bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Abley, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Abley, K..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Regulatory architecture tunes gene expression noise in the plant heat shock response

Cells within the same tissue can respond differently to the same stress, yet how gene regulatory networks generate and control this variability remains unclear. Here, we show that cell-to-cell variation in the Arabidopsis heat shock response is coordinated across the heat shock regulon and that the distribution of responses is tuned by the underlying regulatory network. Imaging of an HSP70 promoter reporter revealed basal activity in a subset of root cells and heterogeneous induction after heat shock, with some cells remaining near pre-stress expression levels. Dual reporters showed strong coordination between independently integrated HSP70 reporter loci, consistent with substantial shared upstream regulatory variation. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing confirmed heterogeneous but coordinated activation of heat shock genes across root cell types. Stronger heat shock states at both ambient and heat stress temperatures were associated with a recurrent thermoprotective programme across root cell populations, whereas weak responders after heat shock were associated with distinct cell-type specific transcriptional programmes, including defence- and jasmonate-associated states in some root cell types. Stochastic modelling suggested that HSFA2-dependent amplification could broaden the distribution of HSP70 expression across cells. Consistent with this prediction, experiments showed that loss of HSFA2 reduced HSP70 induction and lowered cell-to-cell variability after controlling for differences in mean expression. Together, these results show that the plant heat shock network controls both the magnitude and distribution of stress-responsive gene expression across cells.

plant biology↗

A BRC1-modulated switch in auxin transport accounts for the competition between Arabidopsis axillary buds

As part of their modular development, plants continuously adapt their shoot branching architecture according to environmental conditions. This occurs by regulating the activity of axillary buds established in each leaf axil. Whether a bud grows into a shoot depends partly on the presence of other active shoots, which can inhibit bud activation. This systemic coordination is proposed to be mediated by the transport network of the plant hormone auxin, with buds competing to establish sustained transport of auxin, termed canalised auxin transport, into the main stem. A second hormone, strigolactone, tunes this competition by influencing the removal of the PIN1 auxin export protein from the plasma membrane, and hence the dynamics of canalisation. Strigolactone also regulates the expression of another key regulatory hub, the bud-expressed transcription factor BRANCHED1 (BRC1). The interplay between auxin transport and BRC1 in regulating bud activity is poorly understood. Here, we investigate this interplay in the context of competition between buds, using Arabidopsis explants with two axillary buds as a minimal system. Using experimental data, we develop a mathematical model of bud-bud competition in which BRC1 influences the establishment of canalised auxin transport by regulating the basal rate of auxin efflux in buds. We identify single model parameters that plausibly correspond to the dual impact of strigolactone on BRC1 expression and PIN1. We show that modulating these two parameters reproduces the dynamics of bud growth and bud-bud competition observed in relevant mutants and treatments. Our model produces testable hypotheses, which we validate by generating a chimeric PIN1 auxin transporter with impaired strigolactone sensitivity, helping us uncouple the effects of strigolactone on PIN1 and BRC1. These results support the hypothesis that BRC1 influences local bud competitiveness by tuning the basal rate of auxin efflux in buds. Together with the systemic feedbacks in the auxin transport network, this enables plants to adjust dynamically the number and location of growing branches.

plant biology↗

Plasticity and invariance of Arabidopsis inflorescence and floral shoot apical meristems in response to mineral nutrients

In many species, floral organ production is invariant while flower production rate can be plastic. This allows plants to adapt flower number to their environment whilst maintaining a constant flower structure. The CLAVATA/WUSCHEL feedback loop underpins both inflorescence (IM) and floral meristem (FM) activity, respectively responsible for flower and floral organ production. We explore how plasticity and invariance can differ between IM and FM in response to nutrient availability. FM size is less sensitive to changes in nutrients than IM size, and floral organ production is insensitive to these small size changes. However, clavata3 mutants display larger changes in FM size, approaching those observed in WT IM under nutrient change, with increased floral organ number. This suggests that invariant floral organ production requires that FM size undergoes limited changes in response to nutrients. Compared to the IM, in the FM, levels of cytokinin (CK) signaling are lower and CK signaling and WUSCHEL expression are less impacted by nutrient level. Through genetic perturbations, we show a reduced response of FMs to varying cytokinin levels. Our work shows one way that the balance between plasticity and invariance can be set differently in different contexts.

plant biology↗

An ABA-GA bistable switch can account for natural variation in the variability of Arabidopsis seed germination time

Genetically identical plants growing in the same conditions can display heterogeneous phenotypes. Whether this phenotypic variability is functional and the mechanisms behind it are unclear. Here we use Arabidopsis seed germination time as a model system to examine phenotypic variability. We show extensive variation in seed germination time variability between Arabidopsis accessions, and use a multi-parent recombinant inbred population to identify two loci involved in this trait. Both loci include genes implicated in ABA signalling that could contribute to seed germination variability. Modelling reveals that the GA/ABA bistable switch underlying germination can amplify variability and account for the effects of these two loci on germination distributions. The model predicts the effects of modulating ABA and GA levels, which we validate genetically and by exogenous addition of hormones. We confirm that germination variability could act as a bet hedging strategy, by allowing a fraction of seeds to survive lethal stress.

plant biology↗