bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Andrei, A. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Andrei, A. R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The intersection between the representation of the stimuli and the choice by neural ensembles in the primary visual cortex of the macaque.

Animals frequently make decisions based on sensory cues. In such a setting, the overlap in the information on the stimulus and on the choice is crucial for the formation of informed behavioral decisions. Yet, how the information on the stimulus and on the choice interact in the brain is poorly understood. Here, we study the representation of a binary decision variable in the primary visual cortex (V1) while macaque monkeys perform delayed match-to-sample task on naturalistic visual stimuli close to psychophysical threshold. Using population vectors, we demonstrate the overlap in decoding spaces on binary stimulus classes "match/non-match" and binary choices "same /different" of the animal. Leveraging this overlap, we use learning from the invariant information across the two classification problems to predict the choice of the animal as a time-dependent population signal. We show the importance of the across-neuron organization and the temporal structure of spike trains for the decision signal and suggest how noise correlations between neurons with similar decoding selectivity are helpful for the accumulation of the decision signal. Finally, we show that decision signal is primarily carried by bursting neurons in the superficial layers of the cortex. Author summaryV1 is necessary for normal visual processing and is known to process features of visual stimuli such as orientation, but whether V1 also encodes behavioral decisions is an unresolved issue, with conflicting evidence. Here, we demonstrate that V1 encodes a mixed variable that contains the information about the stimulus as well as about the choice. We learn the structure of population responses in trials pertaining to the variable "stimulus+choice", and apply the resulting population vectors to trials that differ only about the choice of the animal, but not about the stimulus class. Moreover, we learn structure of population responses on time-averaged data and then apply it on time-dependent (spiking) data. During the late phase of the trial, this procedure allows to predict the upcoming choice of the animal with a time-dependent population signal. The spiking signal of small neural population is sparse, and we hypothesize that positive correlations between neurons in the same decoding pool help the transmission of the decision-related information downstream. We find that noise correlations in the same decoding pool are significantly stronger than across coding pools, which corroborates our hypothesis on the benefit of noise correlations for the read-out of a time-dependent population signal.

neuroscience↗

The structure of the population code in neural ensembles of V4 shapes pair-wise interactions on different time scales.

In visual areas of primates, neurons activate in parallel while the animal is engaged in a behavioral task. In this study, we examine the structure of the population code while the animal performs delayed match to sample task on complex natural images. The macaque monkeys visualized two consecutive stimuli that were either the same or different, while recorded with laminar arrays across the cortical depth in cortical areas V1 and V4. We decoded correct choice behavior from neural populations of simultaneously recorded units. Utilizing decoding weights, we divide neurons in most informative and less informative, and show that most informative neurons in V4, but not in V1, are more strongly synchronized, coupled and correlated than less informative neurons. As neurons are divided in two coding pools according to their coding preference, in V4, but not in V1, spiking synchrony, coupling and correlations within the coding pool are stronger than across coding pools. HighlightsO_LIIn a match-to-sample visual task, responses of neural populations in V1 and in V4 predict the stimulus class better than chance. C_LIO_LIIn V4, informative neurons are more strongly coupled, correlated and synchronized than less informative neurons. C_LIO_LIIn V4, neurons are more strongly coupled, correlated and synchronized within coding pools compared to across coding pools. C_LIO_LICorrelations within coding pools harm the performance of the classifier in both V1 and V4. C_LI

neuroscience↗