Biology subjects

Alzate, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Alzate, A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

The evolutionary age-range size relationship is modulated by insularity and dispersal in plants and animals

Earth is home to millions of plant and animal species, with more than 40 thousand species facing extinction worldwide (Diaz et al. 2019). Species range size is particularly important in this context because it influences extinction risk (Purvis et al. 2000, Gaston & Fuller 2009), but the causes underlying the wide natural variation in range size remain poorly known. Here, we investigate how evolutionary age is related to present-day range size for over 25,000 species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, reef fishes, and plants. We show that, on average, older species have significantly larger ranges, but the effect of age on range size is modulated by clade, geographical context and dispersal ability. Specifically, age does not affect range size for island species, because islands limit dispersal and hence range size, regardless of species age. Furthermore, species from clades with high dispersal capabilities obtain large ranges faster, thereby further neutralizing the relationship between age and range size. Our results can help supporting global conservation priorities, by showing that species that are young, occupy islands, and/or are dispersal limited often have small ranges and therefore increased extinction risk.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Understanding the relationship between dispersal and range size

Understanding what drives the vast variability in species range size is still an outstanding question. Among the several processes potentially affecting species ranges, dispersal is one of the most prominent hypothesized predictors. However, the theoretical expectation of a positive dispersal-range size relationship has received mixed empirical support. Here, we synthesized results from 84 studies to investigate in which context dispersal is most important in driving species range size. We found that dispersal traits - proxies for dispersal ability - explain range sizes more often in temperate and subtropical regions than in tropical regions, when considering multiple components of dispersal, and when investigating a large number of species to capture dispersal and range size variation. In plants, positive effects of dispersal on range size were less often detected when examining broad taxonomic levels. In animals, dispersal is more important for range size increase in ectotherms than in endotherms. Our synthesis emphasizes the importance of considering different aspects of the dispersal process -departure, transfer, settlement-, niche aspects and evolutionary components, like time for range expansion and past geological-environmental dynamics. We therefore call for a more integrative view of the dispersal process and its causal relationship with range size.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

Plant traits are poor predictors of long-term ecosystem functioning

Earth is home to over 350,000 vascular plant species1 that differ in their traits in innumerable ways. Yet, a handful of functional traits can help explaining major differences among species in photosynthetic rate, growth rate, reproductive output and other aspects of plant performance2-6. A key challenge, coined "the Holy Grail" in ecology, is to upscale this understanding in order to predict how natural or anthropogenically driven changes in the identity and diversity of co-occurring plant species drive the functioning of ecosystems7, 8. Here, we analyze the extent to which 42 different ecosystem functions can be predicted by 41 plant traits in 78 experimentally manipulated grassland plots over 10 years. Despite the unprecedented number of traits analyzed, the average percentage of variation in ecosystem functioning that they jointly explained was only moderate (32.6%) within individual years, and even much lower (12.7%) across years. Most other studies linking ecosystem functioning to plant traits analyzed no more than six traits, and when including either only six random or the six most frequently studied traits in our analysis, the average percentage of explained variation in across-year ecosystem functioning dropped to 4.8%. Furthermore, different ecosystem functions were driven by different traits, with on average only 12.2% overlap in significant predictors. Thus, we did not find evidence for the existence of a small set of key traits able to explain variation in multiple ecosystem functions across years. Our results therefore suggest that there are strong limits in the extent to which we can predict the long-term functional consequences of the ongoing, rapid changes in the composition and diversity of plant communities that humanity is currently facing.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

The role of preadaptation, propagule pressure and competition in the colonization of new habitats

To successfully colonize new habitats, organisms not only need to gain access to it, but also need to cope with the selective pressures imposed by the local biotic and abiotic conditions. The number of immigrants, the preadaptation to the local habitat and the presence of competitors are important factors determining the success of colonization. Here, using an experimental set-up, we test the combined effect of propagule pressure, preadaptation and interspecific competition on the colonization success of new habitats using the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) as our model system and the red spider mite (Tetranychus evansi) as a competitor. Our results show that propagule pressure and preadaptation positively affect colonization success. More successful populations reach larger final population sizes either by having higher per capita growth rate (due to preadaptation effect) or by starting a population with a larger number of individuals. Although populations are more successful colonizing non-competitive environments than competitive ones, propagule pressure and preadaptation counteract the negative effects of competition, promoting colonization success. Our results show the importance of propagule pressure and preadaptation to cope both with the exigencies of the new environment and the community context for successful colonization of new habitats.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

A simple spatially explicit neutral model explains range size distribution of reef fishes

AimThe great variation in range sizes among species has fascinated ecologists for decades. In reef-associated fish species, which live in fragmented habitats and adopt a wide range of dispersal strategies, we may expect species with greater dispersal ability to spread over larger ranges. However, empirical evidence for such a positive relationship between dispersal and range size in reef fishes remains scarce. Here, we unveil the more nuanced role of dispersal on the range size distribution of reef associated fishes using empirical data and a novel spatially explicit model.\n\nLocationTropical Eastern Pacific\n\nMajor taxa studiedReef-associated fishes\n\nMethodsWe estimated range size distributions for six different guilds of all reef-associated fishes with different dispersal abilities. We used a one-dimensional spatially explicit neutral model, which simulates the distribution of species along a linear coastline to explored the effect of dispersal, speciation and sampling on the distribution of range sizes. Our model adopts a more realistic gradual speciation process (protracted speciation) and incorporates important long distance dispersal events with a fat-tail dispersal kernel. We simulated our model using a highly efficient coalescence approach, which guarantees the metacommunity, is sampled at dynamic equilibrium. We fitted the model to the empirical data using an approximate Bayesian computation approach, with a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm.\n\nResultsStochastic birth, death, speciation and dispersal events alone can accurately explain empirical range size distributions for six different guilds of tropical, reef-associated fishes. Variation in range size distributions among guilds are explained purely by differences in dispersal ability with the best dispersers covering larger ranges.\n\nMain conclusionsA simple combination of neutral processes with guild-specific dispersal ability provides a general explanation for both within- and across-guild range size variation. Our results support the theoretically expected, but empirically much debated, hypothesis that dispersal promotes range size.

ecology↗