bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Agosto Ramos, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Agosto Ramos, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

ATML1-GIR1-TPL/TPR transcriptional repression module controls glucosinolates and giant cells in Arabidopsis thaliana sepals

Glucosinolates (GSLs) are sulfur- and nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites that serve as defense compounds in Arabidopsis and other members of the Brassicales. Although the enzymatic pathway that produces GSLs is well-studied, the upstream mechanisms that control their tissue-specific synthesis are poorly understood. We identified a novel repression module that transcriptionally regulates GSL levels in sepals, the modified leaves that protect reproductive tissues within the floral bud. GLABRA2 (GL2) INTERACTING REPRESSOR1 (GIR1) interacts directly with Arabidopsis thaliana MERISTEM LAYER1 (ATML1), an HD-Zip IV transcription factor known to be required for giant cell formation in the sepal epidermis. This interaction requires a predicted Zn finger of GIR1 and the C-terminal START adjacent domain (STAD) of ATML1. The gir1 loss-of-function mutants exhibit excess giant cells, in contrast to atml1 mutants which display fewer giant cells, supporting the role of GIR1 as a negative regulator of ATML1. We confirmed that GIR1 interacts with TOPLESS (TPL) and TOPLESS-RELATED (TPR) corepressors, and coimmunoprecipitation demonstrated that GIR1 acts as an adaptor protein connecting ATML1 and TPL/TPR. RNA sequencing revealed that numerous genes involved in GSL biosynthesis, including the key transcriptional regulator MYB29, are upregulated in gir1 mutants. Consistent with the transcriptomic data, chemical analysis revealed that gir1 mutants display elevated GSL levels in sepals. Mass spectrometry imaging confirmed high GSL accumulation in gir1 sepals compared to wild type and atml1. Overall, our findings uncover a previously unrecognized link between cell expansion and GSL metabolism, suggesting strategies for engineering plants with cell-type specific GSL profiles. Significance StatementPlants belonging to the order Brassicales produce sulfur-containing glucosinolate (GSL) metabolites that serve in defense against herbivory. In cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli and kale, these compounds contribute to their unique flavors and health-promoting attributes. In agriculturally important oilseed crops, they affect the palatability of animal feeds. Here, we identified a novel transcriptional regulatory module that controls GSL biosynthesis in the epidermis of the sepal, the floral organ that protects the reproductive tissues. This regulatory module also controls cell expansion of specific cell types in the sepal, demonstrating a surprising connection between cell growth and a chemical defense pathway in plants. Our results suggest strategies for engineering crops with tissue-specific GSL profiles to fit agronomic needs.

plant biology↗

Convergence and constraint in glucosinolate evolution across the Brassicaceae

Diversity in plant specialized metabolites plays critical roles in plant-environment interactions. In longer evolutionary scales, e.g. between families or orders, this diversity arises from whole-genome and tandem duplication events. Less is known about the evolutionary patterns shaping chemical diversity at shorter scales, e.g. within a family. Utilizing the aliphatic glucosinolate pathway we explored how the terminal structural modification enzyme GSL-OH evolved across the Brassicaceae and the genomic processes that control presence-absence variation of its products (R)-2-hydroxy-but-3-enyl and (S)-2-hydroxy-but-3-enyl. We implemented a phylo-functional approach where we functionally validated GSL-OH orthologs across the Brassicaceae and used that information to map the genomic origin and trajectory of the loci. This uncovered a complex mechanism involving at least three ancestral loci with extensive gene loss across all species creating unequal retention across the phylogenetic relationships. Convergent evolution in enantiomeric specificity was observed where several independent species had tandem duplicates diverged towards producing the R or S enantiomers. To explore potential biological differences between the enantiomers, we performed Trichoplusia ni insect assays and Botrytis cinerea detached leaf assays. We found that plants with the S enantiomer were more susceptible to B. cinerea infection while plants with the R enantiomer seemed more susceptible to T. ni herbivory. This variation in activity between the precursor and different enantiomeric products may shape the recurrent evolution of their production.

plant biology↗