bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Adamo, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Adamo, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PSMtags improve peptide sequencing and throughput in sensitive proteomics

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics enables comprehensive characterization of protein abundance, function, and interactions. Label-free approaches are simple to implement but challenging to scale to thousands of samples per day. Multiplexed techniques, such as plexDIA, can address these limitations but remain restricted by the lack of mass tags optimized for data-independent acquisition (DIA) workflows. Here, we present a systematic approach screening a library of 576 compounds that identifies several small molecules that, when conjugated to peptides, improve their detection and sequence identification by mass spectrometry. The lead molecule, PSMtag, substantially increases the detection of fragment b-ions, which increases the confidence of sequence identification and enhances de novo sequencing. PSMtags allow 9-plexDIA, using only stable isotopes of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen. As a result, it allows simultaneously increasing proteome coverage and sample throughput for plexDIA workflows without compromising quantitative accuracy. We demonstrate 240 samples-per-day with 9-plexDIA, while acquiring 28,359 protein data points in the same time label-free methods acquire 4,340. Our approach constitutes an expandable framework for designing mass tags to overcome existing limitations in multiplexed proteomics and provides plexDIA reagents capable of analyzing over 1,000 samples per day when using 10 minute runs. By facilitating higher throughput and improved identification, this innovation holds significant potential for accelerating proteomic studies across diverse biological and clinical applications.

bioengineering↗

Drivers of species knowledge across the Tree of Life

Knowledge of biodiversity is unevenly distributed across the Tree of Life. In the long run, such disparity in awareness unbalances our understanding of life on Earth, influencing policy decisions and the allocation of research and conservation funding. We investigated how humans accumulate knowledge of biodiversity by searching for consistent relationships between scientific (number of publications) and societal (number of views in Wikipedia) interest, and species-level morphological, ecological and socio-cultural factors. Across a random selection of 3,019 species spanning 29 Phyla/Divisions, we show that socio-cultural factors are the most important correlates of scientific and societal interest in biodiversity, including the fact that a species is useful or harmful to humans, has a common name and is listed in the IUCN Red List. Furthermore, large-bodied, broadly distributed and taxonomically unique species receive more scientific and societal attention, whereas colorfulness and phylogenetic proximity to humans correlates exclusively with societal attention. These results highlight a favoritism towards limited branches of the Tree of Life, and that scientific and societal priorities in biodiversity research broadly align. This suggests that we may be missing out on key species in our research and conservation agenda simply because they are not on our cultural radar.

ecology↗