bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Allouch, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Allouch, S..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

The Lifespan Architecture of Human EEG

Human brain maturation and aging are highly nonlinear, yet their organization at the level of large-scale electrophysiological activity remains poorly understood. We analyzed resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recordings from 1,763 healthy individuals aged 5-85 years to map lifespan trajectories across spectral, complexity, and morphological features. Age-sensitive features clustered into distinct nonlinear trajectories, most commonly showing rapid change during childhood and adolescence followed by stabilization in adulthood, while a smaller subset exhibited turning points in midlife. These trajectories also differed in their spatial expression, ranging from highly conserved scalp-wide patterns to heterogeneous profiles in which the same feature followed distinct trajectories across scalp regions. Transition ages revealed recurring regional sequences, suggesting that diverse EEG features share common reorganization chronologies. Together, these results show that lifespan EEG variation is structured through complementary temporal trajectories, spatial architectures, and regional transition sequences. This normative framework provides a basis for investigating brain development and aging and for identifying atypical patterns associated with neurological and psychiatric disorders.

neuroscience↗

Robust EEG brain-behavior associations emerge only at large sample sizes

Electroencephalography (EEG) offers unique access to the oscillatory dynamics that shape human cognition and behavior. Yet reported associations between EEG features and behavioral measures often fail to replicate, raising fundamental concerns about the robustness of this literature. A key reason is the predominance of small sample sizes (median [~]30 participants), but the consequences for reproducibility have not been systematically evaluated. Here, we provide the first large-scale empirical test of this key issue using the largest available harmonised resting-state EEG dataset, comprising 2,292 participants across healthy individuals and clinical populations. We extracted a comprehensive set of spectral, temporal, complexity, and dynamical features, and assessed their correlations with behavioral, cognitive, and mental health measures. Using extensive resampling across a wide range of sample sizes, we show that small samples produce unstable associations with inflated and inconsistent effect sizes, whereas larger cohorts converge on smaller but reproducible effects. These findings establish sample size as a critical determinant of reliability in EEG research and call for a re-evaluation of how oscillatory dynamics are linked to human cognition. By moving beyond low-powered correlations toward large-scale, reproducible approaches, the field will be better positioned to uncover the true role of neural oscillations in shaping behavior.

neuroscience↗

Sample size critically shapes the reliability of EEG case-control findings in psychiatry

Electroencephalography (EEG) studies in psychiatry have produced highly inconsistent findings, particularly in case-control designs. Small sample sizes are widely assumed to contribute to this variability, yet their impact on the reliability of EEG group comparisons has not been systematically quantified at scale. Here, we address this key gap using a large multisite resting-state EEG dataset comprising 2,874 participants aged 5-18 years, including individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, anxiety, learning disorders, and healthy controls. We extracted a comprehensive set of spectral, temporal, and complexity EEG features and performed repeated case-control comparisons across a wide range of sample sizes using extensive random subsampling. Results from small samples were unstable, with inflated and highly variable effect sizes across iterations. By contrast, larger samples produced consistent and reproducible findings, converging on uniformly small but robust effects. Statistical power rose steeply with sample size, whereas false positive rates remained relatively stable. These results demonstrate the central role of sample size in shaping EEG study outcomes and challenge the utility of conventional case-control approaches for biomarker discovery in psychiatry.

neuroscience↗

Transdiagnostic electrophysiological subtypes reveal brain-behavior dimensions in youth psychiatry

Conventional psychiatric diagnoses often fail to reflect the underlying neurobiological and behavioral complexity of mental health conditions. Here, we propose a transdiagnostic, data-driven framework for stratifying youth based on large-scale multisite electroencephalography (EEG) data from 1,707 individuals aged 5-18 years, including healthy controls and individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), anxiety disorders (ANX), and learning disabilities (LD), along with their common comorbidities. By applying normative modeling to quantify individual deviations from typical brain functional maturation, and integrating multidimensional EEG features across spectral, temporal, complexity, and dynamical domains via similarity network fusion clustering, we identified three robust neurophysiological biotypes. These biotypes showed distinct electrophysiological and behavioral profiles, and captured meaningful brain-behavior relationships. Our findings suggest that biologically informed subtypes capture meaningful neuropsychiatric heterogeneity in youth, challenging conventional diagnostic boundaries in psychiatric nosology.

neuroscience↗

Characterizing the heterogeneity of neurodegenerative diseases through EEG normative modeling

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinsons (PD) and Alzheimers (AD) exhibit considerable heterogeneity of functional brain features within patient populations, complicating diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and drug discovery. Here, we use electroencephalography (EEG) and normative modeling to investigate neurophysiological oscillatory mechanisms underpinning this heterogeneity. To this aim, we use resting-state EEG activity collected by 14 clinical units, in healthy older persons (n=499) and patients with PD (n=237) and AD (n=197), aged over 40 years old. Spectral and source connectivity analyses of EEG activity provided EEG features for normative modeling and deviation measures in the PD and AD patients. Normative models confirmed significant deviations of the EEG features in PD and AD patients over population norms, characterized by high heterogeneity and frequency-dependence. The percentage of patients with at least one deviating EEG feature was [~]30% for spectral measures and [~]80% for functional source connectivity. Notably, the spatial overlap of the deviant EEG features did not exceed 60% for spectral analysis and 25% for functional source connectivity analysis. Furthermore, the patient-specific deviations were correlated with relevant clinical measures, such as the UPDRS for PD (=0.24, p=0.025) and the MMSE for AD (=-0.26, p=0.01), indicating that greater deviations from normative EEG features are associated with worsening score values. These results suggest that the deviation percentage from EEG norms may enrich clinical assessment in PD and AD patients at individual levels in the framework of Precision Neurology.

neuroscience↗

Beyond homogeneity: Charting the landscape of heterogeneity in psychiatric electroencephalography

Electroencephalography (EEG) has been thoroughly studied for decades in psychiatry research. Yet its integration into clinical practice as a diagnostic/prognostic tool remains unachieved. We hypothesize that a key reason is the underlying patients heterogeneity, overlooked in psychiatric EEG research relying on a case-control approach. We combine HD-EEG with normative modeling to quantify this heterogeneity using two well-established and extensively investigated EEG characteristics -spectral power and functional connectivity-across a cohort of 1674 patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, learning disorder, or anxiety, and 560 matched controls. Normative models showed that deviations from population norms among patients were highly heterogeneous and frequency-dependent. Deviation spatial overlap across patients did not exceed 40% and 24% for spectral and connectivity, respectively. Considering individual deviations in patients has significantly enhanced comparative analysis, and the identification of patient-specific markers has demonstrated a correlation with clinical assessments, representing a crucial step towards attaining precision psychiatry through EEG.

neuroscience↗

Effect of analytical variability in estimating EEG-based functional connectivity

The significant degree of variability and flexibility in neuroimaging analysis approaches has recently raised concerns. When running any neuroimaging study, the researcher is faced with a large number of methodological choices, often made arbitrarily. This can produce substantial variability in the results, ultimately hindering research replicability, and thus, robust conclusions. Here, we addressed the analytical variability in the EEG source connectivity pipeline and its effects on outcomes consistency. Like most neuroimaging analyses, the EEG source connectivity analysis involves the processing of high-dimensional data and is characterized by a complex workflow that leads to high analytical variability. In this study, we focused on source functional connectivity variability induced by three key factors along the analysis pipeline: 1) number of EEG electrodes, 2) inverse solution algorithms, and 3) functional connectivity metrics. Outcomes variability was assessed in terms of group-level consistency, inter-, and intra-subjects similarity, using resting-state EEG data (n = 88). As expected, our results showed that different choices related to the number of electrodes, source reconstruction algorithm, and functional connectivity measure substantially affect group-level consistency, between-, and within-subjects similarity. We believe that the significant impact of such methodological variability represents a critical issue for neuroimaging studies that should be prioritized. HighlightsO_LIThe significant impact of methodological variability is a recognized critical priority issue for neuroimaging studies. C_LIO_LIAnalytical variability related to the number of electrodes, source reconstruction algorithm, and functional connectivity measure is a prominent issue in the EEG source connectivity analysis. C_LIO_LIGroup-level consistency, between-, and within-subjects similarity are substantially affected by analytical variability in the EEG source connectivity analysis. C_LI

neuroscience↗

Effect of channel density, inverse solutions and connectivity measures on EEG resting-state networks: a simulation study

Along with the study of brain activity evoked by external stimuli, the past two decades witnessed an increased interest in characterizing the spontaneous brain activity occurring during resting conditions. The identification of the connectivity patterns in this so-called "resting-state" has been the subject of a great number of electrophysiology-based studies, using the Electro/Magneto-Encephalography (EEG/MEG) source connectivity method. However, no consensus has been reached yet regarding a unified (if possible) analysis pipeline, and several involved parameters and methods require cautious tuning. This is particularly challenging when different choices induce significant discrepancy in results and drawn conclusions, thereby hindering reproducibility of neuroimaging research. Hence, our objective in this study was to evaluate some of the parameters related to the EEG source connectivity analysis and shed light on their implications on the accuracy of the resulting networks. We simulated, using neural mass models, EEG data corresponding to two of the resting-state networks (RSNs), namely the default mode network (DMN) and the dorsal attentional network (DAN). We investigated the impact of five channel densities (19, 32, 64, 128, 256), three inverse solutions (weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE), exact low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA), and linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamforming) and four functional connectivity measures (phase-locking value (PLV), phase-lag index (PLI), and amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) with and without source leakage correction), on the correspondence between reconstructed and reference networks. We showed that, with different analytical choices, a high variability is present in the results. More specifically, our results show that a higher number of EEG channels significantly increased the accuracy of the reconstructed networks. Additionally, our results showed a significant variability in the performance of the tested inverse solutions and connectivity measures. In our specific simulation context, eLORETA and wMNE combined with AEC computed between orthogonalized time series exhibited the highest performance in terms of similarity between reconstructed and reference connectivity matrices. Results were similar for both DMN and DAN. We believe that this work could be useful for the field of electrophysiology connectomics, by shedding light on the challenge of analytical variability and its consequences on the reproducibility of neuroimaging studies.

neuroscience↗

Mean-field modeling of brain-scale dynamics for the evaluation of EEG source-space networks

Understanding the dynamics of brain-scale functional networks at rest and during cognitive tasks is the subject of intense research efforts to unveil fundamental principles of brain functions. To estimate these large-scale brain networks, the emergent method called "electroencephalography (EEG) source connectivity" has generated increasing interest in the network neuroscience community, due to its ability to identify cortical brain networks with satisfactory spatio-temporal resolution, while reducing mixing and volume conduction effects. However, no consensus has been reached yet regarding a unified EEG source connectivity pipeline, and several methodological issues have to be carefully accounted for to avoid pitfalls. Thus, a validation toolbox that provides flexible "ground truth" models is needed for an objective methods/parameters evaluation and, thereby an optimization of the EEG source connectivity pipeline. In this paper, we show how a recently developed large-scale model of brain-scale activity, named COALIA, can provide to some extent such ground truth by providing realistic simulations of source-level and scalp-level activity. Using a bottom-up approach, the model bridges cortical micro-circuitry and large-scale network dynamics. Here, we provide an example of the potential use of COALIA to analyze, in the context of epileptiform activity, the effect of three key factors involved in the "EEG source connectivity" pipeline: (i) EEG sensors density, (ii) algorithm used to solve the inverse problem, and (iii) functional connectivity measure. Results showed that a high electrode density (at least 64 channels) is required to accurately estimate cortical networks. Regarding the inverse solution/connectivity measure combination, the best performance at high electrode density was obtained using the weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE) combined with the weighted phase lag index (wPLI). Although those results are specific to the considered aforementioned context (epileptiform activity), we believe that this model-based approach can be successfully applied to other experimental questions/contexts. We aim at presenting a proof-of-concept of the interest of COALIA in the network neuroscience field, and its potential use in optimizing the EEG source-space network estimation pipeline.

neuroscience↗