Biology subjects

Alloy, L. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Alloy, L. B..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Utility and validity of group atlas versus personalized functional network approaches for depressive constructs

BackgroundTo understand the neurobiology underlying psychopathology, we need valid measurements of brain function. Group atlases for brain functional connectivity (FC) allow for efficient comparisons, but they fail to account for inter-individual variability in spatial features of networks, a problem that personalized approaches address. We assess the validity and predictive utility of group and personalized approaches of quantifying FC by 1) comparing effect sizes of associations with psychological metrics; and 2) accounting for spatial features of brain networks when examining the association between FC and psychological metrics. Methods324 teens ages 13-16 participated. The personalized approach for estimating networks was a hierarchical Bayesian model. Effect size comparisons were done by comparing the correlations between FC estimated using different methods (group, personalized, and the intersection of the group and personalized maps) and psychological metrics (depression, ruminative coping style, and sensitivity to punishment/reward) with Steiglers Z-test. We also conducted regressions, with psychological metrics as the dependent variables. Those models included FC and spatial features, together and alone. ResultsThe effect size comparisons did not survive FDR correction. However, exploratory permutation tests show that 1) the magnitude of the correlations with depression are larger on average for the intersection estimates of FC than the group estimates; and 2) the magnitude of the correlations with a ruminative coping style are larger on average for the intersection estimates of FC than the personalized estimate. The other comparisons conducted using permutation tests are not significant. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that only spatial features of networks, not FC, are associated with sensitivity to reward. DiscussionThese results imply that the intersection estimates are more valid than the group estimates, and that the intersection estimates have greater predictive utility than personalized estimates. Further, spatial features of networks may be useful in and of themselves in certain contexts. Therefore, researchers in psychiatry should take into consideration spatial features of networks to gain a better understanding of the neurobiology underlying psychopathology.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Trait reward sensitivity and behavioral motivation shape connectivity between the default mode network and the striatum during reward anticipation

Individuals vary substantially in their responses to rewarding events and their motivation to pursue rewards. While the ventral striatum (VS) plays a central role in reward anticipation, its functional connectivity with the default mode network (DMN)--critical for self-referential processing and value integration--potentially represents a key mechanism through which trait differences manifest in reward-related behavior. Here, we examine how trait reward sensitivity and state-level behavioral motivation relate to connectivity between the DMN and VS during reward anticipation. Forty-six participants completed the Monetary Incentive Delay task while undergoing fMRI, with trial types reflecting varying levels of reward and loss salience. Behavioral motivation, indexed by reaction time modulation across high-stakes and low-stakes trials, and self-report measures of anticipatory pleasure and reward sensitivity were assessed. Reward sensitivity interacted with anticipatory pleasure to predict behavioral motivation, such that individuals with higher anticipatory pleasure showed weaker behavioral motivation when reward sensitivity was greater, while those with lower anticipatory pleasure showed stonger behavioral motivation when reward sensitivity was greater. Critically, during high-stakes trials, reward sensitivity was associated with stronger DMN-VS connectivity in highly motivated individuals and weaker connectivity in less motivated participants. This moderation effect was consistent across gain and loss contexts, though with distinct directionality patterns. These findings provide novel insights into the neural correlates of individual differences in reward processing, demonstrating that trait reward sensitivity, anticipatory pleasure, and behavioral motivation are associated with distinct patterns of DMN-VS interactions during reward anticipation. These findings highlight the importance of considering motivational context when investigating reward-related neural mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Social Context and Reward Sensitivity Enhance Corticostriatal Function during Experiences of Shared Rewards

Although prior research has demonstrated enhanced striatal response when sharing rewards with close social connections, less is known about how individual differences affect ventral striatal (VS) activation and connectivity when experiencing rewards within social contexts. Given that self-reported reward sensitivity and level of substance use have been associated with differences in VS activation, we set out to investigate whether these factors would be independently associated with enhancements to neural reward responses within social contexts. In this pre-registered study, participants (N=45) underwent fMRI while playing a card guessing game in which correct or incorrect guesses resulted in monetary gains and losses that were shared evenly with either a close friend, stranger (confederate), or non-human partner. Consistent with our prior work, we found increased VS activation when sharing rewards with a socially close peer as opposed to an out-of-network stranger. As self-reported reward sensitivity increased, the difference in VS response to rewards shared with friends and strangers decreased. We also found enhanced connectivity between the VS and temporoparietal junction when sharing rewards with close friends as opposed to strangers. Finally, exploratory analyses revealed that as reward sensitivity and sub-clinical substance use increase, the difference in VS connectivity with the right fusiform face area increases as a function of social context. These findings demonstrate that responsivity to the context of close friends may be tied to individual reward sensitivity or sub-clinical substance use habits; together these factors may inform predictions of risk for future mental health disorders.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Trait Reward Sensitivity Modulates Connectivity with the Temporoparietal Junction and Anterior Insula during Strategic Decision Making

Many decisions happen in social contexts such as negotiations, yet little is understood about how people balance fairness versus selfishness. Past investigations found that activation in brain areas involved in executive function and reward processing was associated with people offering less with no threat of rejection from their partner, compared to offering more when there was a threat of rejection. However, it remains unclear how trait reward sensitivity may modulate activation and connectivity patterns in these situations. To address this gap, we used task-based fMRI to examine the relation between reward sensitivity and the neural correlates of bargaining choices. Participants (N = 54) completed the Sensitivity to Punishment (SP)/Sensitivity to Reward (SR) Questionnaire and the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System scales. Participants performed the Ultimatum and Dictator Games as proposers and exhibited strategic decisions by being fair when there was a threat of rejection, but being selfish when there was not a threat of rejection. We found that strategic decisions evoked activation in the Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) and the Anterior Insula (AI). Next, we found elevated IFG connectivity with the Temporoparietal junction (TPJ) during strategic decisions. Finally, we explored whether trait reward sensitivity modulated brain responses while making strategic decisions. We found that people who scored lower in reward sensitivity made less strategic choices when they exhibited higher AI-Angular Gyrus connectivity. Taken together, our results demonstrate how trait reward sensitivity modulates neural responses to strategic decisions, potentially underscoring the importance of this factor within social and decision neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Substance use is related to differential activation and connectivity for social relative to monetary rewards

Aberrant levels of reward sensitivity have been linked to substance use disorder and are characterized by alterations in reward processing in the ventral striatum (VS). Less is known about how reward sensitivity and subclinical substance use relate to striatal function during social rewards (e.g., positive peer feedback). Testing this relation is critical for predicting risk for development of substance use disorder. In this pre-registered study, participants (N=44) underwent fMRI while completing well-matched tasks that assess neural response to reward in social and monetary domains. Contrary to our hypotheses, aberrant reward sensitivity blunted the relationship between substance use and striatal activation during receipt of rewards, regardless of domain. Moreover, exploratory whole-brain analyses showed unique relations between substance use and social rewards in temporoparietal junction. Psychophysiological interactions demonstrated that aberrant reward sensitivity is associated with increased connectivity between the VS and ventromedial prefrontal cortex during social rewards. Finally, we found that substance use was associated with decreased connectivity between the VS and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for social rewards, independent of reward sensitivity. These findings demonstrate nuanced relations between reward sensitivity and substance use, even among those without substance use disorder, and suggest altered reward-related engagement of cortico-VS responses as potential predictors of developing disordered behavior.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

The Physiometrics of Inflammatory Proteins and Implications for Medical and Psychiatric Research: Investigation of Empirically-informed Inflammatory Composites

Most research testing the association between inflammation and health outcomes (e.g., heart disease, diabetes, depression) has focused on individual proteins; however, some studies have used summed composites of inflammatory markers without first investigating dimensionality. Using two different samples (MIDUS-2: N = 1,255 adults, MIDUS-R: N = 863 adults), this study investigates the dimensionality of eight inflammatory proteins (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-), fibrinogen, E-selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1) and compared the resulting factor structure to a) an "a priori"/tau-equivalent factor structure in which all inflammatory proteins equally load onto a single dimension (comparable to the summed composites) and b) proteins modeled individually (i.e., no latent variable) in terms of model fit, replicability, reliability, and their associations with health outcomes. An exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure (Factor 1: CRP and fibrinogen; Factor 2: IL-8 and IL-10) in MIDUS-2 and was replicated in MIDUS-R. Results did not clearly indicate whether the empirically-identified factor structure or the individual proteins modeled without a latent variable had superior model fit, but both strongly outperformed the "a priori"/tau-equivalent structure (which did not achieve acceptable model fit in any models). Modeling the empirically-identified factors and individual proteins (without a latent factor) as outcomes of medical diagnoses resulted in comparable conclusions. However, modeling individual proteins resulted in findings more robust to correction for multiple comparisons despite more conservative adjustments. Further, reliability for all latent variables was poor. These results indicate that modeling inflammation as a unidimensional construct equally associated with all available proteins does not fit the data well. Instead, individual inflammatory proteins or, potentially (if empirically supported and biologically-plausible) empirically-identified inflammatory factors should be used in accordance with theory.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2019

Family History of Depression is Associated with Alterations in Task-Dependent Connectivity between the Cerebellum and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex

BackgroundA family history of major depressive disorder (MDD) increases the likelihood of a future depressive episode, which itself poses a significant risk for disruptions in reward processing and social cognition. However, it is unclear whether a family history of MDD is associated with alterations in the neural circuitry underlying reward processing and social cognition. MethodsWe subdivided 279 participants from the Human Connectome Project into three groups: 71 with a lifetime history of MDD, 103 with a family history of MDD (FH), and 105 healthy controls (HC). We then evaluated task-based fMRI data on a social cognition and a reward processing task and found a region of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) that responded to both tasks, independent of group. To investigate whether the vmPFC shows alterations in functional connectivity between groups, we conducted psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analyses using the vmPFC as a seed region. ResultsWe found that FH (relative to HC) was associated with increased sadness scores, and MDD (relative to both FH and HC) was associated with increased sadness and MDD symptoms. Additionally, the FH group had increased vmPFC functional connectivity within the nucleus accumbens, left dorsolateral PFC, and subregions of the cerebellum relative to HC during the social cognition task. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that aberrant neural mechanisms among those with a familial risk of MDD may underlie vulnerability to altered social cognition.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Meta-analysis of Reward Processing in Major Depressive Disorder: Distinct Abnormalities within the Reward Circuit?

Many neuroimaging studies have investigated reward processing dysfunction in major depressive disorder. These studies have led to the common idea that major depressive disorder is associated with blunted responses within the reward circuit, particularly in the ventral striatum. Yet, the link between major depressive disorder and reward-related responses in other regions remains inconclusive, thus limiting our understanding of the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. To address this issue, we performed a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 41 whole-brain neuroimaging studies encompassing reward-related responses from a total of 794 patients with major depressive disorder and 803 healthy controls. Our findings argue against the common idea that major depressive disorder is primarily linked to deficits within the reward system. Instead, our results demonstrate that major depressive disorder is associated with opposing abnormalities in the reward circuit: hypo-responses in the ventral striatum and hyper-responses in the orbitofrontal cortex. The current findings suggest that dysregulated corticostriatal connectivity may underlie reward-processing abnormalities in major depressive disorder, providing an empirical foundation for a more refined understanding of abnormalities in the reward circuitry in major depressive disorder.

neuroscience↗