bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Aiello, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Aiello, B..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Flight muscle allocation diverges between two moth families with distinct flight strategies

An animal's musculature must support its specific biomechanical needs, so muscle morphology and volume allocation may adapt when locomotor strategies diversify. We examined muscle size and morphology in two sister families of bombycoid moths, wild silkmoths (Saturniidae) and hawkmoths (Sphingidae), that have diverged in wingbeat frequency, wing morphology, and behavior. Although both families rely on the same muscles to power and steer flight, they may distribute muscle volume differently to prioritize distinct functions. We hypothesized that flight power muscle proportions are larger in hawkmoths and increase with wingbeat frequency, helping meet inertial power demands of high-frequency maneuverable flight. We also hypothesized that some individual muscles diverge in proportional volume and area to support distinct wing control strategies. To test our hypotheses, we took CT scans of twenty bombycoid species and quantified volumes and geometries of six flight muscle pairs. As expected, flight power muscle proportions positively correlate with wingbeat frequency and are generally greater in hawkmoths. Two of three steering muscles diverge substantially in relative volume and area between families. Most muscles exhibit greater length in silkmoths and greater cross-sectional area in hawkmoths. Finally, the dorsal oblique(DO) muscle diverges exceptionally in size and morphology, being highly developed in hawkmoths and smaller or absent in silkmoths. This unexpected difference supports the DO having an underappreciated role in flight control, possibly via shaping indirect strain propagation in the elastic thorax. We show that muscle volume distribution parallels bombycoids' divergent flight strategies, demonstrating how muscle allocation can adapt for specialized functional goals.

evolutionary biology↗

Moth resonant mechanics are tuned to wingbeat frequency and energetic demands.

An insects wingbeat frequency is a critical determinant of its flight performance and varies by multiple orders of magnitude across Insecta. Despite potential energetic and kine-matic benefits for an insect that matches its wingbeat frequency to its resonant frequency, recent work has shown that moths may operate off of their resonant peak. We hypothesized that across species, wingbeat frequency scales with resonance frequency to maintain favorable energetics, but with an offset in species that use frequency modulation as a means of flight control. The moth superfamily Bombycoidea is ideal for testing this hypothesis because their wingbeat frequencies vary across species by an order of magnitude, despite similar morphology and actuation. We used materials testing, high-speed videography, and a "spring-wing" model of resonant aerodynamics to determine how components of an insects flight apparatus (thoracic properties, wing inertia, muscle strain, and aerodynamics) vary with wingbeat frequency. We find that the resonant frequency of a moth correlates with wingbeat frequency, but resonance curve shape (described by the Weis-Fogh number) and peak location vary within the clade in a way that corresponds to frequency-dependent biomechanical demands. Our results demonstrate that a suite of adaptations in muscle, exoskeleton and wing drive variation in resonant mechanics, reflecting potential constraints on matching wingbeat and resonant frequencies.

physiology↗

Wing damage affects flight kinematics but not flower tracking performance in hummingbird hawkmoths

The integrity of their wings is crucial to the many insect species that spend distinct portions of their life in flight. How insects cope with the consequences of wing damage is therefore a central question when studying how robust flight performance is possible with such fragile chitinous wings. It has been shown in a variety of insect species that the loss in lift-force production resulting from wing damage is generally compensated by an increase in wing beat frequency rather than amplitude. The consequences of wing damage for flight performance, however, are less well understood, and vary considerably between species and behavioural tasks. One hypothesis reconciling the varying results is that wing damage might affect fast flight manoeuvres with high acceleration, but not slower ones. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of wing damage on the manoeuvrability of hummingbird hawkmoths (Macroglossum stellatarum) tracking a motorised flower. This assay allowed us to sample a range of movements at different temporal frequencies, and thus assess whether wing damage affected faster or slower flight manoeuvres. We show that hummingbird hawkmoths compensate for the loss in lift force mainly by increasing wing beat amplitude, yet with a significant contribution of wing beat frequency. We did not observe any effects of wing damage on flight manoeuvrability at either high or low temporal frequencies.

animal behavior and cognition↗