bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Abrignani, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Abrignani, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Maturation signatures of conventional dendritic cells in COVID-19 reflect direct viral sensing

Growing evidence suggests that conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) undergo aberrant maturation in COVID-19 and this negatively affects T cell activation. The presence of functional effector T cells in mild patients and dysfunctional T cells in severely ill patients suggests that adequate T cell responses are needed to limit disease severity. Therefore, understanding how cDCs cope with SARS-CoV-2 infections can help elucidate the mechanism of generation of protective immune responses. Here, we report that cDC2 subtypes exhibit similar infection-induced gene signatures with the up-regulation of interferon-stimulated genes and IL-6 signaling pathways. The main difference observed between DC2s and DC3s is the up-regulation of anti-apoptotic genes in DC3s, which explains their accumulation during infection. Furthermore, comparing cDCs between severe and mild patients, we find in the former a profound down-regulation of genes encoding molecules involved in antigen presentation, such as major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) molecules, {beta}2 microglobulin, TAP and costimulatory proteins, while an opposite trend is observed for proinflammatory molecules, such as complement and coagulation factors. Therefore, as the severity of the disease increases, cDC2s enhance their inflammatory properties and lose their main function, which is the antigen presentation capacity. In vitro, direct exposure of cDC2s to the virus recapitulates the type of activation observed in vivo. Our findings provide evidence that SARS-CoV-2 can interact directly with cDC2s and, by inducing the down-regulation of crucial molecules required for T cell activation, implements an efficient immune escape mechanism that correlates with disease severity.

immunology

The Endless Frontier? The Recent Upsurge of R&D Productivity in Pharmaceuticals

Analyses of pharmaceutical pipelines of drug development in the 1990-2010 documented progressively increasing attrition rates and duration of clinical trials, leading to a diffuse perception of a \"productivity crisis\". We produced a new set of analyses for the last decade, using an extensive data of more than 45,000 projects between 1990 and 2017, and report a recent upsurge of R&D productivity within the industry. First, we investigated how R&D projects are allocated across therapeutic areas and found a polarization towards high-risk/high-reward indications, with a strong focus on oncology. Importantly, attrition rates have been decreasing at all clinical stages in recent years. In parallel, we observed an increase of early failures in preclinical research, and a significant reduction of time required to identify projects to be discontinued. Notably, more recent projects are increasingly based on novel mechanisms of action and target indications with small patient populations. Finally, by analyses of the relative contribution of different institutional types and development companies, we show that the observed increased performance in clinical trials is mostly due to the contribution of biotech-nological companies, while pharmaceutical companies have significantly improved their performances in identifying false positives in preclinical research.

pharmacology and toxicology