bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Alameda, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Alameda, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

High arousal disrupts the neural signatures of conflict processing but not behavioural performance

Physical activation fluctuates throughout the day. Previous studies have shown that during periods of reduced activation, cognitive control remains resilient due to neural compensatory mechanisms. In this study, we in-vestigated the effects of high physical activation on both behavioural and neural markers of cognitive control. We hypothesized that while behavioural measures of cognitive control would remain intact during periods of high activation, there would be observable changes in neural correlates. In our electroencephalography study, we manipulated levels of physical activation through physical exercise. Although we observed no significant impact on behavioural measures of cognitive conflict, both univariate and multivariate time-frequency markers proved unreliable under conditions of high activation. Moreover, there was no modulation of whole-brain connectivity measures by physical activation. We suggest that this dissociation between behavioural and neural measures indicates that the human cognitive control system remains resilient even at high activation, possibly due to underlying neural compensatory mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

Staying in control: characterising the mechanisms underlying cognitive control in high and low arousal states

Throughout the day, humans show natural fluctuations in arousal that impact cognitive function. To study the behavioural dynamics of cognitive control during high and low arousal states, healthy participants performed an auditory conflict task during high-intensity physical exercise (N = 39) or drowsiness (N = 33). In line with the pre-registered hypotheses, conflict and conflict adaptation effects were preserved during both altered arousal states. Overall task performance was markedly poorer during low arousal, but not for high arousal. Modelling behavioural dynamics with drift-diffusion analysis revealed evidence accumulation and non-decision time decelerated, and decisional boundaries became wider during low arousal, whereas high arousal was unexpectedly associated with a decrease in the interference of task-irrelevant information processing. These findings show how arousal differentially modulates cognitive control at both sides of normal alertness, and further validates drowsiness and physical exercise as key experimental models to disentangle the interaction between physiological fluctuations on cognitive dynamics.

neuroscience↗