bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Adibi, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Adibi, A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Over-Reliance on Prior Expectations in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Cognitive impairment is a common and disabling feature of multiple sclerosis (MS). Bayesian models of perception and action provide a powerful framework to better understand how cognitive processes are altered in MS. In this case-control study, we employed a time reproduction paradigm within a Bayesian framework to investigate the underlying mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. We applied a modified Bayesian observer model, which partitions time reproduction into three stages: sensory measurement, time estimation, and motor response. We found that both MS and control groups showed a systematic bias in reproducing time, overestimating short intervals and underestimating long intervals. This bias was significantly larger in patients with MS compared with controls, reflecting an over-reliance on prior expectations relative to sensory-motor information. Computational modeling indicated that this increased bias in the MS group was driven by greater measurement noise during the sensory stage. Moreover, central tendency bias increases with age in healthy participants as reliance on prior expectations becomes stronger than sensory-motor evidence. Interestingly, we found that this age-related effect on bias was absent in patients with MS. Further analysis showed both younger and older patients performed equally biased, and their performance was similar to older healthy participants.

neuroscience↗

Resource or slot model in visual working memory: Are they different?

When studying the working memory (WM), the slot model and the resource model are two main theories used to describe how information retention occurs. The slot model shows that WM capacity consists of a certain number of predefined slots available for information storage. This theory explains that there is a binary condition during information recall in which information is either wholly maintained within a slot or forgotten. The resource model gives a resolution-based approach defining a continuous resource able to be distributed among an unlimited number of items in the WM capacity. With newer hybrid models suggesting that WM may not strictly conform to one model, this study aimed to understand the relationship between the original models. By implementing correlational assessments of subjects performances in two different psychophysics tasks (analog recall paradigm with sequential bar presentation and delayed match-to-sample task (DMS) with checkerboard stimuli which are representative for resource and slot models, respectively), our study revealed significant correlations between WM performance (measured by DMS tasks) with recall error, precision, and sources of error (measured by sequential paradigm). Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of considering both models in understanding WM processes, shedding light on the debate between slot and resource models by demonstrating overlap in elements of both models.

neuroscience↗

A Mechanistic Insight into Sources of Error of Visual Working Memory in Multiple Sclerosis

Working memory (WM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is mainly studied by the previously established binary model for information storage (slot model). However, recent observations based on the continuous reproduction paradigms have shown that assuming dynamic allocation of WM resources (resource model) instead of the binary hypothesis will give more accurate predictions in WM assessment. Moreover, continuous reproduction paradigms allow for assessing the distribution of error in recalling information, providing new insights into the organization of the WM system. Hence, by utilizing two continuous reproduction paradigms, memory-guided localization (MGL) and analog recall task with sequential presentation, we investigated WM dysfunction in MS. Our results demonstrated an overall increase in recall error and decreased recall precision in MS. Furthermore, computational modeling of the results from the sequential paradigm determined that imprecision in decoding information and swap error (mistakenly reporting the feature of other presented items) were responsible for WM dysfunction in MS. Overall, this study offered a sensitive measure for assessing WM deficit and provided new insight into the organization of the WM system in MS population.

neuroscience↗

Development and External Validation of the Acute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT)

BackgroundAccurate prediction of exacerbation risk enables personalised chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care. We developed and validated a generalisable model to predict the individualised rate and severity of COPD exacerbations. MethodsWe pooled data from three COPD trials on patients with a history of exacerbations. We developed a mixed-effect model to predict exacerbations over one-year. Severe exacerbations were those requiring inpatient care. Predictors were a history of exacerbations, age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, domiciliary oxygen therapy, lung function, symptom burden, and current medication use. ECLIPSE, a multicentre cohort study, was used for external validation. ResultsThe development dataset included 2,380 patients (mean 64{middle dot}7 years, 1373 [57{middle dot}7%] men, mean exacerbation rate 1{middle dot}42/year, 0{middle dot}29/year [20{middle dot}5%] severe). When validated against all COPD patients in ECLIPSE (n=1819, mean 63{middle dot}3 years, 1186 [65{middle dot}2%] men, mean exacerbation rate 1{middle dot}20/year, 0{middle dot}27/year [22{middle dot}2%] severe), the area-under-curve was 0{middle dot}81 (95%CI 0{middle dot}79-0{middle dot}83) for [≥]2 exacerbations and 0{middle dot}77 (95%CI 0{middle dot}74-0{middle dot}80) for [≥]1 severe exacerbation. Predicted rates were 0{middle dot}25/year for severe and 1{middle dot}31/year for all exacerbations, close to the observed rates (0{middle dot}27/year and 1{middle dot}20/year, respectively). In ECLIPSE patients with a prior exacerbation history (n=996, mean 63{middle dot}6 years, 611 (61{middle dot}3%) men, mean exacerbation rate 1{middle dot}82/year, 0{middle dot}40/year [22{middle dot}0%] severe), the area-under-curve was 0{middle dot}73 (95%CI 0{middle dot}70-0{middle dot}76) for [≥]2 exacerbations and 0{middle dot}74 (95%CI 0{middle dot}70-0{middle dot}78) for [≥]1 severe exacerbation. Calibration was accurate for severe exacerbations (predicted=0{middle dot}37/year, observed=0{middle dot}40/year) and all exacerbations (predicted=1{middle dot}80/year, observed=1{middle dot}82/year). The model is accessible at http://resp.core.ubc.ca/ipress/accept. InterpretationThis model can be used as a decision tool to personalise COPD treatment and prevent exacerbations. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSPreventing future exacerbations is a major goal in COPD care. Because of adverse effects, preventative treatments should be reserved for those at a higher risk of future exacerbations. Predicting exacerbation risk in individual patients can guide these clinical decisions. A 2017 systematic review reported that of the 27 identified COPD exacerbation prediction tools, only two had reported external validation and none was ready for clinical implementation. To find the studies that were published afterwards, we searched PubMed for articles on development and validation of COPD exacerbation prediction since 2015, using the search terms "COPD", "exacerbation", "model", and "validation". We included studies that reported prediction of either the risk or the rate of exacerbations and excluded studies that did not report external validation. Our literature search revealed two more prediction models neither of which was deemed generalisable due to lack of methodological rigour, or local and limited nature of the data available to investigators. Added value of this studyWe used data from three randomised trials to develop ACCEPT, a clinical prediction tool based on routinely available predictors for COPD exacerbations. We externally validated ACCEPT in a large, multinational prospective cohort. To our knowledge, ACCEPT is the first COPD exacerbation prediction tool that jointly estimates the individualised rate and severity of exacerbations. Successful external validation of ACCEPT showed that its generalisability can be expanded across geography and beyond the setting of therapeutic trials. ACCEPT is designed to be easily applicable in clinical practice and is readily accessible as a web application. Implications of all the available evidenceCurrent guidelines rely on a history of exacerbations as the sole predictor of future exacerbations. Simple clinical and demographic variables, in aggregate, can be used to predict COPD exacerbations with improved accuracy. ACCEPT enables a more personalised approach to treatment based on routinely collected clinical data by allowing clinicians to objectively differentiate risk profiles of patients with similar exacerbation history. Care providers and patients can use individualised exacerbation risk estimates to decide on preventive therapies based on objectively-established or patient-specific thresholds for treatment benefit and harm. COPD clinical researchers can use this tool to target enriched populations for enrolment in clinical trials.

epidemiology↗

The projected economic and health burden of uncontrolled asthma in the United States

RationaleDespite effective treatments, a large proportion of asthma patients do not achieve sustained asthma control. The preventable burden associated with lack of proper control is likely taking a high toll at the population level.\n\nObjectiveWe predicted the future health and economic burden of uncontrolled asthma among American adults for the next 20 years.\n\nMethodsWe built a probabilistic model that linked state-specific estimates of population growth, asthma prevalence rates, and distribution of asthma control levels. We conducted several meta-analyses to estimate the adjusted differences in healthcare resource use, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and productivity loss across control levels. We projected, nationally and at the state-level, total direct and indirect costs (in 2018 USD) and QALYs lost due to uncontrolled asthma from 2019 to 2038 in the United States.\n\nMeasurements and Main ResultsOver the next 20 years, the total undiscounted direct costs associated with suboptimal asthma control will be $300.6 billion (95% confidence interval [CI] $190.1 - $411.1). When indirect costs are added, total economic burden will be $963.5 billion (95%CI $664.1 - $1,262.9). American adolescents and adults will lose 15.46 million (95%CI 12.77 million - 18.14 million) QALYs over this period due to suboptimal control of asthma. In state-level analysis, the average 20-year per-capita costs due to uncontrolled asthma ranged from $2,209 (Arkansas) to $6,132 (Connecticut).\n\nConclusionThe burden of uncontrolled asthma will continue to grow for the next twenty years. Strategies towards better management of asthma may be associated with substantial return on investment.

epidemiology↗

Development and validation of the Evaluation Platform In COPD (EPIC): a population-based outcomes model of COPD for Canada

BackgroundWe report the development, validation, and implementation of an open-source population-based outcomes model of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) for Canada.\n\nMethodsEvaluation Platform in COPD (EPIC) is a discrete event simulation model of Canadians 40 years of age or older. Three core features of EPIC are its open-population design (incorporating projections of future population growth, aging, and smoking trends), its incorporation of heterogeneity in lung function decline and burden of exacerbations, and its modeling of the natural history of COPD from inception. Multiple original data analyses, as well as values reported in the literature, were used to populate the model. Extensive face validity as well as internal and external validity evaluations were performed.\n\nResultsThe model was internally validated on demographic projections, mortality rates, lung function trajectories, COPD exacerbations, and stability of COPD prevalence over time within strata of risk factors. In external validation, it moderately overestimated rate of overall exacerbations in two independent trials, but generated consistent estimates of rate of severe exacerbations and mortality.\n\nLimitationsIn its current version, EPIC does not consider uncertainty in the evidence. Several components such as additional (e.g., environmental and occupational) risk factors, treatment, symptoms, and comorbidity will have to be added in future iterations.\n\nConclusionsEPIC is the first multi-purpose outcome- and policy-focused model of COPD for Canada. By modeling the natural history of COPD from its inception, it is capable of modeling the outcomes of decisions across the entire care pathway of COPD. Platforms of this type have the capacity to be iteratively updated to incorporate the latest evidence and to project the outcomes of many different scenarios within a consistent framework.

epidemiology↗