bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Amorosino, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Amorosino, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Supervised White Matter Bundle Segmentation in Glioma Patients with Transfer Learning

In clinical neuroscience, the segmentation of the main white matter bundles is propaedeutic for many tasks such as preoperative neurosurgical planning and monitoring of neuro-related diseases. Automating bundle segmentation with data-driven approaches and deep learning models has shown promising accuracy in the context of healthy individuals. The lack of large clinical datasets is preventing the translation of these results to patients. Inference on patients data with models trained on healthy population is not effective because of domain shift. This study aims to carry out an empirical analysis to investigate how transfer learning might be beneficial to overcome these limitations. For our analysis, we consider a public dataset with hundreds of individuals and a clinical dataset of glioma patients. We focus our preliminary investigation on the corticospinal tract. The results show that transfer learning might be effective in partially overcoming the domain shift.

neuroscience↗

How Does White Matter Registration Affect Tractography Alignment?

Tractography is a powerful method to represent the structural connectivity of the brain white matter. Nevertheless, the comparison of these data structures between two individuals is still an open challenge because of their complexity, e.g. digital representation of millions of fibers as polylines. The scientific community spent a meaningful effort to develop new methods of white matter registration aiming to take advantage of diffusion MRI models. Despite the effort to improve the registration of the white matter, little is known about the effect of the registration on tractogram alignment. The main issue for an empirical evaluation is the lack of ground truth, e.g. a sample of data where the correct alignment is validated by experts. This work aims to overcome this drawback by proposing an evaluation framework based on the matching of homologous fiber structures, e.g. known neuroanatomical bundles. The contribution is a quantitative comparison of how the most representative methods of white matter registration affect tractogram alignment.

neuroscience↗

Connectivity by the Frontal Aslant Tract (FAT) explains local functional specialization of the superior and inferior frontal gyri in humans while choosing predictive over reactive strategies: a tractography-guided TMS study

Predictive and reactive behaviors represent two mutually exclusive strategies for successfully completing a sensorimotor task. It is thought that predictive actions are based on the medial premotor system, in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and reactive stimulus-response behaviors rely on a lateral premotor system, in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). The frontal aslant tract (FAT), a white matter tract connecting SFG and IFG, is a possible neural substrate of the predictive/reactive interactions. We used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of 17 male and female healthy human volunteers, to dissect 3 sub-bundles of fibers belonging to the left FAT (bundles 1, 2 and 3), arising ventrally from 1) the ventral precentral gyrus, 2) midway between the PCG and pars opercularis (POp) and 3) the POp and terminating dorsally in 3 different parts of the SFG, in a caudal-rostral order. We applied online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to 6 spots, corresponding to the medial and lateral terminations of bundles 1-3 during the fixed-duration set period of a delayed reaction task, that can be solved using a predictive (anticipatory) strategy or with a reactive strategy. Results showed that TMS changed the frequency of predictive/reactive strategies only when applied over 2 spots, the SFG and IFG terminations of bundle 2. Importantly, the effects of TMS were opposite when applied to the SFG or to the IFG. Our data show that the SFG and the IFG have opposite roles in producing predictive or reactive behavior and that reciprocal integration or competition is probably mediated by the FAT. Significance StatementAs is well-known by athletes at starting blocks, interaction with the world can occur with a predictive strategy (anticipating a GO-signal) or a reactive strategy (waiting for the GO-signal to be manifest) and they are mutually exclusive. Here we showed, by using non-invasive brain stimulation (TMS), that two specific cortical regions in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) have opposite roles in facilitating a predictive or a reactive strategy. Importantly these two very distant regions but with highly interconnected functions are specifically connected by a small white matter bundle, which probably mediates the competition between predictive and reactive strategies. More generally, we show that the implementing anatomical connectivity in TMS studies strongly reduces spatial noise.

neuroscience↗