which this scenario can be improved.

scientific communication and education↗