bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ahlfors, S. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Ahlfors, S. P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Neuronal modeling of magnetoencephalography responses in auditory cortex to auditory and visual stimuli

Previous studies have demonstrated that auditory cortex activity can be influenced by crosssensory visual inputs. Intracortical recordings in non-human primates (NHP) have suggested a bottom-up feedforward (FF) type laminar profile for auditory evoked but top-down feedback (FB) type for cross-sensory visual evoked activity in the auditory cortex. To test whether this principle applies also to humans, we analyzed magnetoencephalography (MEG) responses from eight human subjects (six females) evoked by simple auditory or visual stimuli. In the estimated MEG source waveforms for auditory cortex region of interest, auditory evoked responses showed peaks at 37 and 90 ms and cross-sensory visual responses at 125 ms. The inputs to the auditory cortex were then modeled through FF and FB type connections targeting different cortical layers using the Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), which consists of a neocortical circuit model linking the cellular- and circuit-level mechanisms to MEG. The HNN models suggested that the measured auditory response could be explained by an FF input followed by an FB input, and the crosssensory visual response by an FB input. Thus, the combined MEG and HNN results support the hypothesis that cross-sensory visual input in the auditory cortex is of FB type. The results also illustrate how the dynamic patterns of the estimated MEG/EEG source activity can provide information about the characteristics of the input into a cortical area in terms of the hierarchical organization among areas. Significance statementLaminar intracortical profiles of activity characterize feedforward- and feedback-type influences in the inputs to a cortical area. By combining magnetoencephalography (MEG) and biophysical computational neural modeling, we obtained evidence of cross-sensory visual evoked activity in human auditory cortex being of feedback type. The finding is consistent with previous intracortical recordings in non-human primates. The results illustrate how patterns of MEG source activity can be interpreted in the context of the hierarchical organization among cortical areas.

neuroscience↗

Visual stimuli modulate local field potentials but drive no high-frequency activity in human auditory cortex

Neuroimaging studies suggest cross-sensory visual influences in human auditory cortices. Whether these influences reflect active visual processing in human auditory cortices (ACs), which drives neuronal firing and concurrent broadband high-frequency activity (BHFA; >70 Hz), or whether they merely modulate sound processing is still debatable. Here, we presented auditory, visual, and audiovisual stimuli to 16 participants (7 women, 9 men) with stereo-EEG depth electrodes implanted near ACs for presurgical monitoring. Anatomically normalized group analyses were facilitated by inverse modeling of intracranial source currents. Analyses of intracranial event-related potentials (iERP) suggested cross-sensory responses to visual stimuli in ACs, which lagged the earliest auditory responses by several tens of milliseconds. Visual stimuli also modulated the phase of intrinsic low-frequency oscillations and triggered 15-30-Hz event-related desynchronization in ACs. However, BHFA, a putative correlate of neuronal firing, was not significantly increased in ACs after visual stimuli, not even when they coincided with auditory stimuli. Intracranial recordings demonstrate cross-sensory modulations, but no indication of active visual processing in human ACs. Significance StatementVisual information has a profound influence on auditory processing, particularly in noisy conditions. These "cross-sensory" influences start already in auditory cortices, the brain area that processes sound signals. It has, however, been unclear whether auditory cortex actively processes visual information or whether visual signals only change the way sounds are processed. We studied this question by neurophysiological recordings from 16 participants with epilepsy who had electrodes implanted in their brains due to medical reasons. Using these intracranial recordings, we show that cross-sensory visual information modulates sound processing but triggers no high-frequency activity -- a correlate of local neuronal firing -- in auditory cortex. This result provides important information on the role of sensory areas in multisensory processing in the human brain.

neuroscience↗