bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Adaway, K. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Adaway, K. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Wild raccoons are more innovative but not bolder than another ecological generalist, the Virginia opossum, on a pull-string task

Humans are altering natural environments at unprecedented rates. Ecological generalism is one of the strongest predictors of survival in light of these changes which, in animals, may be shaped by bold and innovative behaviours. Species with greater habitat generalism are proposed to behave more boldly (e.g., touching and ingesting novel food). Species with greater dietary generalism are proposed to behave more innovatively (e.g., novel problem-solving to access food). Support for both hypotheses exists but remains largely restricted to broad comparisons between generalists and specialists. Further comparative data are needed to understand the extent to which these behavioural patterns might shape more nuanced ecological variation between species, such as species with finer-scale niche differences. We compared bold and innovative behaviour in two wild sympatric generalists, the Northern raccoon (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), using a pull-string task with strings and wires attached to vertical cups containing high-value food. Although both species are broadly classified as generalists, raccoons show relatively greater habitat and dietary flexibility than opossums. Because they live sympatrically, it offers a unique opportunity to test - at the same time and locations - whether these finer-scale niche differences are reflective of differences in their bold and innovative behaviour. We predicted that raccoons would display bolder behaviour (in terms of touching our novel task) and more innovative behaviour (in terms of solving it). We found that both species were equally likely to acknowledge and touch the task, but raccoons were more likely to display innovation to access the food. Raccoons propensity for using innovation to solve novel foraging challenges may contribute to their greater ecological flexibility compared to opossums. More broadly, our findings may help explain differences in how each species adapts to environmental changes. HighlightsO_LIBold and innovative behaviour may help some species adapt to environmental changes C_LIO_LIWe administered a novel pull-string task to wild raccoons and opossums C_LIO_LIRaccoons displayed more innovative, not bolder, behaviour than opossums C_LIO_LIBoth species are generalists, but raccoons are more flexible than opossums C_LIO_LIDifferences in innovation may shape their finer-scale niche differences C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗

Animal psychology research changes public attitudes, but not tolerance, towards a wild carnivore beyond non-psychological information

Studies on wild animal psychology are growing in popularity due to the important role they play in understanding how wildlife is responding to human-driven environmental changes. However, communicating psychological information to the general public could undermine specific conservation objectives by encouraging greater persecution of a species (e.g., "bold" predators). Through a national-level survey (n = 1,364 participants), we tested whether communicating information about the boldness and problem-solving abilities of a wild carnivore, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), influences peoples tolerance of them. Half of participants were given information on fox psychology (either a video or a press release about fox boldness and problem-solving), the other half were given content related to animal ecology (either a video or a press release about fox habitat use). Afterwards, all participants completed the same 24-item questionnaire evaluating their tolerance of foxes. Although the participants given information about fox psychology were more likely to report a perceived attitude change due to the content they were given, their attitudes relating to fox tolerance remained unaffected regardless of content or format. We encourage further research to understand how communicating different types of information might influence, either positively or negatively, peoples tolerance of a species as more studies on wild animal psychology are published, and the publics awareness of how animal psychology relates to human-wildlife interactions becomes more widespread. HighlightsO_LIStudies on wild animal psychology are growing in popularity C_LIO_LIThe impact of animal psychology research on public attitudes is unclear C_LIO_LIWe tested if fox psychology research influences public tolerance C_LIO_LIPeople given fox psychology information reported greater attitude change C_LIO_LIThis perceived change did not impact peoples overall tolerance of foxes C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗